Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

This Friday could be one of the biggest days in European history – here’s why

EU leaders are due to meet in Brussels for a summit that could be make-or-break for the euro.

Image: AP Photo/Michael Probst

FOR ANYONE TAKING an interest in the ongoing European financial crisis,  the biggest date on your mind is probably 9 December.

That’s when EU leaders meet for their next big summit in Brussels. Investors and journalists appear convinced that this meeting will be a make-it-or-break-it moment for the euro area, and for three good reasons:

  • Rising German bond yields
  • The fragility of France’s credit rating
  • The impending disbursement of the next tranche of Greek aid

If EU leaders are going to embrace radical action now is the time to do it.

The eurozone crisis is clearly infecting the core, with Germany, France, and Belgium feeling the heat of rising bond yields. That was probably some of the biggest news to come out lately; it suggests that the crisis is putting even German credit at risk.

We’re continuing to see positive German economic data—like the drop in unemployment to 5.5 per cent in October. But even the slight effect the crisis has had on rising sovereign yields (not to mention common sense) suggests that if euro area economy continues to deteriorate it’s really just a matter of time until data beats become misses.

Next, speculation that France’s sovereign credit rating is up in the air has turned into a real threat. In the last week, all three of the major ratings agencies have reiterated warnings that the country’s AAA is on shaky ground and, again, it’s only a matter of time before this fear materialises. If they lose the triple A, then the euro area may no longer be able to bail itself out.

The next €8.2 billion in troika aid waits for a vote in the Greek Parliament on the country’s 2012 budget.  It’s likely that disbursement wouldn’t take place until after the summit, so this is essentially EU leaders’ last chance to throw Greece to the dogs. If their fiscal compact entails kicking a country or two out of the currency (Greece and Portugal would probably top that list), this is their last chance not to waste taxpayer money on another round of aid for Greece.

Even so, expectations that EU leaders will live up to the kind of endgame that investors are talking about is probably overblown. German Chancellor Angela Merkel spat on those hopes on Friday when she likened the crisis to a marathon, saying that will come after “years of difficulties,” not a “single effective blow.” Germany has time and again opposed ECB intervention or eurobonds without substantial change—the kind of change that would only come with revisions to its constitution, and at the end of the day any decision in the EU will require Germany to be on board.

More than anything, markets are looking for a long-term commitment to fixing the crisis and tackling the problems at its core. Instead of a quick fix, we’ll probably see a long-term outline of the measures leaders are going to pass and the criteria for an expansion of the ECB’s powers in the medium term. Markets will gauge their reaction upon how credible this plan is, and how far it goes towards truly resolving the problems of the EU currency union.

Published with permission from:

Business Insider
Business Insider is a business site with strong financial, media and tech focus.

Read next:

Comments (35 Comments)

  • I was all for European integration – free trade, closer political cooperation, cultural exchange etc. but fiscal union in the form of a common currency was a step to far.
    I’m thinking here of a situation where people of various backgrounds share living accommodation. Each separably pays rent and buys their own food. The necessary day to day running costs are shared equally and overseen by someone agreeable to all.
    Lets just imagine the situation changes, a new regime is introduced. a committee of sorts is formed and a commune type arrangement is adopted. Now the food is bought in bulk, rent is paid into a fund and day to day running costs are managed by the committee. This all works well for a while, everyone is working, has an income and fund management is a doddle. Then someone looses their job, someone else gets a rise in income or someone else gets in trouble with personal finance. The committee decides to readjust make allowances, borrow to carry on and a complicated financial structure is introduced. The strong help the weak, the lucky allow for the unlucky until the weak become dependent and the strong become resentful. Personal responsibility becomes unnecessary to some in the view of others, and remarks like ‘who ate all the cornflakes’ or ‘who’s used up the last of the butter’ become the norm.
    I know it’s a simple analogy but it’s human nature. There has to be a fine line between integration and interdependence.
    On a continent soaked with the blood of millions over centuries of war the political and cultural integration of countries had a valid ambition, but the introduction of fiscal union done nothing more than sow the seeds of discontent.
    The Eurozones troubles are much of it’s own making and to my mind are more of a nature of cultural incompatibility than any real deep economic malaise. Here is an extract from an article by Dan O’Brien in yesterdays Irish Times:

    ” The underlying fundamentals of the euro zone as a single economy are solid, and the bloc’s aggregate budgetary position is better than those of Britain, the US and Japan, all of which are able to borrow at low interest rates. If confidence is restored in the euro and in the policymakers at its helm, the situation could calm quickly. Reforms could be introduced and economies might grow more rapidly. That is about the best-case scenario. But there is not much time left. Next Friday’s summit may well be the last chance.”

    Reply
    • I believe it is in Germany’s and France’s interest that we would have fiscal union because then they ca call the shots and control us all because we always do what we are told for a few bob!

      Reply
    • Thank you for your reply Sheelagh.
      You know I’m not so sure about this ‘Merkozy’ Franco German plot to manipulate themselves into a position of dominance in the EU.

      I think that the initial integration of the EEC and perhaps the even more integrated EU was good for Europe, and us by extension, the aftershock of WW2 was still very fresh in the minds of older EU members and the policy behind the initial concept has kept Europe politically stable for the last 50 years or so.

      However, fiscal union has been a disaster and the result has confirmed the reservations expressed by some older EU members at the time. It’s a ‘too many eggs in one basket’ problem now and the solution is outside political/democratic control. The markets rule Europe and all the political leaders can do is make token gestures to the will of the people while being driven by these market forces.

      I believe that if the disaster of European fiscal union results in distrust between European nations and the marvellous achievements of the Common Market and the EEC are lost because of the greed of financial markets it will be a tragedy that could ruin the future for generations. Never forget that money is easy found for war seldom as easy for peace. The use of bonds in financial trading was originally initiated to fund wars and that system works best in the environment of large scale manufacturing and large scale slaughter.

      Reply
  • pagan 04/12/11 #

    If Enda and co come back and say there is going to be treaty change with out a vote by the irish people its time people took to the streets.There is no agreement for Germany or France to tell orther member EU states how to run there countrys.Im not anti EU but enough is enough when your country is being told what to do by the big wigs of europe.

    Reply
    • Pagan, we didn’t vote in previous referendums out of the goodness of the various government’s hearts. They don’t have any say in the matter. If a Treaty is up for amendment the Irish people will vote on the matter.

      Reply
    • AMurphy 04/12/11 #

      If it goes to a treaty change we’re fecked! Fine Gael have no where near enough people power/ popularity to get a referendum (no doubt an extremely complex one!) passed…it’s as simple as that…buy up that sterling lads and lassies!

      Reply
  • I was all for saving the Euro until the last couple of weeks. Ireland’s needs to put her own interests first for once. Germany has been prospering for too long off other Eurozone countries. They’ll do anything to save the Euro, you know why… because they stand to benefit the most. After all, the Punt in the long term may prove to be a better option for us the Irish people.

    Reply
  • This has *grossly* annoyed me.

    I thought he was elected to serve the Irish people, not the Germans!

    Reply
  • pagan 04/12/11 #

    Enda get the printing press ready.The punt is coming back.

    Reply
  • I don’t think that this government see Ireland’s needs and well being as a priority. I think they are marching to a German Drum.

    Germany started, fought and lost 2 World Wars seeking European dominance. If we are not careful they will achieve it without firing a shot.

    Reply
  • RIP Euro – 09/12/11

    Reply
  • I think that in the wider Scheme of things Ireland has not much influnce in Europe. We all know that it is dominated by the bigger countries EG. Germany and France, There are so many countries in the European union with different Cultures that is the Problem whey they try tio sort out Treaty changes. I wonder what really goes on at meetings .Does the Taoiseach keep quiote and lert things go as they are. Also I think that smaller countries are swallowed up by the bigger ones when it comes to making decisions.

