Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

What recruiters look at during the 6 seconds they spend on your CV

The average recruiter is swamped with CVs – so they only get seconds to view each one. Here’s what they take in.

ALTHOUGH WE MAY never know why we didn’t get chosen for a job interview, a recent study is shedding some light on recruiters’ decision-making behaviour.

According to research by TheLadders, recruiters spend an average of ”six seconds before they make the initial ‘fit-or-no-fit’ decision” on candidates.

The study used a scientific technique called “eye tracking” on 30 professional recruiters and examined their eye movements during a 10-week period to “record and analyse where and how long someone focuses when digesting a piece of information or completing a task.”

In the short time that they spend with your resume, the study showed recruiters will look at:

  • your name
  • current title and company
  • current position start and end dates
  • previous title and company
  • previous position start and end dates
  • your education

The two resumes below include a heat map of recruiters’ eye movements. The one on the right was looked at more thoroughly than the one of the left because of its clear and concise format:

recruiters-resume

With such critical time constraints, you should make it easier for recruiters to find pertinent information by creating a resume with a clear visual hierarchy and don’t include distracting visuals.

As the study said, distracting visuals “reduced recruiters’ analytical capability and hampered decision-making” and kept them from “locating the most relevant information, like skills and experience.”

Read: TheJournal.ie‘s Careers Clinic columns >

Column: Stay positive, keep moving – the advice YOU gave me >

Published with permission from:

Business Insider
Business Insider is a business site with strong financial, media and tech focus.

Read next:

Comments (30 Comments)

  • There’s one way to get to the moon.
    Become an astronaut.

    Reply
  • mart_n 13/04/12 #

    Something similar happens when people visit websites. When designing pages these days, the “F” pattern that people naturally seek when viewing it is taken advantage of.

    http://www.usability.gov/articles/newsletter/pubs/032010news.html#fshape

    Reply
  • I’ve worked freelance for the past 10 years. My CV is my almost like my business card. I keep it concise, my more information on my previous 2 projects than the rest.
    The above article seems right to me. How long were you in your last 2 jobs, gives a good idea on your work ethic. If its a short term contract, then state that.
    Anyone can pick the wrong job or a job that doesnt suit them, But if you were only in those 2 jobs for a short time, it implies something else.
    Don’t really know why they needed to study this, it seems like common sense.

    Reply
  • I would normally look at the ones with photos and see if there are any hot chicks looking for work.

    Reply
  • Recruiters are idiots. This is what they’re paid a finders fee for? I could write software to pull that information they ‘scan’ for in about a day. They’d never know that though, what with them skimming over the detail which details whether or not I can do the job. Instead they focus on your employment history looking for job titles (meaningless) and big companies (doesn’t imply a better candidate).

    ‘Good news Mr/Mrs recruiting manager, I found an engineer with 5 years experience with a big multinational. Hey, his work experience is irrelevant to what you do, but the job title is the same, and if he’s good enough for them he’s good enough for you’

    Reply
    • Maybe you should write that program. It could make you a fortune.

      Reply
    • I agree. They should get a REAL job.

      Reply
    • Why are recruiters idiots exactly? Seem a bit harsh!

      Reply
    • what a rant!
      recruiters have software to look for key words in CV databases already…
      if u have the skills u have a good a chance as anyone to get selected for interview. if your not happy try a different agent. companies always have a couple of prefered suppliers for the same job.

      Reply
    • I’ll tell you why. There was an employer on Newstalk this morning complaining that he pays 22-24% commission on new hires for developers.

      I work in software and I can tell you I’ve never dealt with a recruiter who understood my work experience or qualifications. Granted, a technical recruiter may spend a little longer than 6 seconds on a CV, but this is just matching three letter acronyms and buzzwords between your CV and the job spec.

      This annoys me. My industry is awash with people who either don’t care or are incapable. Recruiters sifting through often fabricated CVs and pulling ‘matches’ does nothing to identify the quality candidates.

      But it’s a bit harsh, I agree, so I’m going to qualify my statement somewhat:
      IT recruiters are, by and large, idiots :)

      Reply
    • @Brian I’ve had no bad experience where I’ve answered a job ad. But that’s me honestly appraising my skills against a job spec, not the recruiter. My point was not about my CV being thrown out, that hasn’t happened to me since I was a graduate, because I’m not a chancer.

