Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
BROADBAND, PHONE AND TV provider UPC has said it now has over one million subscribers in Ireland as it posted strong growth in 2012.
The company said it had a total of 988,700 subscriptions by the end of last year, representing 11 per cent year-on-year growth, and this week it reached over one million subscribers.
UPC employs 800 people in Ireland and has 700 contractors.
Broken down there was an 18 per cent increase in broadband subscriptions in the year to 31 December with UPC now having 304,300 broadband subscriptions.
Advertisement
Phone subscriptions were up 46 per cent year-on-year with 238,000 phone customers while digital television subscriptions accounted for 383,200 customers.
UPC said it had contributed over €500 million in investment as part of the roll-out of its new fibre powered network across Ireland and claims it now offers 150 Mbps broadband speeds to 40 per cent of all Irish homes.
2012 was also the year that its on-demand service was introduced with over 85 per cent of customers to whom this is available availing of the service which offers free and paid-for television series and films.
“We are also making strong progress in the business community,” chief executive of UPC, Dana Strong, said. “UPC Business ended the year as an increasingly important and growing contributor to the company.
“If you consider that over 90 per cent of all businesses in Ireland are SMEs, we believe we have a real opportunity to help these businesses underpin their growth with reliable and affordable superfast digital services.”
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
No, I’d fail to recollect the incident at first but once I’d realised I was caught out I would then remember although I would make out it was no big deal.
That said, shatter is a disgrace and must go surely.
Damocles, he wasnt stopped by the Gardai according to the article. They gestured to him, not to use the phone while driving. I would probably have a hard time recollecting that, given that it happened so long ago. No paper work, not even pulled over.
This really stinks to high heavens. Shatter is having all the TDs followed in my opinion. This is not democracy, its becoming a facist police state, where the Gestapo are watching every move anyone makes.
I’d say Wallace used the ‘i don’t remember’ excuse to see the publics reaction. Shatter looks worse breaking data protection laws than just making stuff up.
you’re spot on. people can say what they like about wallace but he is clever and most certainly shrewd. He knew immediately the significance of what shatter said on slimetime.
Are we sure any data protection laws have been broken? Everyone saying he breached data protection but its beginning to look like he didn’t. Maybe someone knows what section of the act was breached.
Unless you get stopped by the Gardai all the time and then specific incidents become hard to remember but i don’t think that’s the case here. He’s just a bit of a cowboy and it amazes me he’s still allowed to serve in The Dail after everything that’s gone on. Actually, as i wrote that, i realise it’s probably the perfect place for him along with the rest of them.
Excellent point Brian Daly, Pat Kenny teed it up nicely for him but he wasn’t sharp enough even then to realise he had something to argue about. Also he hasn’t much of a poker face- it was clear as day as soon as the allegation was put to him by Shatter that it was true, despite him uneasily muttering “I don’t remember”. Obviously after the show a few sympathisers pointed out that he had an issue here he could push and they advised him how to play it. He’s not that smart our Mick.
On this matter Wallace can not be accused of breaking any law.
The Minister and the Guards responsible for providing him with the file have to show that they did not.
Outside of Italy I cannot see any other European democracy where Shatter would not have been forced to resign by his own side and where several Guards would not be suspended under investigation.
Wallace was driving his car, he could have been prosecuted! And are you referring to Gardai, with regards quashing penalty points, or the two Guards who spoke with Wallace that day that should be suspended!??
You can only use your mobile when you’re driving if you are phoning 999 or 112, or it is another type of emergency. It is an offence to hold a mobile phone in your hand or support it with another part of your body, for example between your head and shoulder, when you are driving.
If the Gardaí charge you for this offence you will get a fixed charge notice of €60. If you pay the fixed charge you will get two penalty points. If you choose not to pay the fixed charge and are then convicted in court you will get four penalty points and a fine of up to €2,000.
Using a hands-free kit with your phone is not illegal, but it will stop you concentrating for a short time when you use your mobile phone and this puts other people using the road at risk. You could be prosecuted for dangerous driving, careless driving or driving without due care and attention because of this. And you could also have your licence endorsed or even lose your licence.
So remember, the safe control of your car, van or bus is your responsibility.
Wallace admitted to driving and using mobile at same time so he did break a law. The Gardaí decided not to do anything about it BUT HE DID BREAK THE LAW.
