Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

US Federal Reserve announces plan to buy more debt to boost economy

Analysts were not surprised by the move which essentially amounts to so-called quantitative easing.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke speaks during a news conference in Washington today.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke speaks during a news conference in Washington today.
Image: Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP/Press Association Images

THE US FEDERAL Reserve announced a new $40 billion (€30bn) a month bond-buying program today aimed at cutting long-term interest rates as it slashed its 2012 growth forecast.

And it signaled, without setting a specific target, that monetary easing efforts would remain in place until it sees substantial improvement in the US jobs market, where 8.1 per cent of Americans remain unemployed.

Pointing to continued weak growth and stagnation in the jobs market, the Fed said it would spend $40 billion on agency mortgage-backed securities each month in an open-ended operation targeted at boosting the moribund housing sector.

That would take the US central bank’s total monthly purchases, including ongoing programs, to $85 billion a month, the Fed said.

These actions “should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, support mortgage markets, and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative,” it said.

The Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s policy board, also pledged to keep its benchmark rate at the current near-zero level through mid-2015, at least six months longer than its earlier commitment.

“To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee expects that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the economic recovery strengthens,” it said.

“If the outlook for the labour market does not improve substantially, the Committee will continue its purchases of agency mortgage-backed securities, undertake additional asset purchases, and employ its other policy tools as appropriate until such improvement is achieved in a context of price stability.”

‘Grave concern’

Fed chairman Ben Bernanke told reporters that the country’s employment situation remained a “grave concern,” adding: “The weak job market should concern every American.”

The FOMC said that the economy continues to expand at a “moderate” pace, but it pointed to a slowdown in investment by businesses.

It cut its forecast for growth this year to 1.7-2.0 percent from the previous 1.9-2.4 percent range, though it predicted a pickup to 2.5-3.0 percent in 2013.

The FOMC said it was “concerned that, without further policy accommodation, economic growth might not be strong enough to generate sustained improvement in labor market conditions.”

It also noted some vulnerability of the US economy to ongoing strains in global financial markets, a reference mainly to the ongoing eurozone crisis.

It said it expected inflation to remain under control, staying at or below the Fed’s 2.0 per cent target.

After months of debating whether to embark on new stimulus, most of the 12-member FOMC seemed to fall in line with Bernanke’s worries that little ground was being made on the high jobless rate.

Two weeks ago, Bernanke also called stagnation in the labor market a “grave concern,” warning that “persistently high levels of unemployment will wreak structural damage on our economy that could last for many years.”

Unsurprised analysts

Analysts were not surprised by the Fed’s moves which, said UniCredit’s Harm Bandholz, followed clearly from the central bank’s analysis of the pace and details of the economy’s growth.

“Many Fed officials preferred to act now in order to buy insurance against further downturns,” Bandholz added.

But he and others said that the impact was not likely to be significant, given external risks to the economy from Europe and China and the political stalemate over fiscal policy.

“Today’s monetary policy decision is unlikely to have any perceptible impact on the labor market and the US economy in general,” he said, as long as businesses are worried about the fiscal stalemate.

“Bernanke is marching US monetary policy even further into totally uncharted territory,” said John Ryding and Conrad DeQuadros and RDQ Economics.

“Our view is that these actions will do little to stimulate growth but will raise inflation expectations,” they said.

(c) AFP 2012

Read: Bond auction sees Ireland’s cost of borrowing fall dramatically

Read next:

Comments (22 Comments)

  • B Lowe 13/09/12 #

    The Federal Reserve. A private bank. No gold reserves. It’s term of tenure is up end of 2012. So its basically printing money out of things air and getting every taxpayer to pay it back. Absolutely mad. This debt can never be paid and the US sinks further into the sand.

    Reply
    • Xadovan 13/09/12 #

      Under the extended baseline scenario, which generally adheres closely to current law, federal debt would gradually decline over the next 25 years—to 53 percent of GDP in 2037—because revenues would reach levels that are high by historical standards, and spending for programs other than the major health care programs and Social Security would reach the lowest level relative to GDP since before World War II.”

      http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/images/pubs-images/43xxx/43289-land-LTBOinfographic_1.png

      Reply
    • My graphs a lot bigger than yours Xadovan.
      http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/faq.html

      Reply
    • Xadovan 13/09/12 #

      Nice four year old map Sean, what is the point you are trying to make? US debt crisis is a load of nonsense, they have been in debt since WWI and they have lots of ways to raise revenue and cut spending.

      Reply
    • ” The world is just saddled with too much debt. Throughout history, total debt-to-GDP only ever breached 200% when nations were spending on war. Today we’re at 310%.
      There’is no savior large enough with a magical pool of capital to stave off this unfortunate conclusion to the global debt super cycle. We think hard defaults are imminent.”
      Kyle Bass

      Governments frequently borrow for different reasons. The problem is many nations (including ourselves and US) sovereign and total debt has reached levels that are unserviceable and default of some description is unavoidable.
      Politicans are playing the ticking timebomb game. Desperately attempting to get their administration to voting day before the economy implodes. Willing to print any amount of currency to achieve this.
      Of course Bernanke’s tenure, also, finishes this year.

      Reply
    • Xadovan 14/09/12 #

      “We think hard defaults are imminent.”