    Reply
    • pagan 04/12/11 #

      Maybe its time the smaller countrys of the EU join together and try and block vote the likes of france and germany when it comes to treaty change ect.Its the only way countrys like ireland will be heard.
      The british were laughed at when they didnt join the euro.Look whos laughing now.All its going to take is for France to loose its AAA+ rateing and its free fall for the euro.No goverment in the EU has any back up plan if this happens..Enda will sit at the table and be told to do x y and z to suit germany and france.

      Reply
  • I’m sick of all this clap trap about “Ze Germans”. Irish people are overly influenced by our British neighbours in terms of our attitudes to Europe (Colonial hangover). The Germans have just been thru 2 decades of austerity and have come out if it with a strong economy. Maybe they will do the same for us. I know the medicine tastes bad but it should make us better. Only time will tell…

    Reply
    • The Marshall Plan put Germany back on its feet. We are now paying for German reunification.We have almost paid back the money we got from the EU and it is a despicable act to force the Irish people to bail out German and French currency and bond gamblers.

      Reply
    • LesEnfant I think you and others are being overly sensitive about the reaction of Irish people to the German government. I don’t see why their government can’t be criticised just because of WWII. Don’t forget that an underlying reason why Germans were so willing to believe Hitler’s propaganda was as they were suffering so much draconian austerity themselves. Nobody is saying that all the Germans are nazis! Just that their government, along with France(!) are looking out for their own interests and that the Irish government should be looking out for ours!

      Reply
    • at long last someone speaking sense…Germany was nearly bankrupted when reunified…rectifying years of socialst incompetance…trabants?

      Reply
  • The Budget that will be presented this week will be overtaken by what happens at Summit of European leaders next Friday.

    Reply
  • Bruce 04/12/11 #

    Forget the tabloid reactions for a moment. Ireland has few options. 1. Stay in the euro. This gives greater certainty to multi national companies and therefore means we continue export led recovery. 2. Leave euro and peg to what rate? Sterling – likely to appreciate in value in medium term therefore not wise. Or go solo punt – we would have to peg to usd then. My opinion stay in euro with germany. We may not like them but we need them.

    Reply
    • The multi-national companies will go where ever it suits them.We do not need Europe anymore unless it is on our terms.

      Reply
    • Bruce 04/12/11 #

      Uncle mort… You just reinforced my point. All the more reason we have a trading currency that works for multinational corps. Like them or loathe them they provide significant employment, above average salaries and huge spin off industries. Sometimes we have to park our opinions and think pragmatically.

      Reply
    • Multinationals don’t care about Euro. They do banking outside Ireland and the only difference the Euro made in the last decade is that the price of labour and rents has rocketed through the roof. Devalued Punt would be a welcome boost to multinationals and other than them changing the SAP to Punt and paying less for labour, energy and rent I can’t see any other difference.

      Reply
    • @ Bruce – you mentioned 3 options there. What about the 4th option? Leave the eurozone but continue to use the euro as our currency. Doing this would save printing and design costs. It would leave us free of ECB control and control from the French and German governments. We could set our own interest rates particular to the needs of the Irish economy.

      Reply
    • You can’t set your own interest rate if you don’t ‘own’ the currency. That’s basic.

