Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Ireland already has some medical deserts - and it’s been getting worse
Quiz: How much do you know about green things?
Tánaiste says Conor McGregor 'doesn't speak for Ireland' as MMA fighter arrives at White House
Itsuo Inouye/AP/Press Association Images
Explainer
After the global financial crisis, why are rating agencies still trusted?
Credit rating agencies were widely criticised in the aftermath of the financial crisis in 2008 but they continue to hold huge sway when it comes to sovereign ratings. Now the EU is looking to curb that influence. TheJournal.ie investigates…
The effect on the global economy was seismic as stocks fell and the markets remained volatile in the days that followed. Similarly the same agency, known simply as S&P, caused an upset in the markets when it decided to downgrade France’s AAA rating earlier this year.
When the US was downgraded, president Barack Obama hit back furiously while more recently the French downgrade and that of other European countries drew an angry response from the European Economic Commissioner Olli Rehn who slammed S&P and the inconsistencies of credit ratings.
Where it all began
How did we get here? How did we come to a point where the decision of one organisation could have such far-reaching and potentially devastating financial consequences for companies, banks, and entire countries as well as generate such anger amongst prominent world leaders?
Briefly, the foundation of such agencies came at the time of the construction of the Transcontinental Railroad in the US where investors on one side of the country wanted to gauge just how reliable those constructing projects on the other side of the country were. So was born the book of financial details about rail operators which assessed their creditworthiness. First Henry Poor’s version, later John Moody and then John Fitch.
The kind of power, influence and authority which the three main agencies – Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch – hold now was derived primarily from the stock market crash of 1929 and subsequent Great Depression which prompted the US government to monitor the quality of bonds that banks invested in.
They did this through effectively outsourcing the assessment of creditworthiness to the rating agencies and as the years progressed the three big players took on a more and more important role.
In 1996, the highly-regarded American journalist and author Thomas Friedman noted:
There are two superpowers in the world today in my opinion. There’s the United States and there’s Moody’s Bond Rating Service. The United States can destroy you by dropping bombs, and Moody’s can destroy you by downgrading your bonds. And believe me, it’s not clear sometimes who’s more powerful.
The problem
In the 2000s, particularly in the US, the number of bonds and financial products that received a AAA rating multiplied massively. Of particular note was the numerous mortgage-backed securities that received a top rating from one of the three main agencies. A US congressional committee later found that Moody’s and S&P inflated the credit ratings of such products prior to the financial crisis.
Why such ratings were given to products that later transpired to be less than creditworthy is the subject of much controversy. Broadly, the agencies say they would have acted in “good faith” based on information given to them by the issuers they were rating.
But the Oscar-winning documentary Inside Job also noted the extent to which the agencies were seen to be in the pockets of those whom they were supposed to be independently rating:
This was starkly highlighted by the disclosures of a former Moody’s senior analyst, William Harrington, last August when he told the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the US that the agency was being paid by the same banks and companies whose securities it was supposed to objectively rate.
This sort of funding model and the extent to which the agencies essentially got it wrong prior to the sub-prime mortgage crisis and subsequent global financial meltdown makes it all the more puzzling to many as to why these same credit rating agencies continue to retain such trust.
Speaking to TheJournal.ie Independent TD Shane Ross noted:
A lot of their funding comes from the banks and that is the fundamental flaw with them. They are hugely influential despite that which is a bit of a puzzle.
He added: “[In Ireland] they were behind the curve by a long way. Quite often you see situations where markets are well ahead of the ratings agencies and that was certainly the case with the Irish banks. The markets were selling a lot of the bank shares before the ratings agencies had downgraded them.”
Last year, a survey of chartered financial analysts in Canada found that 71 per cent of them believed that CRAs had played a key role in the financial crisis while 85.
Institutional role
In the aftermath of the financial crisis, rating agencies promised reforms and carried out some but maintained their view that their rating was always an opinion. In a document outlining the benefits of its work, S&P states several times that its view is “independent” and cautions that “investors do not, and should not, base investment decisions solely on ratings”.
Advertisement
But in many cases investors did. Why? The economist Ha-Joon Chang notes that in the case of Europe, eurozone countries installed financial regulatory structures that are heavily dependent on the verdict of credit rating agencies. Writing for the Guardian earlier this year he outlined the issue:
We measure the capital bases of financial institutions, which determine their abilities to lend, by weighting the assets they own by their respective credit ratings. We also demand that certain financial institutions (eg pension funds, insurance companies) cannot own assets with below a certain minimum credit rating. All well intentioned, but it is no big surprise that such regulatory structure makes the ratings agencies highly influential.
