Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
WHEN EUROPEAN Central Bank head Mario Draghi said that he was ready to “do whatever it takes” to save the euro, he fuelled investor hopes the bank would again start buying government bonds to lower borrowing costs for struggling countries.
Just one problem: the ECB has tried bond-buying before. And it didn’t work very well — the action was seen as too hesitant and fell short of decisively lowering borrowing costs for stricken Spain and Italy.
Draghi is certain to face questions today at his news conference after the bank’s government council meets about possible bond purchases and the financial turmoil in Europe.
Last week, Draghi noted that excessive government bond interest rates “come within our mandate” if they are hindering the ECB’s efforts to spread its single interest rate policy throughout the 17 countries that use the euro. That was seized on as a hint the bank might restart its Securities Market Programme that bought bonds in the open market, but which has been left dormant since March.
Bond purchases drive their prices up and their interest rates, or yields, down. The ECB’s earlier purchases temporarily drove down the yields on government bonds of Spain and Italy, making it less expensive for these countries to finance their deficits.
Expectations
Analysts say that Draghi has raised expectations for action so high that markets could be sorely disappointed if no new bold measures are announced today. An interest rate cut from the current record low of 0.75 per cent remains a possibility, though many analysts think the bank will wait at least until September. Market attention is most intensely focused on what Draghi will say about the bank’s willingness to influence the market for government bonds.
Slavena Nazarova, an economist at Credit Agricole expects Draghi to emphasise the bank’s willingness to use all its weapons to support the eurozone — but take no new actions: “We are skeptical that such intervention will come as soon as this week, so there is quite a big risk of disappointment for the markets.”
The Federal Reserve said Wednesday that the US economy is losing strength and repeated a pledge to take further steps to boost growth if hiring remains weak. The Fed took no new action after a two-day policy meeting. But it acknowledged in a statement released after the meeting that economic activity had slowed over the first half of the year, with job creation remaining sluggish and consumer spending tapering off somewhat.
For the ECB, simply re-starting the SMP remains problematic. The bank first used the programme in May, 2010 as Greece headed for a bailout, then paused it. It was re-started in August, 2011 as the crisis spread from small countries such as Greece, Ireland and Portugal to countries whose governments are too big to easily bail out — such as Spain and Italy.
Advertisement
But after an initial dip in yields, Spain and Italy soon saw them rise again. The problem was that ECB said the programme had to be limited — a statement that kept it from overly impressing the bond market.
On top of this, there was opposition from the Bundesbank, Germany’s central bank and a high-profile member of the ECB’s board. The Bundesbank remains skeptical of bond purchases, saying they come too close to breaking the ECB’s founding treaty, which forbids it from financing governments.
Because of the treaty restrictions, the ECB must claim the bond purchases are meant to ensure its ultra-low interest rates are being passed on to all borrowers throughout the eurozone.
It’s a restriction not faced by the US Federal Reserve and the Bank of England, both of which have engaged in large-scale bond purchases to expand the supply of money in their economies and try to boost growth.
Here are some other possibilities the bank might look at, all with drawbacks:
— Team up to buy bonds with the eurozone’s bailout fund, the European Financial Stability Fund — or by its replacement, the European Stability Mechanism. The problem is that the EFSF and ESM have limited funding left after bailing out Greece, Ireland and Portugal
— Offer another round of cheap, three-year loans to banks, as the ECB did in December and February. Some of the €1 trillion taken by banks was used to buy government debt, lowering borrowing costs for several weeks. But banks buying bonds raises the threat that if a country defaults on its bonds, the banking system would be hit. That would hurt credit availability, choking the economy.
— Leave any bond purchases to the EFSF/ESM. The ECB could express willingness to buy the bailout funds’ bonds in the open market. That means the ECB could support the effort indirectly.
— Drop the ECB’s insistence on being paid in full on any of the bonds it owns in case a country defaults. Such ECB “seniority” could make investors afraid they would be behind the bank in the line to get paid back — and lead them to demand higher yields on a country’s bonds. That’s the opposite of what the ECB would be trying to achieve. But if the ECB makes a loss on their bonds, that’s passed back to the governments that finance it.
“A reactivation of the SMP only makes sense if other measures are decided on,” such as dropping the bank’s preferred creditor status, said Christoph Balz, analyst at Commerzbank. He warned that dropping that “seniority” status could create new problems. Any ECB losses would be passed back to national governments as part of the bank’s profit or loss for the year. That means losses on Spain could hit troubled Italy, for instance.
Such a change “is not so easy to do,” Balz said. “This argues for Draghi likely not making any announcement this week of any big programme to buy bonds,” said Balz.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Im just throwing this out there but my vote has absolutely nothing to do with my political allignments nor was my vote in this matter influenced by the agenda of any political party. A vote for the retention of the upper house should not be taken by Fianna Fail as a victory for them.
No mater which side won we would have this type of rubbish , I certainly wasnt thinking of FF when I voted. Im bewildered how well the do in recent polls
I voted No in this referendum as deep down I think the Seanad if we are to keep it needs to be reformed and fit for purpose. We have a chance of doing that if its retained. I certainly didn’t do it because FF said I should or in the same breath vote Yes because FG, SF and the fraggle rock lunatic left said I should. If the people have spoken and a No vote is carried, reform the damn thing once and for all. Make it fit for purpose and not a halfway house for wannabe and failed politicians and cronies…
Hahahaha……. oh dear Jases that made me laugh…
These delusional idiots actually think they were instrumental in this result…
Oh dream on ff…
This was done out of pure distrust of this government .
