Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Winfried Rothermel/AP

Germany's top court approves permanent Eurozone bailout fund

The ruling may mean the Dáil will need another vote on approving it – but also give it a vote on increasing its size in future.

GERMANY’S TOP COURT has rejected attempts from opponents of the proposed permanent Eurozone bailout fund to stop the country from ratifying the treaty that establishes it – clearing the way for the Eurozone’s largest economy to participate in the ruling.

The Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe dismissed applications from a coalition of eurosceptics who had tried to stop President Joachim Gauck from ratifying the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) treaty, and also the Fiscal Compact deal.

The ruling means Gauck can now ratify the Fiscal Compact on Germany’s behalf – but put conditions on Germany’s approval of the ESM, saying the country’s liability to the fund must be explicitly capped within the Treaty itself.

Though the ruling is welcome – as it does not put a permanent roadblock on the overall plan of European leaders to create a permanent bailout fund to aid stricken members – it means that other countries may have to re-ratify the treaty, or approve amendments to it, so that the ESM can come into effect.

Because the wording of the treaty must be identical in each participating country, the explicit limit to Germany’s contributions – which make up 27.146 per cent of the entire fund – may now mean that Ireland and the other 13 countries which had already ratified it will be forced into approving amendments.

This would also mean that any attempts to increase the size of the fund – which could otherwise be increased simply by the unanimous agreement of the participating governments – would need parliamentary approval, adding another layer of decision-making to the process.

In a separate decision, the court also rejected complaints that the European Central Bank’s programme of buying eurozone countries’ bonds was in breach of its mandate – removing another potential legal obstacle to the ECB plans which could kick in for Ireland when it emerges from the bailout programme.

Read: German ESM ruling: Foreign minister confident of treaty approval

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
24 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Buckley
    Favourite Paul Buckley
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 9:22 AM

    Right lads, I’m outta here, all goes downhill from here!! Last one out, knock off the lights.

    32
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Terry Turner
    Favourite Terry Turner
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 9:33 AM

    What is bad about that? Just curious.

    29
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sean Hyland
    Favourite Sean Hyland
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 9:40 AM

    It’s all about the conditions….just the conditions.

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Brian Houlihan
    Favourite Brian Houlihan
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 9:43 AM

    Nein!

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Klaus Störtebeker
    Favourite Klaus Störtebeker
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 8:27 PM

    Why? Putting a upper limit on Germany’s contribution will not affect Ireland, not unless Ireland needs another bail-out. It just means that once the ESM is empty, Germany won’t be automatically be forced to refill it.very sensible. The Irish people should be force their government to also create a cap to their contributions to protect their people.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Damocles
    Favourite Damocles
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 9:51 AM

    If Ireland has to re-ratify it does that mean another referendum?

    I’m guessing it doesn’t.

    Should it?

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute vv7k7Z3c
    Favourite vv7k7Z3c
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 9:56 AM

    It’s only the ESM Treaty that needs to be amended, so it’s only the ESM Treaty that we need to re-ratify. That was approved by the Oireachtas and was deemed not to need a referendum (Thomas Pringle went to the Supreme Court to try and get one but his claim was rejected).

    Basically what we’d need to do is repeat the ratification of the ESM, which is just have another vote in the Dáil and Seanad.

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kerry Blake
    Favourite Kerry Blake
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 9:58 AM

    I guess because it’s an amendment to a treaty we already have approved it probably means a new referendum is not required.

    Should it? Does it matter? We all know we will continue voting until we get the correct result as previous referendums have shown.

    5
    See 7 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ghandi O Hagen
    Favourite Ghandi O Hagen
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 10:03 AM

    Yes it will mean another referendum,if the treaty has to be the same in all participating states then the restrictions outlined by the German constitutional court e.g (a cap on Germany’s contribution to the fund) will have to be accepted by all and be part of the new treaty or whatever they choose to call it.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Norman Hunter
    Favourite Norman Hunter
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 10:04 AM

    @Gavan has the Supreme court not refered some matters from the Pringle challenge to the ECJ?

