Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Not for turning: Germany says eurobonds are ‘completely inappropriate’

A spokesman for Angela Merkel has reiterated the Chancellor’s opposition to the pooling of eurozone debt, an idea gaining growing support among other eurozone nations.

Angela Merkel speaking to the media last week.
Angela Merkel speaking to the media last week.
Image: Markus Schreiber/AP/Press Association Images

GERMANY HAS REITERATED its opposition to the introduction of eurobonds with a spokesperson for the German chancellor Angela Merkel saying they could only be considered “after several years” of steps towards greater integration by eurozone members.

The comments come despite growing calls for the introduction of the pooling of eurozone debt in order to alleviate the current crisis among country’s in the single currency, calls echoed by Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti at the weekend.

“We are talking about several years and certainly not a solution that we are thinking about in the current problematic situation,” Merkel’s spokesman, Steffen Seibert, told a government news conference.

Broadly, eurobonds are a proposal that would involve countries in the eurozone pooling some of their debt which would be underwritten by all countries as opposed to each individual member as it presently stands.

This would allow for troubled nations, such as Ireland, to have cheaper borrowing costs.

Supported by France, whose newly-elected president Francois Hollande believes they are a solution to the crisis, Germany – whose borrowing costs would rise if they were introduced –  is steadfastly against them believing it would be picking up the tab for profligate nations in debt.

Seibert added that in the current climate the eurobonds idea was, in the view of the German federal government, a “completely inappropriate means to bring Europe out of the crisis.”

He added that it would take “several years” and greater political integration before it would be conceivable that eurobonds could be considered.

- with reporting from AFP

Read: ‘We have to get a deal on our bank debt’ – Tánaiste

Read: Eurobonds will come sooner or later, reckons Mario Monti

Explainer: What are Eurobonds and why do they matter?

Read next:

Comments (99 Comments)

  • And so the Germans reveal themselves…They recklessly lend to other EU states, but refuse to take a portion of the blame. I grew up being taught that we should model ourselves on the Germans. How can they explain their actions? I thought the EU was all about “one for all, all for one” ideology?

    Reply
    • “recklessly lend”! But Ireland recklessly borrowed!!

      Reply
    • Ireland has taken on the full responsibility. That’s the issue: *full* responsibility.

      As somebody else said on this forum, do you not think it’s a dangerous precedent if 100% of all bank losses are simply passed on to taxpayers?

      Reply
    • @Declan Noonan. Ireland did not “wrecklessly borrow”. Throughout the boom years Ireland consistantly returned budget surpluses and had the lowest sovereign debt of any EU state.
      This is the ‘Yes’ way to try and re-write history.
      Private capitalist banks borrowed wrecklessly. Those same private banks, assured thousands of ordinary Irish citizens, that the money they in turn were borrowing was prudent and made financial sense. It was the bankers job to bank, not the carpenter, not the builder, not the nurse, teacher or green grocer! They have their own jobs to be doing. It is the bankers job to determine whether the money you want to borrow is a financially sound decision. Many ordinary people were led to believe it was, by the banks! Some people made mistakes, but by and large it was their one and only mistake. The banks made the same mistake thousands of times over, week after week.
      Don’t try and rewrite history. This debt is not our debt.

      Reply
    • this “reckless borrowing” effort from some of you is getting to me
      I once borrowed enough money to buy a car , paid it all back,
      got a small remortgage to do some home improvments, nearly all paid back,
      worked hard and paid taxes most of my life, needed very little back from the State,

      but I’m still being punished for “reckless borrowing”

      any of you able to justify this please?.

      Reply
    • I think a personal debt of some 185bn for the 4 million people in the country would suggest some reckless borrowing. with 95 bn being mortgage debt the rest is personal loans, credit cards. I didn’t go mad either. But some sure as hell did…

      Reply
    • Declan, the German banks, or as they should be known unsecured bond holders lent to reckless Irish banks with the full knowledge that the ridiculous house of cards would collapse, and that they would be insulated from any loses. Now you and I are tasked with paying them back. Do you not feel a slight bit of anger, a no vote would have sent the correct signal that we are fed up of getting in the backside from the German jackboot. I’m tired of the nonsense about a yes vote promoting a more prosperous Ireland. It will only result in further indebtedness to German banks, further sales of national assets, Ireland will be asset stripped and sold for its constituent parts, bye bye my lovely isle.

      Reply
  • Let’s blame the Germans.in 2007 Christian Paul the German Ambassador commented on us all driving new cars when the average car age in Germany was nine years old .A junior minister was earning more than the German Chancellor and doctors and nurses were paid 40% more than in Germany and that the building bubble was not sustainable.Did we listen? No we told him to mind his own business and to go home. They did not force us to take the money the idiot developers who had the combined business brain of a gnat supported by dodgy politicians,grabbed all they could get.If you were a German worker how would you feel when you see how that money was squandered by the countries now in the program and now we have the begging bowl out again looking for more their answer must be no.Will it hurt them in the future yes as their exports fall but I guess the average Heinz is just fed with being blamed for everything .the comments re Croke Park I agree with 100% but dont hold your breath as the eunuch coalition will do anything to avoid it

    Reply
    • The Germans aren’t on the pig’s back. Real wages and social welfare have been frozen for 10 years. People are basically forced to work in low wage jobs offered to them or else they get cut off.

      They’ve raised their retirement age but they see Greeks retiring at 52….?

      If you’re on welfare in Germany, it’s harder than here.

      Reply
    • I agree Tom, a lot of Irish people spent all the cheap money borrowed from the banks like there was no tomorrow. Hopefully this is a wake up call to a lot of people who borrowed foolishly and I’m not talking about the unfortunate young people who were sold unmanageable mortgages. If nothing else our so called leaders will be held responsible for managing the economy and it’s finances. It was nothing short of insanity what went on in this country during the so called boom. A good prudent housewife would have done a better job than all the highly educated politicians, economists and advisers. Hopefully we’ll all come out the other side of this recession ok and a bit wiser.

      Reply
  • Political change will have to happen in Germany first before Europe can crawl back to growth, this woman has now shown herself to be selfishly anti E.U, she may see herself as acting in the best interest of Germany but Its only in the short term, if the E.U single currency goes belly up Germany and German people will end up suffering along with the rest of us. I’m all for fiscal responsibility but there is only so much austerity we can take.

    Reply
    • its a pretty safe bet to assume that unless there are some seismic changes in europe and germany that Frau Merkel will go the same way as Sarkozy et al come the next GE’s in germany in Oct 2013 (which in politics is still a long way off)…….

      the question is will her replacement be any better for us all ?

      Reply
  • I actually support Eurobonds despite having voted no. Eurobonds would pool the credit-rating of all member states on the bond-markets, resulting in lower interest rates. But that would mean much higher interest rates for German debt which is why they don’t want it. Which sortof underlines that the concept of European unity does not exist beyond the realm of bureaucracy and transfers of sovereignty. As I see it Germany has a moral responsibility to agree to Eurobonds because it has benefited from the single ECB interest rate while peripheral economies like Ireland, Spain, Portugal and Greece have been crushed by it in the form of property-bubbles/crashes, rampant inflation (not in our case now but during the bubble), and consequent austerity.

    Reply
  • Anybody else think she’d make a great Freddy Kreuger?

    Reply
  • Paul 04/06/12 #

    They benefit from the euro being weaker than a German currency would be, helping to keep their exports competitive. Germany is one of the major beneficiaries of the euro. They get a free lunch on it and they’re not going to give that up to start paying for it. Cheaper than a new war and more effective, they got it for a bargain and they’re not up for haggling. Our only option was sabotage and that’s gone.

    http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2012/05/18/punk-economics-lesson-4

    Reply
    • The German establishment realize this, but most of their citizens don’t get it. They think they’ve just emerged from years of austerity only to see reckless foreigners demanding that they foot the bill for years of partying.

      The biggest problem is lack of leadership from Germany, not some kind of hidden agenda.

      If they were really as strong as people think, then Merkel should have insisted that Greece either stick to what they signed up to OR leave the euro. Did you notice that they didn’t do that? They’re still funding the Greeks.

      Reply
  • Fagan's 04/06/12 #

    If Germany continues on its path then we will have a global depression, it really is that simple.

    Spain is a humongous problem. To solve it there will have to be Eurobonds, massive stimulus and debt write down. To solve the Euro zone clusterfup will require international assistance from the G20. The EU does not have the funds, is not willing to use QE to resolve it, is not willing to act as a normal currency zone in order to resolve it. I wouldn’t be surprised if part of the deal to resolve the Euro involves about 6 countries going off from the currency.

    Reply
  • No Eurobonds & No retrospective deal on Irelands bank debt! Great deal we are getting post allowing the Bundestag to write on our constitution. I would like to personally thank all the Yes men for selling our nation out! Ye truly have strengthened our hand! Well done! Ye should be very proud of the country ye have created and the legacy we are now passing down to our children!

    Reply
  • The Germans are right. Why should they pay much higher borrowing costs?

    As far as that goes, one of the rating agencies has said that if euro bonds were launched now, they’d be immediately rated as junk.