      I’m talking about their lack of domain knowledge for the industries they hire into. A technical recruiter should pre-interview for their frankly whopping commissions, not cut CVs based on some crappy lookup algorithm that offers no understanding of the relationship and relevance of different terms and acronyms.

      While its easy to spot someone with relevant (claimed) skills, it’s not so easy to spot those who don’t match perfectly, but have extremely relevant skills in different (but similar and portable) technologies. So the liar who embellishes knowledge of a topic in job spec tailored CVs makes the cut, while a far better candidate might get cut

      Reply
    • I’m a recruiter of sorts at the moment in a fairly average company, just to pay the bills for now. I was provided with no training on systems or techniques, I have been there for 3 months and nobody has made a single placement.
      There is a lot wrong with recruitment and in the time I have been there I have seen many instances of unprofessionalism.
      Hiring staff and HR people have often been difficult to deal with, lacking any real grasp of the roles they are hiring-same goes for most recruiters. They are essentially bottom feeders who know very little about any one thing but have stacks of buzz words and superlatives that you will hear plugging their extensive knowledge gaps.
      I am the most qualified person in the company but I am not given the chance to really use my specialist knowledge here. I could write a book about all the faults but I will spare you that for now.

      Reply
    • Excellent i totally agree with you!
      Recruiters i talked too did not know
      Have of what i do, try and explain
      Its futile !!!

      Reply
    • Totally agree with Ronan above. Recruiters are parasites, totally unnecessary, and completely unaware of the industry they are ‘recruiting for’. I work as an international lawyer in developing markets/economies and these idiots call me incessantly offering legal positions totally unrelated to my specialisations.

      They live off a cocktail of soundbites, buzzwords and bullshit. ‘Hey great move opportunity’ that will merely pocket them commission for flipping a few cvs and nothing else.

      This recession should kill off most of them please God. When the purse is empty, people are less inclined to feed these industrial parasites.

      Reply
  • “In the short time that they spend with your resume, the study showed recruiters will look at:
    your name
    current title and company
    current position start and end dates
    previous title and company
    previous position start and end dates
    your education”

    …………………………But if you only provide this much information it would get binned anyway!!!!!

    Reply
  • Recruiters and HR in this country are a joke! They don’t know their arse from their elbow when it comes to dealing with people’s CV’s or companies needs regarding staff.

    Reply
  • There is one way to get over CVs. Be self employed.

    Reply
  • I agree 90% are waffling bottom feeders, there’s a requirement for them though, at the moment anyway and at least until software can do the job better.

    Estate agents are also a pain to deal with. Why can’t we have a government run website tied in with the banks for bidding on property. That way everyone could see a bid, know its real (cos the bank would have pre-sanctioned the bid), that would stop lying or mislead estate agents costing people 10s of thousands. Then all you really need is a person to show you round the property.

    Reply
  • Recruiters have feelings too. Why can’t we all love each other and wish our fellow human beings well.

    Reply
  • As a relatively successful recruiter I have never spent only 6 seconds looking at a CV without good reason i.e. they are not relative to my area etc.

    Also CV screening is only the first step in the process and a CV does not get sent to an employer until much further down the line.

    Reply
  • So your name makes you more qualified? How so please explain, can’t wait to hear the reasons why!

    Reply
  • @TheJournal.ie do you not think it would be more beneficial for readers of your Careers Clinic Articles to work with experienced professionals who know the Irish market well and can provide valuable and useful advice?

    Reply
  • Dario Fo 14/04/12 #

    “What unusual shit you come up with” should be number 1.

    Reply
  • this is already happening, in my last recruitment role our company rarely used advertising in favour of sourcing people through social media etc.

    Reply
  • Oh my lawd Jesus ! Will you geeks ever get you a grip ! Ain’t know one give a shit about this crap ! Stop goin on with yo supercilious attitudes yo! Fo real ! Croneisha speaks ! Peace out

    Reply
  • Now u no!!!!!!!

    Reply

Add New Comment