      Kyle Bass hopes defaults are coming

      “February 08, 2010

      Kyle Bass has bet the house against Japan–his own house, that is. The Dallas hedge fund manager (no relation to the famous Bass family of Fort Worth) is so convinced the Japanese government’s profligate spending will drive the nation to the brink of default that he financed his home with a five-year loan denominated in yen, which he hopes will be cheaper to pay back than dollars. Through his hedge fund, Hayman Advisors, Bass has also bought $6 million worth of securities that will jump in value if interest rates on ten-year Japanese government bonds, currently a minuscule 1.3%, rise to something more like ten-year Treasuries in the U.S. (a recent 3.4%)”

      Reply
    • Xadovan, I’m amazed that you get red thumbs when you are at least trying to explain what’s going on but B Lowe gets lots of green thumbs for spouting nonsense.
      Yes there is a problem with the debt but what’s the solution? B Lowe represents a bad mind set on the journal!

      Reply
    • Kyle Bass is seen by some as a Market guru because he forecast the 2008 crash, put his money where his mouth is and made a lot of money when it happened.
      I listen when he says, that Japan and the Euro are going to crash. Forewarned is forearmed. Although I think he has too much confidence in the dollar.
      Japan’s economic demise wouldn’t be a big surprise. It has been an economic basketcase for the past twenty years.
      Funnily enough, the Irish government have been taking their direction from the same economic textbook.

      Reply
    • Xadovan 14/09/12 #

      People have been betting against Japan for a long time and they are still kicking. Even the Euro will probably end up surviving at this point.

      Reply
  • Bernanke was told about the impending global crisis back in 2008 and did absolutely nothing. He in fact got rewarded for a world recession with a reappointment. Disgraceful.

    Reply
  • Just in time for the US presidential election…..

    Reply
  • The levels of printing new dollars is so far off the scale that eventually , probably with very little notice that currency could run into serious trouble and cause a global credit problem far far worse than the most recent problem .

    Reply
    • I suspect that point may be closer than many people realise.

      “QE, or ‘quantitative easing’, is, of course, the creation of massive new quantities of monetary units and their targeted injection into financial markets for the purpose of manipulating asset prices and interest rates, and of flooding the banks with extra free reserves. QE is a dangerous drug. It is a hallucinogen. It can make you feel better for a while but it won’t cure the disease. In fact, it makes you sick. The global economy suffers from grave distortions that are the result of years and decades of artificially cheapened credit: Overstretched banks, too much debt, inflated asset prices, misallocated capital. Cheapening credit further – and manipulating asset prices further – is, however, the MO of QE. QE encourages additional borrowing and further balance sheet expansion.

      QE – and zero interest rates – is the policy equivalent of crack cocaine. It makes addictive. There is no end to it.”

      Detlev Schlickter

      Reply
  • Got Gold?

    Reply
    • B Lowe 13/09/12 #

      Funny you mention gold. Gaddafi had lots of gold. That’s why the West turned on him. He almost brought in his Gold dinar system which Sarkozy called the greatest threat to the financial security of mankind. I’d call it traditional old living within your means. I suppose the West has his gold now along with tens of billions in frozen accounts/assets.

      Reply
    • Xadovan 13/09/12 #

      “almost” being not anywhere close

      Reply
    • @b lowe shhhh……..we cant have people knowing the truth.good to see your well informed.

      Reply
    • B Lowe, you must miss ghadaffi dearly? How about you buy yourself a one way ticket north Korea? There’s a dictatorship there for you to love.

      Reply
    • B Lowe you must miss ghadaffi dearly? You can always buy yourself a one way ticket to north Korea. There is a dictator there for you to love. Btw nonsense what you said yesterday about ghadaffi giving his people the best benefits in the world. Are you saying that the people of Libya had a higher standard of living then the Scandinavians for example?

      Reply
    • B Lowe 14/09/12 #

      Declan, of course Libya was better under Gaddafi. Look at Libya now. A failed system. No law, no security across country. Daily battles between militias. Rampant racism. Warlords have taken hold.
      And by the way, what kind of an ignorant comment is that to make re having higher standard of living than Scandinavians? Libya was the world’s poorest country up until 60 years ago. Libyans had zero interest loans, free electricity, extremely cheap petrol and houses were seen as a fundamental human right by Gaddafi and couples git $50,000 to purchase their own one.
      So Declan, your either a fool who thinks democracy is the answer to everything or your an imperialist plant.
      I never say something personally against someone unless they have done it to me a few times.

      Reply
    • B Lowe, you call me a fool and say I’m deluded! But obviously have delusions over the supposed benevolence of ghadaffi. He looked after his own family and those people from his own tribe.

      Reply
  • http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2012/08/qe-the-ultimate-subsidy-for-the-rich/
    “Quantitative Eeasing is a transfer of wealth to the rich. It brings up the housing prices. The state is subsidising the rich, it is the top 1 per cent that benefit from quantitative easing, not the 99 per cent. Quantitative easing really is flooding banks with money so they pay themselves bonuses with it. Banks have money and assets so now they can borrow easily. The poor guy here who is unemployed and can’t borrow is not going to benefit from QE.”

    Reply

Add New Comment