    The euro is the problem. It needs to be dismantled in an orderly fashion.

    Reply
    • accidently red thumbed you Danny, completely agree – dump the Euro, it has become a failed experiment.

      Reply
    • It’s okay, Ann. I think it’ll happen eventually but we have such indecisive leaders in Europe, they will wait until the only option is a chaotic disintegration.

      Reply
    • It looks like a euro collapse is increasingly likely.

      That said, it will be a disaster for Ireland in particular.

      Not only will our debts still be in a hard currency. Our new currency will be exposed to speculators. Judging by our recent record we haven’t a hope in hell in managing that successfully.

      It will also most likely lead to a collapse of the EU. Just look at how angry people are already.

      Reply
    • Fagan's 04/06/12 #

      The Germans want the Euro but are not willing to do what being in a currency union entails. Given that that is the case, the currency will break up.

      I think that they accept that reality and are allowing the markets and banks to decouple from the 6-7 nations that should never have been in the currency. The frightening alternative is that they are genuinely believe that what they are doing is the right course and that they are also going to use it to achieve complete union in Europe.

      This crisis is growing rapidly and is a significantly worse position than even a few years ago.

      Reply
  • Of course merkel doesn’t want eurobonds. Eurobonds would stabilise and strengthen the currency. A weak unstable euro benefits germany and allows it to exert control over the eurozone area. Germany is the only eurozone country who will meet the targets set out in the fiscal compact this year, this is not a coincidence.

    Reply
  • jrbmc 04/06/12 #

    They waited till after vote to come out with this, if they had said it last week it have been a No result

    Reply
  • Might not be the popular thing to say here, but Germany has a point. Why should high-risk nations get to borrow from the market at low-risk prices? Where would the incentive be for countries like Greece to get their affairs in order if they could simply continue to borrow unsustainably at cheap prices.

    Eurobonds could only work in a Federal European structure where members get a say in how the money which they jointly raise on the open market is spent. Given the frequently hysterical antagonism towards anything the German Govt say or do, I’m not sure many people are prepared yet for Federalism. Nevertheless it remains the only method by which Eurobonds could transpire. If you favour eurobonds; you favour federalism.

    Reply
    • Less of that sensible talk around here, Stephen.

      Reply
    • Yes Germany would be correct, if this wasn’t about the Union and not just them? Thanks for clarifying that Germany is merely thinking about itself while other partner nations are going through hell. Germany: Let’s leave people starve in Ireland, Spain, Greece and Italy. Lets leave citizens of these nations commit suicide due to debt issues caused by stagnating economies, after all if we were to lend a hand it would slightly increase our borrowing costs.

      I am pro Europe, but if that’s what this farce of a “union” has come to I want out! Even your justification of such remarks proves how delusional some people have become! My God, I’m in awe at the lack of loyalty to Ireland and her people our citizens are showing! What is wrong with this God damn nation!

      Reply
    • In short Diarmaid – me feinism.

      Reply
    • I will never again buy anything that is manufactured in Germany. Where would they be if the rest of Europe stopped buying German cars and white goods. Hit them in their own pockets and put the German workers job on the line.

      Reply
    • @Ann – you’ll be buying a lot of stuff that won’t work then….

      Reply
    • Spain is looking for, most recent estimate, €200 billion to bailout it’s banks. Plus it’s expected to put €60 odd billion into the (as yet non-existent) ESM to access bailout funds.
      Irelands exchequer borrowings have reached levels that cannot be managed or serviced by this economy.
      Yet Europes proposed solutions have gone from ineffective to, now, farcical.
      Putting the morality or injustice of the situation to one side. There is no credible solution on the table. This situation will blow up in Merkel’s face, and more importantly German taxpayers, when periphery nations begin to default on sovereign debts or their banks collapse. Whichever comes first, the other will definitely follow.

      Reply
    • Well put Stephen. Some just not prepared to accept the fact that Germany won’t countenance further support without strong fiscal rules. And we need them. Just to be clear, the treaty contents are not enshrined in our constitution as one commentator here keeps saying…

      Reply
    • Yes O’Reilly, we just had a referendum that had nothing to do with the constitution. Dream on.

      Just because the Greeks/Italians are wrong does not make Germany correct. They have to be more responsible if they want to stay in the euro. However, the German leaders are acting like a deer caught in the headlights. They know they’re exposed to a 1 trillion euro bill either way. They need to show more leadership or else the EU will be an historical footnote.

      Spain has a strong hand. It’s real politik now.