Yes, definitely. Another thing I find odd is that Wallace is now claiming he remembered the incident “following some more thought and a prompt from a journalist”. If a journalist knew about it, surely there was more to the story than Wallace is acknowledging?
As described by Wallace, it could hardly have been taken to be a formal interaction. The Minister for Justice does not have the right to use confidential briefings by An Garda Siochána for party political purposes. To do so undermines our justice system and is indefensible. For the Labour Party to remain silent on this very serious incident beggars belief…. yet again!
It is not that he was stopped, he wasn’t. A guard waved at him when he saw him on the phone.
Which makes what the force and Shatter did even more sinister.
It was deemed worthy of passing all the way up the chain to the Minister.
If that does not smack of intelligence gathering on political opponents then what does.
Are Guards following and targeting certain individuals so as to garner information to discredit them.
Father Ted: Ah, Sister Assumpta.
Sister Assumpta: Hello Father.
Father Ted: Dougal, Dougal, do you remember Sister Assumpta?
Father Dougal: Er, no.
Father Ted: She was here last year. And then we stayed with her in the convent, back in Kildare. Do you remember it? Ah, you do. And then you were hit by the car when you went down to the shops for the paper. You must remember all that? And then you won a hundred pounds with your lottery card? Ah, you must remember it, Dougal.
[Dougal shakes his head.]
Sister Assumpta: And weren’t you accidentally arrested for shoplifting? I remember we had to go down to the police station to get you. And the police station went on fire? And you had to be rescued by helicopter?
Father Ted: Do you remember? You can’t remember any of that? The helicopter. When you fell out of the helicopter. Over the zoo. Do you remember the tigers?
[Dougal shakes his head some more.]
Father Ted: You don’t remember? You were wearing your blue jumper.
Father Dougal: Ah, Sister Assumpta.
Claire Daly!? By that do you mean the TD Claire Daly who had been drinking Whiskey before setting off in her car, took an illegal right turn, was stopped by Gardai accordingly, tested positive for alcohol in a road-side breath test and later at a Police station once tested was clarified as having alcohol in her system but still under the limit!?! That Claire Daly!?!?
- Yeah, the sinister elements of the State really had to swing into action there to discredit the dope didn’t they! She, like Wallace & Ming, doesn’t need targeting to discredit her, they all do a great job of it all by themselves!!
an illegal turn that’s taken by lots of people. I’ve seen taxis and guards take that turn. Claire daly was followed by the guards, harrassed, handcuffed and arrested.
Yes, the Clare Daly who was so threatening that she had to be handcuffed .
Funny how Detective Kevin Keys was not treated like that. Allowed to roam the countryside until it was too late to breathalyse him. Meanwhile the innocent party he rammed was tested.
An illegal turn is just that no matter who or how many take it! And what’s your point regarding her being handcuffed!?! She was arrested…handcuffs generally follow!!
handcuffs do not “generally follow” for a drink driving arrest. It’s one thing if the stasi were dealing with an aggressive muscular drunk, another when they’re dealing with asober, timid woman.
They both should resign no pension from the current job there in , time we started makjng examples of people who think they can do as they please in this country
Garda have discretion and always will unless they have gps trackers on their caps, which we cant afford. Its field work they do and thats the reality of it. Wallace, like the majority of the independents who spout sh1t every chance they get, got caught out!
One lefty chancer with a righty snob arguing over a bit of in talking whilst we cannot afford to complete a children’s hospital, have massive emigration etc. etc…… point is, clearly their attentions should be on much more pressing matters where some strong governance is needed.
Barry, Firstly, Shatter is Minister for Justice, not Minister for Health.
In that role, Shatter is supposed to uphold the law, not use the office to have TDs spied upon for his and FG’s political ends..
All the problems that you list in that post are by-products of the culture of contempt for law, the refusal to accept responsibility, power is to be abused.
Wallace is a muppet. He now remembers. This guy could not tell the truth to save his life.
Shatter needs to keep his mouth shut too, The worst minister ever.
Wallace has always had a short memory when it come to going outside the law. He come across as a complete chancer.
No doubt he’ll look for compensation for having his character damaged.
Shatter is a bigger idiot. i don’t know what he was thinking. He deserves all the flak he is bringing on himself.
Shatter must resign for the sake of Justice in Ireland. If the Justice Minister breaks the law, he must go…. No excuses, no slap on the wrists. Over 200 people were sent to prison last year for not paying their TV license. Shatter broke a much more serious law.
