We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
THE IRISH GOVERNMENT has been handed a significant pre-Budget boost after the European Union’s highest court indicated it was likely to reject a challenge from the European Commission about how Ireland implements a European VAT directive.
The European Commission had initiated action against Ireland, claiming it was in breach of an 2006 directive by allowing non-taxable entities to be grouped together with taxable ones for the purposes of paying VAT.
Ireland groups individual corporate entities and their holding companies together for the purposes of charging VAT, even though holding companies are exempt from VAT because they do not directly engage in trading themselves.
This is because holding companies can hold or command the assets of their subsidiaries, and can therefore be liable if one of its subsidiaries goes bust.
However, the European Commission had claimed that this was in breach of a directive agreed by heads of state in 2006, and implemented in 2007, and had sought an order from the ECJ that Ireland abandon its policy of grouping taxable and non-taxable bodies together.
The case was heard at the court in Luxembourg in September, and a full ruling is not expected until next year – but an advocate-general of the court has issued an opinion on the case in which they find that Ireland is not in breach of the directive.
The opinion, issued yesterday, finds it is “not an anomaly that non‑taxable persons can belong to a VAT group”.
“This is so because any taxable person may be engaged in activities falling within the scope of VAT and activities falling outside of the scope of VAT,” the opinion says.
The opinion is not binding upon the justices of the court when they reach their final ruling, but an advocate-general’s opinion is almost always accepted and concurred with by the judges issuing their final ruling.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
What about VRT?
Some say it is an illegal tax.
Did I not read a couple of years ago that someone had taken a case to Europe on that? May be mistaken though. (Frequently am ;))
Gavan help please??
As far as I remember it is illegal, it was found illegal, we pay a fine every year, BUT the revenue from the illegal tax far exceeds the fine.
should read big companies get pre budget good news not the average worker
That would be a uninteresting headline! Better to hype than be factual (sorry Gavan). This non binding ruling has very little to to do with the ordinary man or his burden in this budget.
Unfortunately they have to shaft us with other taxes like VRT because there is simply not enough of a tax intake from PAYE to run the country, never has been.
I thought European Courts just did what Europe told them? This is an outrage! Who dare they do the opposite to what is thought!
Any profession can under-declare their sales tax if they suspect the government is squandering other people’s money on the public sector wages or the bondholders.
have your say