Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
‘Loss of momentum’: Target of 41,000 homes built this year looks set to be missed by 6,000
Israeli strikes continue overnight in Gaza, killing 13 people
'Bodies and limbs on the ground' after Israeli strikes kill more than 400 people in Gaza
Nissan's chief engineer Hidetoshi Kadota demonstrates how a Nissan Leaf electric car is recharged. The manufacturer has accused Top Gear of deliberately trying to make its car run out of power. Koji Sasahara/AP
Top Gear
Top Gear 'deliberately flattened electric car battery' before test
Nissan use an electronic tracker to reveal how BBC producers flattened a car battery so that it would run out of charge.
THE PRODUCER OF BBC’s hugely popular motoring show Top Gear have been accused of deliberately running down the battery on a electronic car – just so it would run out of charge during filming for the show.
The final episode of the show’s 17th series, broadcast eight days ago, included a feature on the Nissan Leaf which was being used to bring presenter Jeremy Clarkson on a 60-mile journey.
The car unexpectedly ran out of electricity midway through the trip, however, forcing fellow presenter James May to push it manually in a bid to revive its battery. As the Guardian recounts, the presenters concluded that electric cars were “not the future”.
But The Times reports (behind a paywall) that Nissan had fitted the Top Gear car with a telematics device which sent it constant updates on its location and usage – and which suggests that the show’s producers deliberately flattened the battery before setting off.
Clarkson had apparently set off for his 60-mile journey with the batter only 40 per cent charged, fully knowing that the battery did not have enough charge to reach his destination in Lincolnshire, Nissan has claimed.
Advertisement
Not only that, but the producers seemed to have deliberately diverted Clarkson to the town of Lincoln, which has no electric car charging points – meaning the car would have effectively been stranded there.
Nissan also claims that the car’s electronic dashboard would have notified any driver about its potential mileage – meaning that even if the battery hadn’t been deliberately run down, Clarkson would have been notified about its 30-mile charge as soon as he turned the ignition.
It further claims that the car’s “eco mode”, which would extend its mileage by limiting its acceleration, was not used.
Producer Andy Wilman has defended the broadcast by saying the point of the feature was “to show how bad the charging infrastructure is in the UK. The car needed to run out of charge so that could be demonstrated.”
He spokesman added that the purpose of the feature was not to test the car’s mileage claims, and that its feature was therefore no different to a scene involving a traditional car, which could have been refuelled without a problem.
The Independent adds that Top Gear is currently being sued by electric car maker Tesla, after a 2008 feature showed a Roadster car running out of electricity and breaking down during a drag race against a ‘traditional’ supercar.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Am very disappointed with Top Gear on this. You wouldn’t find them doing something like this with one of the high performance Ferraris to ‘prove’ a point. I am a big fan of the show and I realise the show is to entertain, but I had always assumed the ‘tests’ would be genuine attempts to portray the reality, and not scripted pieces with false or at best misleading information.
So how do we know that any information and statistics they give us about any car, has any basis in fact, or is merely the creation of a script writer as it makes better telly??
It’s all scripted…you don’t honestly believe that on all those long distance ‘races’ across Europe that they hadn’t it timed or edited in advance to be sure the car always(or pretty much always) won? It’s entertainment now, with factual statistics seemingly taking a back seat (no pun intended…)
I am a big fan of Top Gear, I never miss an episode. I know it’s scripted mostly, but I had assumed that things like ‘road tests’ would be sort of based on actual facts, you know, like a test :) I mean they had no need to do this to prove their point(s) and by doing it, they actually take away creditability from their points I think.
This story is getting so old – how long before Nissan stop crying over the reality that as it stands, electric cars are not the way forward. Top Gear pointed out very effectively that we are not ready for electric cars, the infrastructure is not there. I for one do not have 13 hours to wait while my battery charges up, that’s IF I can find a charge point. Did anyone really think Top Gear were trying to prove how awful the range is on electric cars??? Until we get the infrastructure in place, the electric car will remain a city dweller.
Care to suggest the ‘way forward’? Because if you think petrol and diesel are the only way forward then we’re not going to have any cars at all in a couple of decades.
Neil I didnt say electric cars were not the way forward, in fact there is a company making great inroads in getting around the problem of infrastructure and long charge times (check out http://www.betterplace.com/, not affiliated in anyway). Petrol and Diesel are not the way forward, but too many people are jumping on the electric bandwagon without thinking it through. I agree with JimBob – Hydrogen has great potential but we are years away from solving the issue of how to produce it cheaply. Just like with electric cars there is no short term solution, we need to be very clear on what we do and realise that the research we do into alternative energy now will not benefit us hugely in 2-3 years time, but provided we choose the correct path, we will see dividends on 20-30 years time. No sooner Im afraid – unless someone discovers something revolutionary in the mean time.
You’re complaining about infrastructure. But it has to start somewhere. The market will decide whether it’s batteries or hydrogen cells. Top Gear pointing out that, guess what, there are far more petrol pumps out there than the alternative takes us nowhere because all they want to do is hold back time (reverse it back to the 50s if they could).
But there’s no point just waiting until the price of petrol is such that car usage drops overnight. Yes, it’s an ‘early adopter’ situation at the moment, with all the expense and risks that that can bring. But thank God there’s people putting money into it now.
@Neil definitely, I agree we need early adoptors and we need to push the boundaries, but we also need to be very careful about what we push…….is pushing for electric cars and charge points in every city the way forward? Or should we push other alternatives, like hot-swappable batteries, or hydrogen. The focus at the moment seems to be too much (at least in the consumer’s eye) on electric cars and charge points – and if the consumer perceives this negatively (which with a lack of charge points and reasonable recharge times) they will, the market could kill electric cars before they become viable. Its a look before you leap situation – have we exposed the public to this technology too early, without creating the necessary infrastructure, and without considering the negative consequences this could have?
I’m afraid that in the meantime Top Gears credibility has been swept down the toilet – how can we believe anything they ever say or state to us as being fact again, or as being credible again, into the future?
Ah Eddie come on, lets be honest I enjoy Top Gear but I don’t rely on it as a credible news source – I don’t really believe anyone should, as it is an entertainment programme in reality – but for people to get so worked over Top Gear misleading the public…….? I dont believe they did – they drove an electric car which ran out of charge, and then tried to charge it up in a typical British town. I actually thought it highlighted their point quite well – and obviously do did Nissan as I believe they have no sponsored a charge point in that town.
Hacking, How so?
Its Nissan’s car that they lend to the show for the “test”, they can do what they want to the car its there’s so they are perfectly entitled to get stats about any tests run on it by Top Gear.
Its clear Top Gear just want to maintain the petrol head culture but reality states that this culture can’t continue into our future.
We need alternatives and the likes of the Nissan Leaf whilst not suitable for all situations is perfectly suitable for a large amount of the population
Top Gear is staged!? Since when!?
We all know that it has been for years. That being said they could have just picked a town further away to drive to. There was no need to make out that the range of the car was less. It was a bad move on the part of the producers, they could have avoided all this if they chose a different town but I suppose they didnt count in Nissian getting the data transmitted back
It’s extremely irresponsible of the show to do what they did.
They knew what they were trying to do- whether it was for pure entertainment or to sabotage any notion of a non fossil fuel society.
In any event, if you watch top gear for the purpose of being informed about motor vehicles, you’re doing it wrong.
showing that electric cars have a limited range and are hard to recharge is irresponsible? That’s a strange sense of logic you have there Liam. Imagine finding yourself in the middle of the countryside with no battery power left and no way to recharge. Its irresponsible NOT to raise this issue.
Top Gear is a comedy, where three male stereotypes get into ever-more absurd situations with expensive vehicles. Occasionally it’s quite funny, if you like that sort of thing. That some people think it’s a serious review-slash-adventure show is amusing, but that any major company that thought that it was the right platform for an honest test of the real-world performance of their new electric car… well that’s downright hilarious.
Gavan The Independent does not say Tesla successful sued Top Gear in 2008. They are currently suing them in an ongoing case which they issued on the 30 of March this year concerning a Top gear episode in 2008. You can find details of the case on numerous sites around the web
Tony – thanks for the correction; I had come across another piece which said Tesla’s case had been successful and got my wires crossed in putting the piece together. It’s been amended now.
TopGear were aware of the data being recorded. That is an irrelevance. Go and read Andy Wilman’s response (from last week) on the TopGear.com website. Regardless of how they reached the conclusion or how fair their methods are, the people at TopGear illustrated a very valid point.
Nissan are just throwing their toys out of the pram because they jumped the gun with launching the Leaf which has been rightly nominated as a posterboy for the shortcomings of electric car ownership. You can’t go to a shopping mall these days without some twit shoving a flyer into your face for the thing. Sorry, I should call them leaflets – you know things made of paper? The all new, all electric, NISSAN LEAF; still a killer of trees.
The point, which many of you appear to have missed and so clearly illustrated by TopGear was this:
What if you or I arrived at our destination – EVEN having responsibly charged the car to it’s full capacity before setting out for the journey. What if having completed our journey we can’t locate a charging point to charge the car sufficiently for the return leg of the journey? What then? What if there are no public recharging points and you can’t park in close enough proximity to your hotel, B&B or whatever to hook up even an extension lead? Sorry, but the infrastructure just isn’t there and THAT was the point. The Nissan Leaf itself is not the problem and Nissan should untwist their knickers and shut the hell up. The majority of the world is simply not ready for the fully electric car yet.
MINI carried out a non-purchase, trial run all over Europe with their electric MINI and guess what – they pulled the plug (pun intended). :P Perhaps Nissan should have taken a leaf (oh dear) out of MINI’s book. Nissan wanted to be the first volume manufacturer to bring a relatively normal car, powered by electricity to market and they did – now they will just have to deal with the flack when they receive criticism of it. Those are the risks when you are the pioneers of new and relatively unproven technology without sufficient infrastructure to back it up 100%. They should just suck it up.
Nissan ought to have known better anyway, TopGear is a program for petrolheads. Clarkson has never been all that enamoured by their regularly powered product – and that includes their powerful sports coupes. The conservative old TopGear crew were never exactly ambassadors for the brand either and that was back when TopGear conducted very straightforward, stiff upper lipped, roadtests of everyday cars. I happen to recall that the Nissan Sunny was one of their favourite cars to ridicule and that the Almera at launch in 1995 also left them feeling utterly indifferent. Nissan ought to realise that TopGear is no longer a consumer product review show that reviews cars, it’s a prime time entertainment show that just happens to involve cars.
I know there will be a few ‘Dislike’ button maniacs who feel compelled to vote my comment down. It’s blatantly obvious that there are an awful lot of people posting here who haven’t a clue about cars or the engineering and technologies involved contributing to this piece.
I’d be very interested to know how many of the electric car crazies – who are vomiting their support of Nissan and outrage at TopGear all over this page – have actually put their money where their mouth is and shelled out their hard earned for one.
Your on the ball. I though it was a fair example of everyday use of the car, people will not charge the car evernight, no one will want to wait around for 30mins for a fast charge. I read in another thread here that ESB are putting fast charge points on the motorway – two cars ahead of you waiting and your delayed 1 .5 hrs….
Unless there are charging points in every town I think we are way off with electric cars.
Currently they say oh if you live in a City then they will be perfect, what if you want to take a trip must you then have another car for you longer trips outside the city.
I’ll be buying a plug-in Prius when they come out. Seems to solve the range problem. I have a Prius at the moment and it’s worth its weight in gold for troll value – from petrolheads and hippies alike. The only downside is that I was plagued by Green party canvassers at the last election.
Bang on Paul, could not have said it better myself. If there is one thing here that every non ‘electric car crazy’ agrees on its that the infrastructure is just not there – electric cars could possibly be the way forward but it will be years before all the teething problems are sorted out.
Correct me if i’m wrong……, but at the end of this particular episode didn’t Clarkson, Hammond and May all agree though that alternative fuel was the way forward as petrol/oil was eventually going to run out? May made the point that Hydrogen would likely be the best when the processing was safer and cheaper…
And James May test drove the clarity in the States and RAVED about it. In a James May way, not a Clarkson way. Top Gear are NOT in the pay of the Saudis and trying to force us all into petrol Range Rovers until the bitter end! What they are quietly (ish) pushing is the simple fact that current electric cars are NOT THE ANSWER. The are fine for city dwellers who only ever toodle around town. For the rest of us, they’re a crock of shite. Quite apart from their eco credentials being shaky (depending on how the electricity of a given country is produced, they’re a damaging to the environment as, say, a Fiat Twin Air, for sure), and the as yet unaddressed issue of how to safely dispose of their mucking great batteries once they’re used up, there’s also the issue that they just can’t cover a decent distance. Of course, until Hydrogen production becomes more cost efficient, they remain a viable option for a subset of the market – but they ain’t gonna save the world!
> JimBob Hillbill (if that’s you’re real name). Nope. But I never said this car would suit me, merely that it was perfectly good for the vast majority of real car journeys. (I wouldn’t describe people who need to do a 50 mile round commute as ‘living in a city’ either.)
A 50 mile round commute really isn’t a lot to be honest, Newbridge or Blessington to Dublin city centre for example.Its just not practical for the majority of commuters to own an electric car with this type of range.
Top Gear simply made the point that an electric car will not be a viable option for many people until charging points are commonplace.
Yes they made it entertaining (they’d be out of a job if they didn’t) and had to be deliberately stupid to run the car flat in a city with no charging points.
In fairness to Clarkson he did say the Nissan was very good in many respects and was far better value than the Peugeot..
If anybody should be miffed it should be peugeot.
The reality is the tired format of Top Gear is well known,they don’t like Electric Cars,this is known and they exploit those cars weaknesses. To be fair to them,they made several v good points against the electric cars,can’t be topped up(ie,in a petrol car u can put a â
Does anyone else find it amusing that no one is talking about the more successful of the two cars at all? You’d wonder why? Then again, it was of such little interest to me that I cannot even recall if it was the Mitsubishi, Peugeot or Citroën version they had on test.
In general, for car owners, a car battery is used for 1-2 years if it is well maintenance. However, many people have to replace it just for 3-4 months. This is a trouble for those car owners. In fact, you need to check and maintain the car battery on a regular basis, and then it will let its service lifespan longer. Of course, if you charge it improperly, it will damage the capacity and voltage. More information from Leoch International http://www.leoch.com
‘Loss of momentum’: Target of 41,000 homes built this year looks set to be missed by 6,000
Diarmuid Pepper
7 hrs ago
4.0k
35
Gaza
Israeli strikes continue overnight in Gaza, killing 13 people
30 mins ago
245
Ceasefire violation
'Bodies and limbs on the ground' after Israeli strikes kill more than 400 people in Gaza
Updated
11 hrs ago
41.0k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 157 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 109 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 141 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 111 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 132 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 60 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 38 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 90 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 97 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 86 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 68 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say