Also Cathal – what law has he broken? If there it was a warning, then there is no record and no data. So nobody can have searched through the system to get this info on that basis – so no Data Protection breach. If there is no record then it’s not unreasonable to assume that somebody who was there at the time is the source which could be a lot of people.
So the question is who supplied the information or was it sought out? Did the minister knock on doors and say, give me some dirt on Wallace or did somebody volunteer the information?
Brian, ratther has said he got the information @ a garda breifing in a file which was handed to him. Why if it’s a none incident is it in a garda file?
Why are we even having this debate? Mick Wallace = self confessed thief.
Alan Shatter= man of no morals, prepared to abuse his position of power to destroy his political opponents. Anywhere else and they’d be sharing a prison cell. What’s so different in Ireland?
If it is as simple as over hearing a conservation of a man off the street mentioning it to Shatter then he is some fool to let his name become associated with this and still not have put out a statement to clarify the root of it.
For many people, myself included their will be a shadow over him after this.
If there was no paper trail how does Shatter know? That needs investigation are some boys in blue telling the minister or was the minister asking for some “dirt” on Wallace.
Yeah, I’m not a Wallace fan in any way but Shatter has really crossed the line. He’s an elected td, not a dictator and I think he should resign. Really poor judgement shown.
Shatters abuse of power becomes more interesting by the minute… Is he having TDs followed and having reports sent to him about their actions outside the Dail? Is Kenny in cahoots with him?
Are Labour really going to sit there and support a Government that is acting in this manner?
What are you on about?? Followed… ??
So labout pull out and we have an election… what then?? Do you think they will be some great change in the way a new Goverment will have to go about its business.. Truth is that FG will still most likely be the strongest party in the country followed by FF who will have exactly the same strategy only will be less capable of delivering it..
Laughable cotter. The general election will be worse possible thing to happen to fine gael. It will be another 16+ years before they see ‘power’ again. Bring it. Revoking my vote as I wasted it on a corrupt, lying, arrogant party (and I’m not talking FF here)
I’ve said this before – it pains me to make this comparison but if this was the UK, Shatter would have been asked to resign by now. Leaving the clown Wallace aside, what Shatter has done is an abuse of power and he has brought his office into disrepute.
We have no culture of resignation here. Ironically, the best thing that Wallace could have done when his tax affairs were under scrutiny, was resign. He might have set a standard doing that!
Mick you are a pathetic excuse for a politician, change you’re so called dress style and people might take you seriously. We can work on the hair later !!!
Yes wear a suit and people will believe you’re an honest person. Carry a briefcase and people will understand that you would never rob them. Wear a tie and people will recognise that you are an upstanding citizen who would never ruin the country through corruption and lies.
It explains how Clare Daly was treated by the Gardai following her. It really stinks to high heavens. She was handcuffed and put in a patrol car. Her arrest was made public within only 4 hours. All the media had it. Even though she was below the legal limit (and lets face it, 1 drink puts you over the limit), how did the Gardai know she had taken a sip of a hot whiskey. A full hot whiskey would put you over the limit and Clare Daly was found to be below that limit.
Shatter must be having all opposition TDs followed and spied on all the time. How else could he have known about Clare Daly taking the sip of the hot whiskey and how else would he have known about the Wallace incident, when Wallace was never served with any papers.
Labour, you better get your act together and walk away from the ticking time-bomb that is FG.
Cathal what planet are you? Clare daly took an illegal turn hence she was pulled over. Do you often suffer from paranoia episodes? You should get that treated.
Unmanned surveillance drones coning this way next month. I still can’t understand why they will be allowed to survey a civilian population in the republic.
@ Cathal you have no idea what tolerance Clare Daly has with regards alcohol intake so she could have had a sip or maybe 3 drinks, we don’t know. And this article isn’t about Clare Daly it’s about that lying excuse for a politician Mick Wallace
The Gardai would not have known that Clare Daly was above or below the limit until a formal test was undertaken – same with any other citizen. If you fail or can’t provide a roadside test, arrest is automatic. Handcuffs is unusual but not unlawful. If a TD is arrested for any reason, I would expect that the Minister would be informed as he should be.