The EU’s Internal Market Commissioner Michel Barnier is even more outspoken. His spokesperson, Chantal Hughes, told TheJournal.ie: “We have in our legislation at European and at national level, and even at global level given a de-facto institutional role to credit rating agencies.”
And yet agencies like S&P sounds a cautionary note in its briefing document, stating that its ratings “are not investment advice and only cover one aspect of investment risk – the risk of default.”
We know a little bit about defaults. Some in Ireland argue it is what we should do in order to free ourselves from austerity. While Greece technically already has defaulted on its debt obligations. Indeed, in February S&P cut Greece’s rating to ‘selective default’ after Athens imposed losses of as much as 70 per cent on some of its bondholders.
‘Ahead of the crowd’
S&P’s rating could be considered to be fairly reflective of the current situation in Greece. It’s not just Greece, Italy’s debt mountain and the political turmoil in the final days of Silvio Berlusconi’s regime led to it being downgraded.
While it could be argued that with the US’s failure to deal with its colossal debt it was inevitable that S&P took the drastic step that it did in downgrading it even in the face of huge criticism from the Obama administration and others.
The anonymous author of the respected NAMA Wine Lake blog believes that credit rating agencies have done a good job in the area of sovereign ratings in recent months:
[They] have displayed courage in ignoring the criticism of EU governments. The Greek situation has been particularly telling with the agencies turning out to be spot on despite severe criticism from the EU and Greece. In general they are inches ahead of the crowd but sometimes, that’s enough.
It will come as little surprise that Moody’s views its sovereign ratings as vital.
In a brief statement to TheJournal.ie it said: “For markets to function efficiently there needs to be a free flow of information, including views on credit risk, from CRAs and others.”
Reforms
But it is Commissioner Barnier’s belief that the credit rating agencies have made mistakes in the past and that the framework in which they operate has not been “sufficiently clear or tough”, according to his spokesperson.
“The biggest objective in all those proposals is to reduce the reliance on CRAs,” Chantal Hughes told TheJournal.ie. She added: “[There] needs to be more transparency and rigorousness. That’s why we have made the proposals.”
The proposals, which the Commission hopes are in place by some time next year, are broadly aimed at doing four things:
Ensuring that financial institutions do not “blindly rely” on credit ratings when determining where they invest.
That agencies are more transparent about their reasons for a particular sovereign rating and that they rate every six months, as opposed to every 12.
That companies issuing financial products rotate every three years between the agencies that rate then to eliminate any conflicts of interest and encourage competition.
That CRAs are more accountable for the ratings they provide and that in cases where investors bring claims before the courts, the burden of proof is on the CRA.
Unsurprisingly this has not gone down well with the credit rating agencies who vary in the degree to which they are unhappy with the proposals. TheJournal.ie approached all three of the main agencies to discuss the proposed reforms but all declined to be interviewed.
In its statement Moody’s said of the proposed reforms, known as CRA3, that:
As currently drafted, CRA3 will not improve ratings quality but it will damage credit access for European companies and will negatively impact economic growth and job creation. Moody’s believes constructive alternatives exist, including reducing regulatory reliance on ratings and encouraging further debate on sovereign credit risk.
For all three one of the main sticking points is the idea that financial institutions and others reliant on agencies rotate which one they use to rate their products. This “would undermine the stability and continuity of ratings and disrupt European companies’ access to global capital markets,” according to S&P.
Fitch group managing director, Paul Taylor was quoted as saying in the Financial Times that CRA3 “has a handful of proposals that are very damaging” including the rotation idea.
Nonetheless, at a summit of EU finance ministers in Denmark last month, leaders agreed to the idea that companies rotate rating agencies to prevent conflicts of interest and encourage competition in the sector. An actual law is some way off, but that was a sign of considerable progress.
What hope for the reforms?
But what hope have such reforms got of making any difference? Shane Ross is sceptical: “The motivation behind the EU doing it is purely and utterly selfish. They are trying to get a tamer agency which produces the kind of results they want.”
Ross believes that the current trio of ratings agencies are so utterly flawed in their funding and their history that there is little point to having them any more: ”I think they are a bad brand, but the markets look to them still. That is the kind of conundrum there. They are a discredited brand because they got it wrong for so long but the markets are still influenced by what they say,” he said.
The European Commission’s aim is to solve that condundrum by reducing the markets’ reliance on the CRAs’ verdict. Chantal Hughes said:
We’ve given the credit rating agencies an enormously important role in our legislation and what we want to ensure is that they can do their job properly but that their opinion becomes one opinion amongst many others. Not the be all and end all.
Ross believes that the current crop of rating agencies have become so “irreparably damaged” that there is room yet for an “objective credit rating agency to emerge.”
But there are no indications that anything of the sort is in the offing. Meaning the reliance on Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard and Poor’s will continue for the foreseeable future.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
Our Explainer articles bring context and explanations in plain language to help make sense of complex issues.
