Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

EU criticised over enforcement of Microsoft’s promise of web browser choice

The EU has been criticised for failing to enforce a commitment made by Microsoft to offer users a choice of internet browser for which the US tech giant was fined €561 million yesterday.

Image: Niall Carson/PA Wire/Press Association Images

THE EU HAS fined Microsoft €561 million for failing to provide customers with a choice of Internet browser, as the tech giant had promised.

But the EU itself has been criticised with claims that it had not done its job properly by allowing the US giant to monitor its own commitments.

EU Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia said this was the first time a company had been fined for failing to live up to commitments it had made to satisfy an EU complaint, making it a “very serious infringement.”

Almunia stressed that in 2009, Microsoft had given a cast-iron vow to offer clients a web browser choice through to 2014 after complaints about the then-dominance of its Windows Explorer product.

“Legally binding commitments reached in anti-trust decisions play a very important role in our enforcement policy because they allow for rapid solutions to competition problems,” Almunia said in a statement.

“Such decisions require strict compliance. A failure to comply is a very serious infringement that must be sanctioned accordingly.”

A Commission probe showed that during the roll-out of Windows 7, Microsoft failed to offer the choice screen for the period May 2011 to July 2012, affecting some 15 million computer buyers.

Asked several times at a press conference why the Commission had not picked up on the problem at the time, Almunia said that it was Microsoft itself which was in charge of monitoring its commitments and reporting to the EU.

“The monitoring trustee was Microsoft … in 2009 we were perhaps more naive than we are today,” he said, adding that the Commission was only made aware of the problem after a complaint since the company did not mention it.

Closer monitoring

In future, such commitments would be monitored much more closely, said Almunia, who took up his post in 2010.

Officials will have to be “very careful about how they design the monitoring of (company) commitments … I don’t want this to be repeated in the future,” he said.

Wednesday’s action was intended to “deter those who may be tempted in the future not to meet the commitments they made,” he added.

Microsoft acknowledged the failure on Wednesday, which it put down to technical problems.

“We take full responsibility for the technical error that caused this problem and have apologised for it,” the company said, adding that it would do all in its power to avoid any repeat.

From July 2012, Microsoft complied with the web choice requirement and Almunia said the company had indicated it would make up the 14 months of lost time.

Wednesday’s decision comes as the Commission reviews proposals from Internet giant Google aimed at ending a probe into its dominance of online search advertising platforms.

Critics say Google controls about 70 percent of the Internet search market, and the advertising that goes with it.

The US regulator said last month it lacked a legal basis to bring a case against Google but had won commitments from the company to end its “most troubling” practices.

Almunia said the EU probe into Google was continuing and declined to be drawn further. The single biggest EU anti-trust fine was against computer chip-maker Intel at €1.06 billion in 2009.

- © AFP, 2013

Read: Goodbye Hotmail, hello Microsoft Outlook

Read next:

Comments (26 Comments)

  • The only thing Internet Explorer is good for is downloading another browser.

    Reply
  • Are apple and samsung bound by the same rules re smartphones i.e. offering a choice of web browsers/email clients on initial boot?

    Reply
    • Barry 07/03/13 #

      Nope, but then the market is/was different.

      Windows shipped on the vast majority of PC’s that were sold throughout 90′s and up until when finally tablets and the likes started eating into their sales.

      With smartphones people have choice, with PC’s during many years people didn’t have any real choice. Its not like for like.

      Reply
    • They jave the same choice as smartphone users – simple google search for the browser of your choice. Even back in the mid 90s there was plenty of choice. This just seems like spoonfeeding ignorant consumers at the detriment of one the eu’s biggest companies

      Reply
    • Barry 07/03/13 #

      Alan, people didn’t know any better.

      I still know people that think Internet Explorer IS the internet on a Windows pc, they don’t know that you can get different web browsers with different features.

      the EU is completely right in relation to this decision, Microsoft had a monopoly and its been factually proven they very aggressively and illegally went after the competition in every way they could during the browser war days. They wanted Netscape dead as a browser choice.

      Its only with the rise of Firefox and in more recent years Opera, Chrome and Safari that Internet Explorer’s market share was finally affected in a meaningful way.

      Reply
    • What so microsoft get fined because people were too dumb to type “google chrome download” into Internet explorer?

      Reply
    • Dean 07/03/13 #

      The initial complaint was that MS stopped computer manufacturers such as IBM, Dell etc from putting other browsers on the computers in the first place. Since many smartphones contain network specific firmware (apart from Apple devices) there is nothing stopping them from putting on other browsers.