A full hot whiskey after a meal would not put most drivers over the limit. Also you have factors including amount of time since drink was had. Stop rabbiting on unless you know what your talking about
Wrong again Cathal there is no set amount to put you over the limit There are too many factors involved so get over it. Sex, body weight, food consumption to name but a few
@ Cathal do you not understand alcohol tolerance at all?? Some people can be more tolerant than others that’s why we have a limit and not just 3 pints and your over attitude
Curious,, it dosn’t bloody matter what her tolerance was,, she passed the test and therefore broke no law,, she was arrested on suspected drink driving,,, and pased,,, end of story,, get over it and stop trolling like a lot of others here
Willie o’Dea was forced to resign by the Greens, especially Dan boyle.
Men like Dermot Ahern and the late Brian Lenihan laughed at the idea of a Minister having to respect the Courts, or not defame people. The jeered like thugs, even though both were Ministers for Justice themselves at a time. Which indicates the depth of the problem we have.
If it was down to FG and FF he would still be a prominent party member, oh wait, he is. Sure twas only a bit of a false statement to the court, a bit of slander.
Shatter needs to be forced to resign, the only thing that will make FG or FF’ers respect the law.
We all know bout Wallace but shatter broke ethics, basically he is a criminal for obtaining information by abuse if power if we wanted to access information on any citizen of this country we would be denied but because he is a minister he has access to all information regardless of his position he should have to go through same protocol as every other citizen Ireland is turning into a dictatorship
Fg masters of spin, big difference between a Garda judging that a caution will do and getting one overturned after the fact.
The first instance is judging the situation, the second is judged by the status of the individual. Ie wrong.
The Garda commissioners excuse for speeding is laughable.
If you are stopped for speeding take it on the chin because unless you can give an excuse that is more important than taking someone’s life you have none.
Shatter & Wallace, pot calling the kettle black & not for the first time. The two lads in the car went back to the station and said ” guess who we caught on a phone in his car this morning” and it went from there up the Garda ladder & some Chief Super thought that he would lighten the atmosphere when Shatter was on one of his rants to Garda management & told the story. Shatter thought ” I will store that information in my head for another day. The public service could not organise a conspiracy to save their life, it was just gossip.
The fact is Shatter proved Wallace was was lying,pleading ignorance is no defence and not reconised in a court of law,he was caught on a mobile while driving and it was quashed,why.
Sorry me justice cathal, where are you getting your information from. You seem damn certain that shatter broke the law, how do you know this? Are you a player in this conspiracy?
Do you possess hard evidence to back up your claim? Are you qualified to convict a man based on the small amount of circumstantial evidence available?
If I were a Garda ( and I am not ) I would be fairly peed off when Mick accused the force of being essentially corrupt in the use their discretion regarding driving offences and being aware of the incident that he has now recalled I think I would be inclined to let that knowledge out amongst the force. That a story like that should work its way to the top in present circumstances is hardly surprising. That Shatter should say it in public is.
That said I suspect that Shatter is himself more than a little irritated by MIck Wallace and his chums griping about the morals of taxation, abuse of power etc. when clearly they are more than prepared use the same lack of morals and abuse of the system when it benefits themselves. The holier than thou attitude of these newly arrived politicos clearly irritates those who have been part of the political system for a lifetime and they are determined to show them up as being no better than anyone else.
Before his election to the Dail I had huge admiration for Mick Wallace and what he had achieved from a ordinary background. Events subsequent to his election has shown me that he was just like any other developer/ businessman, willing bend whatever rule was required to realise his goal. The apparent honesty, belief in equality and business ethics that he spoke of were clearly only for public consumption. There are many commentators here intent on seeing Shatter resign over this affair but on balance I have to say that despite his many faults I would rather have him represent me than Mick Wallace
If this is the incident in question. Would it have been recorded by the Gardai and entered into PULSE and therefore available if a Minister says go and find me some sh*t on Wallace? If it took place in a public place – it’s quite possible that somebody else with more than a passing interest may have noted it and passed it on. Whether Shatter asked for it or the info was dropped on his desk (and a few journalists as well) then the source of this info does need to be identified.
To a lot of you Mick Wallace might not be flavour of the month etc etc. He is clearly not suitable for public office. He has serious questions to answer regarding his personal affairs. But he is not the one in this instance who did wrong. Mr. Shatter says he got the info on Mr. Wallace from the Gardai. Those of you saying the minister should not resign are treading on dangerous territory. He is the minister for Justice, he has access to sensitive information which if my understanding is correct means info relevant to national security. How, by any stretch of imagination does Mick Wallace using a phone while stopped at a traffic light threaten national security?
No, Mr. Shatter abused his position as Justice minister and he has to go.
Some member/members of the Gardai should be considering their position also.
Of course Mick Wallace did wrong in this instance – he now admits to using a mobile phone while driving which is a SERIOUS offence. and he only admitted to it when he absolutely had to – the crooked twister. He should never be in politics in the first place – he is an outright disgrace to his country and the rest of the politicians in Dail Eireann are a disgrace for allowing it continue.
In what world is using your phone while driving a serious offence?? Murder, Rape, Robbery, Burglary etc are serious offences, not minor traffic offences!
As much as i don’t like the ultimate sheep head Wallace he is right. What gives this little creep shatter the right to find out about such a small thing.
Is this why the Garda commissioner is always with shatter as of late? Two of these creeps should resign, and Wallace should also.
I’m going to break into wallaces house at night in a batman suit and brush his hair and iron his shirts. Then I’ll jump through a window and run off into the darkness
@VD- just like your amnesia is getting worse along with all of fine geal and their election promises? Which opening ceremony is enda going to be at this week?
In proper democracies Alan Shatter would have been forced to resign his position and possibly face prosecution. In Ireland he receives full support from his boss. That therefore makes Kenny every bit as culpable as Shatter.It seems we are governed by common criminals.
Johnny- I’m patently out of my depth crossing swords with you. Your rapier-like wit, well it’s just something with which I can’t compete. Truly. It is something to behold. I mean, the speed with which you extrapolated VD. Awesome. Surely you should be on a stage, somewhere? A book deal can’t be too far away. I tip my hat to you, Sir. When your path crosses a satirist of your stature, what else can one do?
So would Wallace for tax evasion. Correct me if I’m wrong but Al Capone was sent to prison for the same crime, Wallace gets a gentle slap on the wrist.
To be honest neither person comes out of this incident with any glory and both are in the wrong.
Shatter has shown extremely poor judgement to reveal this information on a national television programme. He has completely undermined his argument because of his arrogance. Wallace once more proves that his memory is selective until he’s caught out and he’s a hypocrite to boot, giving out about this when he has benefited from it and probably well knew it.
A plague on both their houses. Perhaps if both of them resigned, Shatter as a minister and Wallace as a TD it would be worth it. I suspect neither will happen.
Just out of curiosity, would a minster for justice not have access to records like this. I am well aware certain civil servants can access this information. Very certain if it was Wallace he’d do worse. . Wallace is a tax evading sham who will happily knowing his position happily take the Gardas “better judgement and discretion” , He could of took the fine as a matter of principle. He did something wrong, he should be punished. Yes it might of been a small thing on the journal about it, but I’m sure he could’ve found some positives in with being honest.
If I worked in a call centre and used information on someone for my own benefit then I would be imprisoned. Shatter is a disgrace and is eroding justice.
I understand data protection very well thank you, But do you know what Alans powers are? What he has access too? How do you know he’s not allowed to have access to these files? Maybe he shouldn’t of brought it up on Prime time, but still brought up none the less. Wallace a public elected figure, lied. He challenged shatter and lost as he was caught committing a criminal offence If Wallace came across a such a incident but was in Alan’s shoes, would he do the same? I think very much so. Ever greedy , always looking to make their competition to look bad.
Jackets – Clare Daly was arrested by the roadside in public. Being seen by somebody else was unavoidable – a photo of her being arrested could have been published online before she even got to the station. That’s the reality – it’s not that outlandish. Plus I don’t think any Gardai would have an elected TD sitting in the cells without telling their superiors. That could be a real hot potato. Also, it’s only right that the minister responsible should also know – it’s not an ordinary arrest. Unfortunately, the more people who know the more likely it is to leak. The flip side we don’t want TDs being arrested in secret either.
The minions in authority in AGS are mugs running to shatter with this information. Probably delighted with themselves appeasing the minister with a bit of ‘info’ on Wallace. Pathetic. Keep out of politics An Garda Siochana, it is not your place.
Shatter & co continue to abuse their power on such topics. Why don’t the abuse their power and jail the bankers, developers and politicians who robbed this country and its people?! Its slowly turning into a dictatorship. This country will change only when idiots stop electing failed teachers, publicans and farmers who are clearly out of their depth and only in it so they and their familys can be set up for life at our expence.
A lot of people seem to think it was a “witness”, who informed Shatter about the incident. If this is correct, it would be classed as hear-say. Is this what our Justice minister is reduced to ? Acting on hear-say, and gossip !
Or it could be a case of whistleblowing if you wanted to look at it in another light. A garda who was in position of the fact that Mick Wallace was being openly critical of a policy that he had benefited from and had kept secret.
You can spin it any way you want really depending on which side of the argument you are on. Personally I’m on neither side. They’re both in the wrong.
I don’t think the point is that Shatter disclosed information on Mick Wallace.i think the point is that Minister of Justice publicly aired information about a citizen to discredit him with no regard to that Citizens right to privacy. It is still unknown why Shatter had this specific information. Can he remember the names of everyone that received a warning off the top of his head or is he using his position to gather dirt on his political opponents?
It’s very disturbing when the Minister of Justice has no actual regard for Justice or the rights of the Citizens he is supposed to protect. I don’t see Shatter being so transparent about the letter used to threaten the Irish Govt into taking the Bailout or protecting the Bondholders.
You have to wonder why this story is making more headlines then how the gardai investigated themselves and found themselves a “great bunch of lads”. Instead shatter does a move that even a second rate politician knows “create a bigger story”. Go to the courts Mick don’t waste your time explaining your case allowing yourself to be judged by a media court. Shatter has used you on national television to divert attention away from gardai corruption and misuse of data stored on the gardai computer system. Questions also have to be also asked of RTE about how these two people were invited onto the programme did shatter advisers set this whole thing up. If labour can do it for the presidential election.
Garda no.1–”Who’s yer man beside us on his phone”? Garda no.2– “Jaysus, it looks like yer man Wallace”. Garda no.1- “Are ye sure”? Garda no.2– “Well,that’s what it says on the side of his vehicle”. Both gardai together– “Howya Mr.Wallace, how’s she cuttin”??
What I can’t understand is how a journalist was able to prompt Mick Wallace’s memory. Had he already told others about the incident and then forgotten it? Or had the journalist been briefed by the same source who briefed the Minister? When a politician is making capital from throwing accusations about others they need to be above reproach themselves. If not, it is in the public interest to reveal information that shows them
To have double standards. As usual, the chattering class are trying to turn this into another outrage. They should devote their energy to something important.
You can just imagine the two Gardai pulling up to the lights. Nice blond there says one to the other. Edge up a little closer so I can see, ‘m off this weekend ya never know. Ah no its Mick Wallace. Christ on a bike – think of something to say. Errrr were you using that phone? Sorry guard. Thats was close says they. Lads drive off – not a word to anyone now. But meanwhile back @ Gestapo head quarters – a diligent young FGer listening to one of the many the bugging devices in active service contacts the bould Alan. Let it with me says he – I will sort this out.
about as believable as the minister’s story thus far
If you saw this chapie being pulled over by the Garda and not being booked [He's not exactly invisible is he] would you be on to the Minister or the Commissioner or at least the Journal for an explanation? I bet that the Minister will have on record a call from a ‘concerned citizen’ who saw the event.
I don’t drive, but it is a very unfair situation that Gardai show ‘discretion’ when it comes to politicians for driving offences that should incur penalty points. Driving while talking on the phone is a crime, no matter who the perpetrator is.
lets bury this falsehood…Gardai exercise their discretion every day with regard to minor offences of all types. noone gets preferential treatment. its part of policing in this country.
Wallace has some neck – not only did he not pay taxes including VAT but was there something about using money that should have gone into employees pensions?. Pot Kettle and Black come to mind. I do agree that two wrongs do not make a right – they are both in the wrong and to me it just emphasises how much we, the citizens of Ireland need a total overhaul of society to include political parties, legal profession, banks and their executives.
I do not believe it is good enough to our sovreign debt situation is improving, what is the point of getting that right when the structures and the people who led us down into a financial hell are still scot free and in many cases in charge and still earning big money.
someday a journalist will write a piece on the poor state of garda transport and other essential kit as compared with police forces in Uk…someday a journalist will examine procurement policies…maybe compare staffing levels….though Im not holding my breath…much easier to make headlines out of nonsense!
China to slap extra 34% tariffs on all US imports in retaliation to Trump measures
2 hrs ago
38.5k
119
Charged
Russell Brand has been charged with rape, indecent assault, oral rape and sexual assault
23 mins ago
9.9k
Live Blog
US stocks drop sharply as EU considers response to Trump tariffs
21 hrs ago
49.4k
71
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 164 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 111 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 146 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 116 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 85 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 85 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 136 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 76 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 84 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 47 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 93 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 100 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 73 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 55 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 91 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say