      Reply
    • O Reilly has our constitution changed because of the treaty? Careful now, cause I have proof here. I never once suggested that the whole treaty gets written into our constitution. Stop being so immature and read what I actually post! You’re just wrong, so give it up will ya please!

      Reply
    • “We don’t need a European super state, which the European Union is seeking to establish … but rather a Europe and world consisting of hundreds or even thousands of tiny Liechtensteins and Singapores.”
      Hans-Hermann Hoppe

      Reply
    • Diarmuid, in lay man’s terms, tell the people what has changed in our constitution and how it changes the constitution of Ireland. If you wouldn’t mind…

      Reply
    • No no, don’t divert the question, answer mine first please? Unless that is of course you now know you’ve been talking out your backside whilst accusing other people of doing that?

      Reply
    • @ Gagsy…not at all, I have a Candy fridge freezer and condensor dryer which I bought 18 years ago both of which are still going strong.

      Reply
    • Yes Diarmuid, in writing the clause allowing the oireachtas ratify the ESM it has changed. By 1 clause. Now, remind me again how, and I quote, those who voted yes have “enshrined a German treaty into our constitution”? You can do it in a German accent too. I don’t mind…

      Reply
    • Diarmaid, give us all a rest. If it wasn’t for dishonesty from people like you, we might have convinced people to vote no.

      Reply
    • Wow. O’Reilly admits the constitution had to be changed. The exact wording of the change is a blank cheque:

      Article 29.4:[2]

      10° The State may ratify the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union done at Brussels on the 2nd day of March 2012. No provision of this Constitution invalidates laws enacted, acts done or measures adopted by the State that are necessitated by the obligations of the State under that Treaty or prevents laws enacted, acts done or measures adopted by bodies competent under that Treaty from having the force of law in the State.

      In other words, the measures required by the treaty supercede our constitution.

      It’s there in black and white. Where is the dishonesty?

      Reply
    • Oh I am sorry Danny, didn’t realise you were the self appointed head voice of the no campaign. I’ll be sure to secure your permission before talking in future. O Reilly, you have just admitted that the treaty does make an amendement to our constitution after you accused me of being a liar not so long ago for stating the truth! Your credibility is now null and void!

      Reply
    • Economics Prof says Spain requires €500 Billion:

      “This contagion is spreading faster than we can stop now,” Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth and former Bank of England policy maker, said in a radio interview on “Bloomberg Surveillance” with Tom Keene and Ken Prewitt. “You need to do something in a week, and it would take these guys a year to work it out.”
      With markets bracing for further deterioration in Spain’s finance sector and a possible Greek departure from the 17-member euro area, Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy on June 2 added his voice to calls for a “banking union” in Europe involving a centralized system to re-capitalize lenders.
      German Chancellor Angela Merkel shut off another crisis- fighting avenue the same day as she toughened her opposition to euro-area debt sharing, saying that “under no circumstances” would she agree to euro bonds.
      Paul De Grauwe, a professor at the London School of Economics & Political Science, has proposed a blanket bond markdown across Europe. European nations lack the cooperation required to execute such a plan, Blanchflower said.

      Yields on German two-year notes fell below zero for the first time ever last week as investors fled riskier sovereign debt. Spanish bonds dropped for a fourth week, pushing the country’s 10-year yields above 6.5 percent — nearing the 7 percent threshold which triggered the three earlier bailouts.
      Spain plans to sell bonds maturing in 2014, 2016 and 2022 on June 7. The amount hasn’t yet been set. Blanchflower estimates that the nation will need to raise about 500 billion euros ($625 billion).

      Bloomberg

      Reply
    • In your face O’Reilly. Danny, get down to the back of the class. There’s no arguing with Diarmaid when he’s on a rant. ;)

      Reply
    • That and he is correct Under the Radar! ;)

      Reply
  • mel 04/06/12 #

    Merkel is taking over Europe with the banks instead of tanks, well done the YES men,this debt which isn’t ours will be around our necks for years
    The treaty will widen the gap between GDP and debt and Ireland will eventually default

    Reply
  • Dear Germany, World War, Humility, 1948 default, begging bowl of your own, union, not our debt. Regards, Ireland

    Reply
  • Good on her standing up for what is right for her country. It’s a shame we have no national pride or similar intelligence in our nation.

    She is the boss ;)

    Reply
  • It’s almost exactly as if the Germans want to run Europe like their own little Empire. What’s the word the Germans would use? Reich?

    Reply
  • Read the George Sorus article. This is a stitch up from the beginning. The architects of the Euro knew this woy happen eventually but knew that integration wasn’t possible at the outset. They knew that crises like these would force further integration and so they just had to sit back and wait. Merkel said it herself Eurobonds will only happen
    after years of further integration. Mark my words. There’s another Lisbon on the way and a fear campaign to go with it.

