Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

Under-fire RBS chief Stephen Hester waives £1m bonus

Stephen Hester, whose bank is 82 per cent owned by the British taxpayer, gives up his bonus to avoid becoming a ‘pariah’.

Image: PA

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE of the Royal Bank of Scotland has volunteered to waive his bonus – of nearly £1 million – after intense public and politicla pressure.

Stephen Hester had been due a bonus of £963,000, ratified by his board of directors last Thursday when they voted to issue him 3.6 million new shares in the bank.

News of the bonus had prompted major public ire in the UK, where the government took an 82 per cent stake in the bank during the financial collapse.

The bonus had been ratified by the Treasury, however, who had reportedly feared the chief executive – and the rest of the board – could quit if they were treated differently to directors at non-state-owned banks.

Chancellor George Osborne said the decision was a “sensible and welcome” one, while Labour leader Ed Miliband said Hester had “done the right thing” by declining the bonus.

Labour had earlier threatened to make the bonus become a major political issue by forcing a vote in the House of Commons on the issue, which if passed would have forced Osborne to veto the payment.

The BBC‘s business editor Robert Peston reported that it seemed likely that backbench disquiet in the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition would mean Labour had enough support to pass the bill.

The Daily Telegraph said Hester’s decision raised more questions about his future at the bank – given that he was appointed by a Labour chancellor, Alastair Darling, after the British taxpayer’s bailout in 2008.

Some analysts have suggested the public pressure on Hester may set a dangerous precedent, given how most sides agree it is better for state-owned banks to be managed on an ‘arm’s length’ basis.

Yesterday’s Sunday Times said further bonuses being lined up for later in the year could still mean he is due up to £8m in new shares – a prospect which could revive the pressure on him.

Hester’s bonus came on top of his basic salary of £1.2 million.

RBS was this morning worth around £25.8 billion – meaning the British taxpayer’s investment was worth only around half of what it was when the bank was saved.

Read: Public outcry over banker’s €1 million bonus

More: British bankers may sue over bonuses – if they’re ‘too small’

Read next:

Comments (10 Comments)

  • He’s still getting paid at least 36 million for 4 years work. The 1 million bonus is a side issue to distract from the real issue.

    Reply
  • Why can these people not see that there will always be a public backlash at a £1 million bonus in times of severe austerity?

    Its quite simple really, they have no concept of an ordinary working life. It is a life of high privilege and ignorance of the real world. If they were in any way PR savvy they would have said right at the start either that this was going to be paid if performance cluases were met OR that there would be no bonuses at all until the bank concerned started operating at reasonable elevels again.

    Problem averted and expectations managed.

    Instead we get the usual kneejerk reaction from the public once it has been leaked to the press.

    Reply
  • Danny D 30/01/12 #

    If the bank doubled in value since his appointment, I honestly believe he deserves his bonus.

    Reply
  • Hester you spit in the face of the ordinary tax payer who saved your bank how dare you be so arrogant to take such a payment and when such pressure is applied you retract and repent !

    Reply
  • Give him a gold medal.,and put the bonus to good use,he does not need it

    Reply
  • Ok so he doubled his bank.Truth is,he does not need a bonus,as he has enough money.Cant they give him a gold medal instead,and silver to those not as good.

    Reply
  • There should be no bonus paid to anyone during a recession.Then again,these people dont live in the real world.

    Reply
    • That is a sweeping generalisation, why should someone who has doubled the value of the organisation he works for not be entitled to a bonus? I would imagine that if you did the same for any business you worked for, you would be fairly unhappy if a bonus wasn’t forthcoming.

      Reply

Add New Comment