      Reply
    • Actually Dom you can. Montenegro and Kosovo (both users of the euro but outside the eurozone) set their own interest rates. Ecuador, Palau, El Salvador, Marshall Islands, etc. (all users of the US dollar but outside the scope and remit of the US Federal Reserve) set their own interest rates. On the other hand, Monaco, San Marino and Vatican are users of the euro but outside the eurozone. Unlike Montenegro and Kosovo however, they do not set their own interest rates. The euro has been officially adopted by way of ERM (17 countries  – eurozone), via Special Adoption Agreements (3 – Monaco, San Marino and Vatican), and via special treaty (1 – Akrotiri and Dhekelia), and each of these categories of country are governed by ECB rules concerning interest rates. However, those countries that have adopted the euro unofficially (Andorra, Montenegro, and Kosovo) retain the right to set their own interest rates (even if Andorra does not exercise this right, probably as it is in negotiations with the EU to establish a Special Adoption Agreement). Those countries with agreements to use the euro that are outside the eurozone also have the right to issue euro coins with their own national emblems or designs on the national side of the coin: examples include Vatican, Monaco and San Marino.

      Reply
    • As long as we don’t have to sell our soul to them, stay in the Euro but otherwise we’d be better off out

      Reply
    • Brian, the CB of Montenegro ‘sets’ the interest rate according to the ECB rate plus an increment that is actually written in the law. So on surface they are setting their own interest rate but in fact the CB just rubber stamps the ECB movements. There are other drawbacks of this arrangement like for example (in)ability to issue primary emissions of T-bills etc. Similar arrangement is in place in Kosovo. I really can’t see the benefit of keeping the Euro while leaving the EZ.

      Reply
  • Long-Term we need to transition to our own currency, however a sudden Euro collapse with our debt ridden fragile economy would be a disaster!

    Prepare to see an instant drop in living standards overnight.

    Runs on banks, wipe out of savings, a drop in the value of all your cash, and the now clichéd empty ATMs.

    Sure, our exports would be stronger but if there’s a worldwide depression, who’s going to buy our goods?

    The rise in costs of imports would see rapid inflation.

    The public deficit would become larger, leading to deeper cuts in vital services, welfare rates and public salaries.

    Poverty would surge, many businesses would go bust.

    But at least we get to give two fingers to the Germans, right :D

    It could be even worse than that though. For the nationalists out there, be warned that if Punt Nua fails, we may have to peg its value to the Sterling, meaning that tills throughout the country would accept the Queen’s currency as legal tender in the republic.

    And then we get to give two fingers to the Brits, right :D

    Reply
    • David, I think you need to check what “pegging” means. A punt nua could hypothetically be pegged to the sterling at a rate of IR£1 = GB£1. It could be pegged at IR£1 = GB£0.50. It could be pegged at IR£1 = GB£2, and so on and so on. Then there’s always the possibility of introducing a currency basket. In other words, peg the value of the Irish punt in between 2 or more other currencies.

      Reply
  • The Taoiseaches Statement tonight has not really solved anything. In fact he did not tell us anything we already know.We are as wise now as we were before he went on television.We are all aware of the Fiscal situation in Ireland and Europe as a whole. It is now up to European leaders next Friday to do the good thing and allow the ECB to help out. All other options have failed. There is really no plan B. So we are at the mercy of the markets now and their reaction to the summit next Friday.

    Reply
  • The only way that the euro can be saved is that if the ECB is allowed to step in and help . Why is there opposition to it from Germany. THE PRESSURE IS ON. I AM SUE THEY WILL TAKE ACTION AT MEETING ON THURSDAY AND FRIDAY.

    Reply
  • Many of us are looking in the wrong direction, The initiative by world banks last week is being financed by the US federal reserve, what is more the FEd is lending at .6% or 1.5% lower than it lends to its US Banks, on the rump of this the US$ lost 2.5% of its value, the Dollar is in as much if not more trouble than the euro, and what is happening ?? the Chinese are watching and waiting, they have a war chest of 114Trillion Dollars to spend, nice to see Athlone getting some of it, Ironic that 114 trillion dollars is the amount of dept that the US is trying to service, the bulk of it to China. All major corporations (Apple, Dell, WalMart, Chrysler, John Deere, Ford, Caterpillar,to name but a few are now more than willing to accept payment in Chinese Yuan, wouldnt have happened a few short years ago.

    Reply

Add New Comment