    Reply
  • Without Germany to underwrite them (which you cant force them to do) Eurobonds would be in the junk category prior to issue…

    Many here seem to think that Germany is just ‘saying no’ to a French/EU plan

    Reply
  • Mainly Stephen because it’s a currency union. By the way, if the Germans continue to get all huffy about us giving out about having their money shoved down our throats, with interest added for giving us the privilege of using it to mainly pay back their reckless banks, somebody might refer them to a little less sanctimony by way of the following entries in a history book “Plan, Marshall..” and ” Debt Act, London, 1954″

    We’re long overdue closing our structural deficit, but a less Puritanical piety would help. And scrapping Croke Park.

    Reply
  • Ooohhh yeeaaa, look at those come to bed eyes!

    Reply
  • If all the goods in the World were 100 apples and only 10 people lived on this Planet, these 10 people would have 3 choices:

    1) Each could share the 100 apples.

    2) Everyone could compete (or fight) for those 100 apples so that some may have more than 10 apples and some will end up with none.

    3) All people could be guaranteed to have 10 apples and those who are willing and capable to produce from that starting point could have even more (for example planting the seeds of those apples). Their work would then become a reward besides those 10 apples needed to survive

    Communism is choice number one.

    Capitalism is choice number two.

    Commutalism is choice number three.

    The difference between these 3 is that corruption could infect the first or the second choice but not the third which is born with a new “immune system”.

    Aside from corruption,

    Communism limits the human spirit and dims the ambitions which are needed for the spark of new ideas and advancement. This concept of sharing finds its main obstacle in the Ego within any Human being.

    Instead,

    Capitalism exploits those economically weak and values the human being according to wealth and private property. Based on competition and discordance this system will punctually lead to unsustainable extremes.

    If Commutalism was to rise it would be like a new race for those who want to run while for all others ……. they will still have 10 apples.

    http://www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Commutalism

    http://www.wavevolution.org

    Reply
    • Gagsy 99 05/06/12 #

      Choice 3 is also pretty much capitalism.
      What happens to the folks who do nothing and just eat their apples? When their apples are all gone they go and work for the guys with the seeds to get some more apples.
      Also works with pears by the way.

      Reply
  • It’s an economic war in Europe at the moment

    Reply
  • People we are truly in for a rough ride, I tell you mark my words we aint seen nothing yet, already they are starting on about the household tax, I hope all the smart a…. yes people eat their vote, and suffer like I have no doubt the rest of us will.

    Reply
  • Paul 04/06/12 #

    Is it too soon to say I told you so?

    Reply
  • Gagsy 99 05/06/12 #

    Surprising conclusions to be drawn from this discussion:

    A lot of people believe that Germany’s objective in Europe is hegemony by stealth.

    No voters in general hate yes voters often with a disturbingly furious passion.

    A depressingly large number of people believe that all senior government politicians are deliberately evil and treacherous.

    Depressingly few people believe the same politicians are driven by a genuine vocation to public service.

    Polarised extremism is alive and well thus making any discussion in this forum utterly futile (although perhaps entertaining). Nobody with an opinion here is ever convinced by the arguments of someone with a different opinion. Ever.

    Reply
    • It shouldn’t just be about opinions. If people voted on information rather than opinions, they would saw that at best, there was nothing in the treaty to address the current crisis.

      Reply
  • NO side campaigners looking for Eurobonds? Do you even understand how Eurobonds would work? Because if you were against the Fiscal Treaty with its minimum set of restrictions, that would only be in the ha’penny place compared to what would be required for centrally issued Eurobonds.

    Yes it would means lower interest rates for Ireland as it currently stands, but it would require full fiscal untion for it to happen. So goodbye low rate of corporation tax for a starter and goodbye to any independence whatsoever on setting borrowing and spending requirements.

    Of course once again all people see here is what’s in it for Ireland without even thinking about what Ireland might have to give in order to get. But I bet once that reality hit home the vast majority of NO side people would be out screaming against Eurobonds in a big way. Who knows they might even find themselves on the same side of the argument as Angela Merkel. Now that would be interesting!

    Reply
  • Apostrophe crime in 2nd paragraph – “country’s” should be “countries”. I’m a sad grammar pedant with no life, sorry!

    Reply
  • Thank you for your thanks on my yes vote it’s about time two.

    Reply
  • Wicked looking

    Reply
  • Eh too true left, I am well aware of the marshal plan. My comment was to somebody else’s inaccurate comment.

    Reply

Add New Comment