      Apple could potentially be in trouble for the same reason as MS were but since they do not have near the same monopoly that MS had back in the day it is unlikely to happen.

      Reply
    • Yes. You can change it in settings, google, yahoo and poop (sorry I meant Bing)

      Reply
  • The fine of €561 million…who gets this money?

    Reply
  • Google and Facebook, have you heard of Adblock? It’s out of this world! Best piece of software i’ve installed in a long time, was searching through Dogpile (great search engine btw) and found it.

    Reply
    • Again – Using software such as AdBlock means that websites, like The Journal, cannot show ads on their pages and cannot make money, meaning they may have to charge you for access in the future.

      If you want the websites you like to remain free, using software such as AdBlock is a bad idea.

      Reply
    • And if they charge we can move elsewhere. I wouldn’t be without AdBlock on laptop. The first thing I do when I get a new phone is root it and stick on AdAway.

      Reply
    • Cpm 07/03/13 #

      @Stephen – once sites start using less intrusive and obnoxious forms of advertising I’ll switch adBlock off. While they use crap like takeover ads, unicast ads, floating ads etc. it stays on.

      Reply
    • I believe TheJournals new form of advertising that they launched last week is not affected by AdBlocker. These ads are articles produced by the brands themselves. I think IKEA was the first to use the service.

      Reply
  • I think there is a typo. Should be internet explorer not windows explorer

    Reply
  • I can’t understand what the problem is, if your get a PC with an operating system and some free software isn’t that a bonus? Ms windows comes with things like paint, movie maker , notepad etc.
    You can use or download an alternative .
    If windows could only use Internet Explorer that would be cause for concern.
    My Volkswagen came with Michelin tyres and I wasn’t given a choice of installing an alternative !!

    Reply
  • Miller 07/03/13 #

    They will let some FTE staff go now to tidy up this loss on their P&L reports…..horrible company

    Reply
  • I find it quite strange that Microsoft are blaming this on a technical error, weren’t they fined $1m per day for every day they included IE in Windows as it was unfair advantage over Netscape?
    That was back in the 90s, you’d think if they actually gave a toss they’d have got round to fixing it by now..

    Reply
  • a friend of mine got a laptop with windows 8, unbelievably non user friendly, they tried to copy Apple but as usual – lets confuse the user. they’re now trying to put windows 7 on it or else return the laptop.

    Reply
    • Barry 07/03/13 #

      I tried Windows 8 and I have to say its awful as well.

      Finally last year I made the final jump from Windows.

      Devices in my house are now made up of XBMC (Linux), Netbook (Easypeasy os – Linux), iMac (OSX), Phone (Android) and MacBook (OSX). On these devices Firefox or Chrome are used for browsing.

      Finally had enough with Windows so replaced my desktop with a iMac. Not looked back since.

      Replaced Windows on my wifes netbook with Linux and she loves it, never has any issues with it compared to Windows and even knows how to run updates on it….something I didn’t even have to show her how to do! Extremely user-friendly OS for Netbooks – http://www.geteasypeasy.com/

      Reply
    • Windows 8 metro interface is shocking unless you’ve got a touch screen but it is far quicker than Windows 7. Do a Google search and you will find lots of companies offering programmes which bring back the win 7 style desktop and start button on win 8.

      Reply
    • Cpm 07/03/13 #

      @ Richard http://www.classicshell.net/ is great

      Reply
    • I think I’m one of the few people who like windows 8 then. It’s definitely trying for the osx vibe but that’s no bad thing really. It also reminds a bit of jolicloud os (Linux district) which I actually prefer but win 8 is fine. I think it’s put a lot of long term windows users off because it is so different but if you spend a bit if time with and your used to using other os’s like osx or various Linux flavours its not such a huge leap really. It’s ironic that by trying to make it more user friendly they’ve put off so many people…

      Reply
    • Yeah people enjoy complaining about stuff like browsers and OSs so they sound like they know what their talking about. IE 10 is literally identical to Chrome, W8 is identical to 7 with the added touch features, faster running speeds and increased functionality, oh yeah and it’s dirt cheap, and you don’t need an anti virus for it (it’s built in)

      Reply
    • He won’t get his money back as its advertised windows 8 installed, I enjoy windows 8 as it has apps, so instead of going into browser and searching for Facebook, then new tab for you tube and one for Netflix, all I do is hit the necessary button and I’m on that site. Although I know it’s not for everyone but its still advertised as windows 8 preloaded. If he buys windows 7 he can install it on a new partition.

      Reply

Add New Comment