Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

Companies ‘fire their best workers during recessions’

High-skilled – but high wage-earners – are among those most likely to be let go, finds Columbia University research.

Image: Andrey Popov via Shutterstock

IT MAY SEEM counter-intuitive, but some of the first people to get let go in a recession are the smartest, hardest-working people. This counters the common idea that lower-skilled, lower-quality workers are the first to be let go and have the hardest time finding a new job.

Columbia University’s Andreas Mueller took a deep look at the data, and found that the unemployment pool shifts towards high-wage, high-skilled workers in recessions, and that they, have just as hard of a time finding a job as low-wage workers during recessions.

Among the people most likely to be let go are those with high wages compared to others with the same experience and education. They’re most likely paid more because they’re the most productive, but still get fired at higher rates.

A possible explanation is that higher-paid workers are overpaid or just got lucky. In another study (these are based on US figures), Mueller found that highly paid people with higher IQs, more proven ability, and higher non-cognitive (personality and emotional) scores are still more likely to be laid off. The highest-quality workers make up a higher share of the unemployed than is usually thought.

The biggest explanation, according to Mueller, are the credit crunches that result from recessions. Firms understand that their best workers will be essential to recovering and would like to keep them, but lower revenue and tight credit sometimes leave them with no choice but to fire some of their best people.

All of this goes to emphasize the point that recessions are actually one of the best times to hire, if you can afford it.

- Max Nisen

Published with permission from:

Business Insider
Business Insider is a business site with strong financial, media and tech focus.

Read next:

Comments (17 Comments)

  • tom 11/11/12 #

    an accountant crunching the numbers in attempt to balance the books doest have a column for highly skilled and productive on the excel sheet.

    Reply
  • It suggests that those at management level are overpaid, if they decide to get rid of the brightest and hardworking (ie those who are a threat to their longterm position).

    Reply
  • Patitas 11/11/12 #

    There is a subtle difference between higher paid and overpaid. Some employees get salaries that they should never have got in first place and in crisis times they are the first to exit.

    At country level, the same happened…Ireland offered a lot of benefits for people not to work to keep the troop happy and some citizens abused that by building a whole strategy around living off our taxes. They are also overpaid, but in a different way.

    The difference here is that private companies can not reduce the salaries of the people they want to keep. Exactly the opposite that the country is doing by increasing taxes of people who are still at work.

    A bit over simplified perhaps, but that’s what happen.

    Reply
    • “The difference here is that private companies can not reduce the salaries of the people they want to keep. ”

      ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

      they can do and have done, even twice in some cases, 10% cuts in 2009, another in 2010 and so on.
      of course we can chose not to accept it BUT hehe they’ll find other ways to ‘force’ you out i.e. increase your workload.

      Reply
  • I do not agree with this study. The best workers want to work.If the country is in recession then nobody is hiring. If the best workers are let go and there is nothing offering in this country they will leave the country. ..makes one realise that this recession is far from over.

    Reply
  • Unless you’re self employed, you should never do more than enough as you’ll never get the credit you deserve.

    Reply
    • tom 11/11/12 #

      while I don’t follow that rule myself it does appear to hold true.
      the additional unpaid hours and extra dedication often taken for granted and minamlist worker held in higher regard just for showing up.

      Reply
    • I am staggered by this attitude. I have never wanted to work with people who expect to be carried. Failure usually comes to companies whonhire people like this. It means that management are at fault for promoting expectations to be this low.

      Success in any profession requires more than your best. Any less is defeatist and ultimately leads to loss of business and leads to failure a self professed loss of jobs.

      This study suggests management should reconsider their options before making decisions that in the long run will harm the company.

      Within the public service I can understand this mentality but in the private sector it is a death sentence that only postpones the inevitable management, and ultimately, company failure

      Reply
    • @Waffler

      I must keep an eye out for your CV and bin it straight away.

      Its that paralysing attitude that needs to be rooted out and destroyed

      Reply
  • this article is spot on. I worked somewhere were a lot of the staff had been hard working and were there a good few years (including myself) and only received bare minimum increases in wages over the years, usually along with inflation etc. When they decided to restructure, they let go most of us that were earning only a euro more than staff that were just in the door. As a result, they were left with juvenile, incompetent, under trained under experienced staff, and because of this, they now have a constant staff turn around because the job isnt worth the peanuts they’re paid because it’s so stressful with no one having any real experience to deal with the business! needless to say, I’m happy I got off that sinking ship. The company then went on to REHIRE some of the fired staff because they realised what a f-up they made of the whole thing!!!

    Reply
  • Cheap labour is the name of the game x-(

    Reply
  • they don’t fire the good employees . they just give them very big pensions..

    Reply
    • Lamb 11/11/12 #

      Were talking about redundancies here. I’m not sure what else you’d call it when they get rid of people but ‘not giving them a very big pension’ doesn’t cut it. Our office got rid of 40% of the workforce. I assure you they weren’t all of retirement age.

      Reply

Add New Comment