Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Why has Microsoft taken a $6.2billion hit?

The company hasn’t suffered a quarterly loss in 20 years – but it looks like it will this quarter. What is the reason behind this?

Image: AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, file

MICROSOFT IS ABSORBING a $6.2 billion charge to reflect that one of the biggest deals in its 37-year history turned out to be a dud.

The non-cash charge could saddle Microsoft Corporation with a loss for its fiscal fourth quarter ended in June.

Analysts polled by FactSet had predicted Microsoft would earn about $5.3 billion for the period. The company hasn’t suffered a quarterly loss during the past 20 years, according to its website.

Microsoft is scheduled to release its latest quarterly results on July 19.

The world’s largest software maker blamed the setback on the disappointing performance of aQuantive. That’s an online advertising service that Microsoft bought for $6.3 billion in 2007 to mount a more serious challenge to one of its biggest rivals, Internet search leader Google Inc.

aQuantive

The aQuantive deal ranked as the most expensive deal in Microsoft’s history until it was eclipsed last year by the company’s $8.5 billion purchase of Internet video chat service Skype.

Microsoft’s $6.2 billion charge represents a sobering acknowledgement that aQuantive didn’t bring in as much online advertising revenue as envisioned, forcing management to write off most of the purchase price.

To add to Microsoft’s mortification, Google has been milking the acquisition of an aQuantive rival to widen its lead in the steadily growing online ad market. Google bought DoubleClick for $3.2 billion about eight months after Microsoft took control of aQuantive,

Since then, Google’s annual profit and advertising sales have more than doubled. Last year, Google earned $9.7 billion and collected $36.5 billion in ad revenue.

Losses

Microsoft’s online division has sustained losses totalling nearly $9 billion since the company bought aQuantive. The online division generated $2.5 billion in revenue during Microsoft’s fiscal 2011, just $54 million more than in fiscal 2007.

Although the online division has been faring slightly better in the past year, “the company’s expectations for future growth and profitability are lower than previous estimates,” Microsoft said in a statement.

Bing, a search engine that Microsoft unveiled four years ago, has been getting more usage, but most of its gains have come at the expense of a business partner, Yahoo Inc.

Microsoft’s search technology has been powering searches on Yahoo’s website for nearly two years, but that alliance hasn’t dented Google’s market share.

Windows 8

Google’s share of the US search advertising market has risen from 74 percent in 2010 to 78 percent this year, according to the research firm eMarketer. Meanwhile, Yahoo’s share US search advertising has fallen from 10 percent in 2010 to less than 5 percent this year while Microsoft’s cut has remained unchanged at 7 percent.

The revisions in Windows 8, expected to hit the market this autumn, are being counted on to help revive personal computer sales and establish Microsoft as a major player in the tablet computer market.

- Michael Liedtke

Read: Microsoft agrees $1.2 billion deal for Yammer acquisition>

Read next:

Comments (25 Comments)

  • Isn’t it amazing how a private company take a chance on buying something, they find out its a dud and write it down. I wonder why banks can’t do that?

    Reply
  • Paul 03/07/12 #

    Tried W8 Beta. Underwhelming. Think I’ll stick with my Mac and Lion

    Reply
  • I wonder what the write down on Skype and Yammer will be in the future?

    Reply
  • paul 03/07/12 #

    Microsoft need to up their game very soon. tick tock tick tock

    Reply
    • Mate, looking at all measures and products in the pipeline, they are going to clean up consoles soon, they’re going to dominate the tablet market (since nearly everything will be one) they’re phones should pick up but never dominate. They’ve upped they’re game years ago, this is the year it should start seeing fruit.

      Reply
    • paul 03/07/12 #

      @ Connor

      I completely forgot Xbox. win 8 looks like another vista, that might be a bit harsh. the win phone hasn’t made any significant dent as far as I know and there not even out of the traps in terms of the tablet. you obviously know something I don’t and just for the record I aint an apple fan boy either :)

      Reply
    • Well the thinking is fairly simple, IPads have barely made a dent in the PC market yet soon every single PC sold will be a tablet. Also they just announced they’re “upgrade” plans for Win8. All PCs for the last decade can get an upgrade for 39$! As in like a round of pints. And as this gets more consumer recognition the same design language in Windows Phone will also get recogition.

      Phones absolutely have not made remotely enough impression but they have the money to wait out that fight and Nokia have easily the best cameras in the world on phones, when they trickle down to WPhone8 that will be enough with the software to really nail a corner of the market. Also they’ve announced security and productivity thingamabobs which position them to completely consume blackberrys marketshare, (someone has to).

      http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/06/why-windows-phone-8-means-the-blackberry-is-doomed/

      Now none of this is certain of course but they’ve too many chips lined up to not pull it off at this stage. Design-wise they’re almost definitely the most interesting in the marketplace, apple are easily the most boring at the moment, consumer fatigue will set in with they’re minimalism I think.

      Reply
    • @conor ‘Microsoft’, ‘decent’ and ‘design’ in the same sentence? Come on.

      Win 8 Mobile is the first half decent UI they have ever come out with but its barley that, I can’t see them catching up anytime soon. Going from zero presence to tablet domination won’t happen that quickly. My money says that the tablet will do about as well as the phone is doing.

      Reply
    • Interesting comments here.. I find myself agreeing and disagreeing with you Conor. For the record, I’m a massive Microsoft fan. Just about all my working career I’ve pinned my colors securely to their post and have been developing software successfully for years thanks to their fantastic array of products.

      I think what they did back in the original days to get market dominance over Apple was just genius.

      However, I can’t help but to feel there’s a big change happening in the whole space of O/S dominance purely thanks to the way in which the masses are connecting to the Net. I think the more people use Apple devices and Android powered devices the more eventually this will bleed into the way people interact with computers on the whole. The future/present is most definitely mobile, (smart phones and tablets running web and cloud based applications). I genuinely think Microsoft took their eye off this fact and have come out of the traps waaay too late this time. It’s going to really hurt them. I’d never write them off, they’re clever, but I really think there’s nothing in their current set of products or marketing strategies that’s going to get them back in the game. I really hope I’m wrong though! :)

      Oh and .. for the record.. I reckon Apple are going to have it tough too over the next 5 to 10 years. Their 4Gs phone and latest iPad tablets were just pure borefest products and to me, showed a laziness and contempt for their user base.

      At the moment my money is on an Google/Android powered world. Google are so crazily hungry for success and their drive is inspiring! Plus the fantastic support they’re getting from the different leading manufacturers….

      Reply
    • I’d be more of a Google guy myself. I literally use no Micrososft product. Linux on the PC. I’d have my money on Google for the mobile space but everyone is wildly underestimating the immovable monolith that is desktop computers. There are millions of business PCs in Ireland that will need to be replace in the next decade and there are no other options really and Google doesn’t even have a horse in that race.

      But in Consumer electronics Google will almost definitely dominate with only Microsoft being a challenger because of the implausibility of Apples prices coming down at all. Funnily enough Microsofts current wave of software is easily the most efficient (ie can run on the cheapest hardware) on the market. Anyway, I’m going to get off the Internet now….

      http://xkcd.com/386/

      Reply
    • Agreed Conor, desktop computing IS a massive space, and Microsoft have a crazy large dominance there. But I think this is all changing due to a fundamental infrastructure paradigm shift. It’s all going back to the thin client, fat server model, we’re just recreating the mainframe/dumb terminals system of age old times (i.e. 25 years ago!). When we’re all running our apps 100% in the cloud, then the client machine’s O/S will actually probably become pretty irrelevant and the money will be in just pure app development and data access. Look at Microsoft Office, they’re trying to switch everything to the server now.
      Such a setup then becomes ideally suited for all the different devices out there. People want to access their applications and data on their phones, tablets, utlra books and desktops.

      Reply
    • paul 04/07/12 #

      @ Connor

      thumbs up!

      Reply
  • Windows 8 also sucks for the PC.

    A lot of complaints (and I agree) are about the pre-win8 interface. The GUI (graphic user Interface) was suitable for PC’s prior to Win8. With Win8 that GUI on the pc can’t be changed for most users (there is professional hacks) back to pre-Win8 with consists of the standard bar at the bottom and your own wallpaper.

    If your a PC user, Windows 8 sucks as a GUI and is a more complicated mess.

    Reply
    • Yeah – the W8 Start screen only makes any sense if you have a touch screen of some kind.

      It’s fairly easy to ignore the Start screen and live on the desktop though.

      Reply
    • It doesn’t if you view the start screen as a bigger start menu, then it’s pretty easy.

      Reply
    • It’s pretty easy to get back to a GUI similar to Win 7. I’ve got it running on 3 machines and it loads far faster and runs quicker on each of them. Yes there are still things that need work but I suspect it will do very well.

      Reply
    • The same was said about the revised start menu in Vista. The same was said about the revised taskbar in Win7. The same was said about the ribbon interface in Office 2007. But all that criticism has disappeared as people adjusted and now barely use the desktop or menus anymore. This interface is the next logical step. Why would you bother changing from Windows 7 if Windows 8 is not different? And finally now MS can now no longer be accused of trying to rip off Apple :)

      Reply
  • pagan 03/07/12 #

    No doubt they will bring out a next generation Xbox360 as well as new Windows for pc.Looking forward to there new tablet.

    Reply
  • Rob Luce 13/07/12 #

    Macs & Lions suck lol

    Reply
  • Microsofts problem is that they want to be the best at everything. They need to realise that the should concentrate on the things they are good at. nnGame consoles, office software, their mobile os was pretty good (in my opinion) and surface looks decent.

    Reply
    • Well… It’s not a case of being the best at everything. it’s about bullet proofing their future. The PC (still 70 or 80% of their revenue) as we know it is dying and mobile and cloud communications are on the rise.

      In 10 years from now they will be dead if they don’t embrace the trends

      Reply
    • If Google stuck with just search we wouldn’t have Android, Gmail, etc… If Apple stuck with just standard computers we wouldn’t have iPhones, iPods, iPads…

      Reply
    • If Google stuck with just search we wouldn’t have Android, Gmail, etc… If Apple stuck with just standard computers we wouldn’t have iPhones, iPods, iPads… And don’t forget MS were actually quite late to the console business!

      Reply
  • How much of a hit have the Irish people taken throughout the years by having Microsoft,Google,HP,etc use the country as a tax avoidance haven?I think the rate normally paid is between 1-3% after all the accountants are done?

    Reply

Add New Comment