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Damocles
    Favourite Damocles
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 10:04 AM

    That was a very quick and thorough response, Gavan.

    It’s almost as if you were poised, waiting for someone to ask.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute vv7k7Z3c
    Favourite vv7k7Z3c
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 10:10 AM

    @Ghandi: We didn’t hold a referendum on it in the first place, so we don’t need to hold another one.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute P Ni Riogain
    Favourite P Ni Riogain
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 10:11 AM

    Pringle action in Supreme Court has gone to ECJ as Norman pointed out. Will be interesting to see implications of that next year. See http://www.ejiltalk.org/dublin-karlsruhe-and-luxembourg-in-dialogue/

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute vv7k7Z3c
    Favourite vv7k7Z3c
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 10:12 AM

    @Norman: As I understand it there were a few arms to Pringle’s claim, including (separately) whether Ireland needed a referendum, and whether the ESM Treaty was compatible with existing EU treaties.

    From what I’m aware it rejected the first one, but has adjourned the second until it gets advice from the ECJ. The ECJ is scheduled to hear the case on October 23.

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Norman Hunter
    Favourite Norman Hunter
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 10:20 AM

    @Gavan thanks for the answer.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kevin O'Sullivan
    Favourite Kevin O'Sullivan
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 11:57 AM

    So much for the Germans supposedly going to throw out the treaty, according to lefties in the last discussion(s) on the treaty. Looks like its all above board.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eileen Gabbett
    Favourite Eileen Gabbett
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 9:54 AM

    Here we go again …. Will this mean another referendum ?

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Justin Gillespie
    Favourite Justin Gillespie
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 10:03 AM

    No

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mick Collins
    Favourite Mick Collins
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 10:07 AM

    You never voted on it yet so why would there be a referendum ? A vote in the Dail on a small amendment is all that will now be required. This is excellent news for the Eurozone.

    6
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eileen Gabbett
    Favourite Eileen Gabbett
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 11:32 AM

    Thanks Justin .

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute P Ni Riogain
    Favourite P Ni Riogain
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 10:21 AM

    Pringle request for an injunction was rejected by Supreme Court but questions were referred to European Court which have yet to be decided on.

    from FT – http://url.ie/fw1m

    “… the Irish Supreme Court refused a legal injunction sought by Mr Pringle, which enabled Dublin to press ahead and ratify the ESM treaty. However, the court asked the ECJ to provide legal guidance on whether the ESM is in breach of EU law.

    “There is a principle within the EU that if an issue is before the ECJ that could affect everyone else then implementation should be held off until it is resolved, “Mr Pringle told the Financial Times. “If the ECJ agrees with me then the ESM is not compatible with EU treaties and cannot come into force.”

    and
    http://www.ejiltalk.org/dublin-karlsruhe-and-luxembourg-in-dialogue/

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute TaleofTwoTreaties
    Favourite TaleofTwoTreaties
    Report
    Sep 15th 2012, 12:40 AM

    @Gavan thanks for the continuing discussion on this complex but crucial stuff. Anyone wanting a summary of the European Court case might find this link useful – http://taleoftwotreaties.tumblr.com/ECJupdate.

    Thomas Pringle’s legal ‘Observations’ have now been filed with the European Court and the hearing as you say is set for 23 October.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tom Newell
    Favourite Tom Newell
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 7:48 PM

    the poor german taxpayers kiss goodbye to more cash cos unlike the easily led Irish government I can’t see many other citizens in countries allow there governments borrow huge cash from the esm or whatever ya call it then force austerity in order to pay back debts of bankers like we got sucked into doing…..

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Klaus Störtebeker
    Favourite Klaus Störtebeker
    Report
    Sep 12th 2012, 8:53 PM

    @ Tom – the ESM Treaty has passed on condition that there is a maximum limit to what the German taxpayers gives into the fund, so what you are saying was to be true but now will not be true.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds