Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

TripAdvisor defends reader reviews following warning by watchdog

The website has responded to criticisms about its “real travellers’” reviews section – saying that its users made “educated decision” based on reviews.

Image: Stacie Stacie Stacie via Creative Commons/Flickr

THE TRAVEL WEBSITE TripAdvisor has defended itself following the UK’s advertising standards watchdog upholding a complaint about the review section of the website.

The Advertising Standards Authority said that some of the website’s statements were misleading – such as promises to present “reviews you can trust” and “more than 50 million honest travel reviews and opinions from real travellers around the world”.

KwikChex Ltd and two hotels challenged the claims made on the website, saying that they could not be substantiated as coming from genuine travellers.

In its ruling, the ASA said that consumers would reasonably understand the claims “Reviews you can trust”, “… read reviews from real travellers”, “TripAdvisor offers trusted advice from real travellers” and “More than 50 million honest travel reviews and opinions from real travellers around the world” to mean that they could be certain that the reviews posted on the site were from genuine travellers, and accurately reflected those travellers’ experiences of the places they visited.

Noting that those posting reviews on the site were asked to agree to a declaration that their review was their genuine opinion,  that they had no personal or business affiliation with the hotel in question and had not been offered an incentive to write a review for it, the ASA nonetheless observed that reviews could be posted on the site “without any form of verification”.

The ASA it considered that the claims implied that consumers could be assured that all review content on the TripAdvisor site was genuine – when that may not be the case – and therefore concluded that the claims were “misleading” and ordered that the advert not appear again in its current form.

However, today TripAdvisor defended its claims, saying: “this ruling flies in the face of common sense and is unrealistic in its expectations from sites like ours.”

Pointing out that an independent group that provides industry expert advice to the ASA, the General Media Panel, disagreed with the ASA’s view of the claims, TripAvidor said: “Complaints were upheld on the basis that we could not provide 100 per cent certainty that every single review on the site was written by a real traveller and could be trusted. No system, verified or not, could provide this”.

It added that the site’s users approached TripAdvisor “with common sense”, and made educated decision based on the opinions they read there.

The statement also quoted a recent PhoCusWright study commissioned by TripAdvisor, which claimed that 98 per cent of respondents had found the site’s hotel reviews “to be accurate of the actual experience”.

Read next:

Comments (23 Comments)

  • This is a big issue for the hotel industry. Some hotel owners write bad reviews about other hotels. When a hotel changes hands tripadviser won’t update detail despite repeated requests.

    Reply
    • This happened with the hotel i work in. The reviews went from being crap to being good with some reviewers saying. ‘hotel under new management’. So I don’t think the fact that trip advisor won’t achknowledge new management impacts too much.

      If your hotel or restaurant is good word will spread soon enough and your reviews should Reflect this!

      Reply
  • Some reviews you must take with a pinch of salt or ignore such as the ones that say “receptionist was rude” or “breakfast was terrible”.These complaints are very selective, unique and probably one offs. I always consult TA and always review the Hotel(only hotels) and really only go on solid complaints like “dated decor”, “stag/hen party hotel” or “overpriced overnight parking” and other reasonable concerns. Secondly candid photos from people are invaluable as they give a true reflection of the place. Before TA you would visit, not enjoy it, regret it and have lost the money. It is better to be informed. As for fake reviews, whether good or bad, that is a TA problem as doesn’t affect my use of the site. Lastly, the forums are great, if you have a location specific question like “where’s the cheapest place to buy theatre tickets the day off the show?” you can only as the locals or the “local expert” and now you can ask in advance. Haters always gonna hate!

    Reply
  • You should always take all TripAdvisor reviews with a pinch of salt…That said I always found it a good resource. And I contribute regularly and honestly.
    I find it really hard to believe that hotels are losing business because of TripAdvisor. And if they are they probably deserve it. A kip is a kip no matter how hard sappy marketing copy and airbrushed photos they stick on their websites try to convince us differently.

    Reply
  • I can understand how something like Trip Advisor would scare the industry. It’s totally transparent and self regulated. I’ve found it invaluable. I take two factors into account when booking a hotel – the price and the reviews. I use Trip Advisor to get a general overview. Eg. if somewhere as 100+ reviews and the average score is high, they are not all going to be fake. Plus sometimes some negative comments can be so comical and minute.

    Reply
  • There are an equal number of genuine and fake reviews on trip advisor. The rating system is unreliable. If you go through a hotels reviews , a bad review will be followed by a load of good(fake) reviews from the hotels. You have to read between the lines but if trip advisor wants to retain any credibility it needs to deal with the issues,not deny they exist, and get more accurate and honest content that’s actually useful. As it stands it’s borderline spam and good hotels are being lost at the expense of hotels with more sophisticated marketing.

    Reply
  • And I totally agree with Mark above…the rating should be somehow weighed. I mean, if you look at the restaurant rankings in Cork, there are chippers with 3 reviews that rank higher than established five star French restaurants!

    Reply
    • Maybe only use the star rating of those who have posted five or more, say, reviews to generate the overall rating. I have found it useful, though and if one review seems very out of line, I disregard it unless person has form.

      Reply
  • B7584 04/02/12 #

    Wasnt the carlton hotel group in ireland recently caught out leaving fake reviews? It came from head office that each hotel was to have staff who were ‘designated reviewers’ that posted good reviews.
    George Hook was talking about it during the week.

    Reply
  • With the whole Internet at you fingertips, you have got to be pretty naive to rely solely on one source of information. I have planned many an adventure using Trip Advisor amongst many sources. Always had a great time.

    Reply
  • Still use the site when checking out hotel, the majority of the reviews can’t be bogus or can they, ah the power of technology………..

    Reply
  • When I hotel hunt, I open the likes of booking.com and alpharooms as well as tripadvisor. If the price is right, then I go to tripadvisor to see if it’s just a bog standard hotel or a real shithole. The best way to judge is to look at photos supplied by members, rather than the hotels. A hotel for €39 a night shouldn’t be getting 5 star reviews. Use your common sense and you’ll be grand.

    Reply
  • I generally discount the American reviews as the usually start “The bathroom was small – even by European standards” ! The last time I saw this the hotel in question was over 150 years old!

    Reply
  • Borrrrrrrrrrrrring article

    Reply
    • In fairness your always going to have one or two suspect reviews. But when a hotel has 50+ reviews you do get a fairly good indication on what the place is like

      What I don’t get is if a new hotel only gets, say 3 reviews and they are all 5* it will shoot to the top of the list where as a hotel with 100 reviews on 4.5* will be further down the list. The votes should be weighted to stop newer hotels playing the system

      Reply
    • Yea, but why would u review or stay in a place that already has bad review, even if the hotel is rebuild from the ground up. Because the web site will not acknowledge change of ownership or management.

      Reply
  • Trip advisor is aload of crap. With a bit of effort you can easily make yourself the top ranked establishment in your area. It drives me nuts how people seem to think its some sort of bible. I would go as far as saying 80 to 90 % of reviews are false.

    Reply
    • All people who give guesswork percentages to complete random stories are wrong 98% of the time

      Reply
    • I honestly don’t think that’s the case to be honest. Going through true advisor some people leave some very thorough reviews – good and bad, with management in alot of cases replying to each and every one (as is the case in our hotel). Although the system isn’t flawless I do believe is it effective

      I think it’s fairly easy to spot the fake reviews anyway!

      Reply
    • random 04/02/12 #

      The point is that TripAdvisor are now saying that it is impossible for them to verify the authenticity of their reviews (and by extension, to know what percentage of them are fake), while their advertising slogans have been claiming that their reviews are “honest” and by “real travellers”. They are only digging themselves a deeper hole in fairness. They have no standard to live up to except the one that they have claimed for themselves.

      Reply
  • In fairness

    Reply

Add New Comment