We're asking readers like you to support us so we can continue to provide helpful context to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay.
If These parasitic agencies had their contribution to the global financial crisis rated it would be a triple A +.it is extraordinary that these dregs of morality ,along with the likes of Goldman Sachs can still hold sway in the the financial system and I say this as a firm believer in capitalism ! Great article Btw
True. And why are we still hearing about their pronouncements on the news? Laziness from journalists, governments and bankers? If they were any good they’d be called “Excellent & Loaded” anyway
Only because the credit agencies base their ratings on factual information rather than government propaganda and governments can’t stand anyone who isn’t playing ball.
Yes, they “eventually” started doing their Job, after playing their part in wrecking the world’s economy. Where was their “Data” when they gave triple A ratings to Billions of Dollars of subprime mortgages wrapped other good loans in the US. Of course this was insured by AIG in the form CDS’ that brought the biggest insurer on the planet to its knees, 85 billion to bail out Bear sterns ,200 Billion to bail out Fannie Mae /Freddie Mac , all because of subprime. Yes the banks were reckless but I wonder what their rating had been??? mmm. I suppose you heard there excuse in the congressional hearings, well of course you didn’t, anyway, it was that “we only give advice/guidance, it’s really up the institution what they do with it.
This is a country where there is now nearly a million people living in tents. And the behaviour off the Rating agencies, Financial was morally repugnant. Then we have monkey talk from the likes of you !
In contrast to member countries of the Eurozone, the US remains the sovereign issuer of its own (free floating) currency and because of this fact can never go bankrupt or default on debt denominated in US$.
When S&P downgraded US gov debt, thru’ some combination of political ideology & stupidity, the market interest rate did precisely nothing – +nada+. Indeed, given the even low rate of inflation the US gov can sell every $ of its debt, still, at an even lower rate of interest. Yes, buyers of US gov debt are actually +paying+ to hold it when inflation is taken into account.
Whilst the variously fraudulent, corrupt & ideologically motivated behaviour of the ratings agencies is a key (& unaddressed) part of the cause of the financial meltdown, it is only the tip of the iceberg.
Besides the control fraud (cf former US regulator William K Black) of the financial institutions, both in the US and Europe, we should also be demanding examination of the endemically flawed macro economics thinking that still ignores the effect of debt – indeed the function of banking itself – in its modelling of national economies. Ever wondered why the mainstream of economics had no clue the crisis was coming mere weeks before the crash? Or why the Eurozone is getting worse not better 5 years later?
Irish economists & commentators (with the exception of Dublin based writer Philip Pilkington) continue to be absolutely lamentable on these vital issues. Of course, with secure 6 figure salaries & guaranteed fat pensions, +they+ are not suffering are they?
If you want to find the facts of the intellectual bankruptcy endemic in mainstream macro economics (macro, because national economics is profoundly not like your household or business, despite all the BS from media etc. implying it is) you need to look outside Ireland. Readily available practical solutions are also discussed. (Yes, there are solutions that do not involve massive unemployment for decades & beyond.)
It takes a little time and study to discover the truth in macro economics. But surely we owe it to our children to find out, if not for ourselves. We will not be gifted the solutions that are readily available. The present system is a lie from start to finish, that serves to enrich the top few percent, at the expense of the rest of us, thru’ the creation of both booms & busts.
A good article by Hugh O’Connell here, but there is so much more needs fundamental examination & reform including the Euro structure itself.
S&P are number crunchers that’s all, they do what they do for their clients. Governments oversee financial regulation and dictate financial policy, so stop shooting the messenger! It’s beginning to sound like late Weimar Germany around here with the level of wingnut economic theory being flung about. Corruption and cronyism in politics, get-rich-quick economic policy, war mongering abroad, all must be paid for at the end and the chickens have come home to roost for America.
People need to understand that Ratings Agencies use historical data (good or bad) so they are after-the-fact telling us what is wrong. They cannot predict. The reason they are still viewed as important is that the prospectuses of funds tends to state that the funds cannot invest in shares/stocks etc less than X or Y rating which is purely a marketing exercise. They serve no real purpose other than marketing/political purposes and anyone who uses them as a benchmark is crazy/delusional.
Ireland already has some medical deserts - and it’s been getting worse
Maria Delaney
2 hrs ago
1.4k
17
St Patrick's Day
Quiz: How much do you know about green things?
4 hrs ago
10.7k
United States
Tánaiste says Conor McGregor 'doesn't speak for Ireland' as MMA fighter arrives at White House
Updated
10 hrs ago
64.1k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 157 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 109 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 141 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 111 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 132 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 60 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 38 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 90 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 97 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 86 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 68 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say