I’m laying out the facts. Fianna Fáil position against all others was vindicated with over 50% of the electorate agreeing that the Seanad must be kept.
They may not all have been swayed by the debate but it certainly did for a lot of people.
The fight back is well under way, bring on the local elections.
Agreed…FF had no more to do with swaying my decision than the cast of Sesame Street.. If FF take any glory as a result of a no vote, they’re even more deluded than we thought.
it will be a sad day for this country if that shower of liars, and crooks ever worm their way back in to power. bring on the local elections is right, so we can begin to get the current shower of liars, and crooks out. Party politics are inherently undemocratic, and the old school voters in this country who vote for parties and not on the merit of policy, honesty, and capability need to wake up. we have brilliant people in this country who can’t get a look in.
FF would have serviced this country better by disbanding in 08′. Debates in the Dáil usually turn into a farce with the leading side telling their opponents “Its your fault we’re here”! Really productive.
Seanie , you’re probably a well meaning person but let me spell this out.I listened to my own better judgement in voting no and not due to the populist spin that was spouted by a party of pocket lining politicians that is Fianna Fail.Also for the record , the current government are no better.Thank you.
”Just goes to show how out of touch with the county these clowns are.”
– they are in touch with Frankfurt and their bosses – that to them is far more important – we are only fleas on a chessboard .
I voted to reject an ill advised amendment. I did not, never have and probably never will, vote for Fianna Fail.
My No vote was not the result of Enda Kenny skipping a debate or anything to do with anyone’s personality. I voted No because the argument for a Yes vote didn’t hold water. Of course, the fact that the Yes campaign was based on deceit and misdirection was a bit of a giveaway that they in fact had no good argument to make.
Next time put together a proposal for how the government should work in the future. Clearly communicate that vision. Then put together a realistic plan to get us there. Then and only then will it be appropriate to have a referendum to start making fundamental changes.
Like it not FF campaigning for a NO was a vital factor in the NO victory. That’s not to say that the victory is entirely theirs and I am not sure they are claiming it as such. There were a number of other vital factors and contributions that delivered the result. But had they supported the YES, like the populist SF, then the result would have been different and be in no doubt about that.
I agree with it was a vote by the people that their is a need to have a second house government from any of the main parties Fianna Fáil and Fianna Gael cannot be trusted
Richard,
I strongly believe that history will show Prom Night to actually be the moment the country was led to bankruptcy.
Until that night, this Government had opportunity to reverse the previous ones mistakes and to question it’s obligations in relation to a guarantee based on fraudulent statements made by the banks.
@Seanie where have you been living? On the moon if you think FF have not responsible for most of the grief this country is in. FG aren’t much better but FF should be consigned to history.
Hi lads sorry to burst your bubble but fianna fail had nothing to do with it , people dont trust enda -plain and simple . By the way if the motion was to abolish Fianna Fail it would have passed!!!
Nothing to do with Fianna Fail as they would have done the same if they were in power. Never forget its them that got us into the current mess. Fingers crossed for the no result
The evidence suggests that for most people it did. People looked at the debates and considered who they trusted. Micheal Martin spoke from the heart and made the difference.
This is a game changing victory for defending democracy in Ireland and for Fianna Fail.
I saying that people responded to reasoned argument and the leadership provided. Fianna Fail’s base is till around 26-28% and the party worked hard to get that vote out.
People might have wanted a No but it was the FF voter base that took the effort to turn out. Let us not pretend that FF did not drive the result.
As a limerick man I have to say niall Collins is a clown, he desperately wants to be minister for justice when he is clearly more qualified to be the minister for buffoonery.
What an absolute ass. Its obvious the people didn’t take one single iota notice of Fianna Fail, Fine Gael, Labour or Sinn Fein. Even the bloody socialists supported the government on this for the love of god! The Seanad was always going to be a difficult one and I for one was surprised polls suggested it would be a landslide. Asking people to abolish a parliament in favour of possible further reform of an existing one which was given very poor reform in the past two years on the back of major reform promises given during the election? I for one didn’t feel comfortable with that proposal and would prefer the very very slim chance that the Seanad may well one day actually do something useful in its current form and I hoped (but don’t expect) reform of the parliament if we voted No.
Fianna Fail were the party who came out with various reports on reform and the Seanad, including one which gave the costing for the running of the parliament. They switched sides late on purely for political reasons and not for the good of the people. This is a party that has not changed since being booted out of office.
Just like when they came out against the property tax having signed up to it under the Troika MOU… ‘Its the wrong time…’
Bunch of hypocrites… It’s becoming next to impossible to support any political party in the country. A new political party / perspective is needed (I don’t mean a party like Direct Democracy or a form of ‘New Labour’ mind…)
Fianna Fail, do not think for one moment that a no vote here, should it be realised, is an endorsement of your party or your arguments during the campaign. You changed opinion on this topic mid stream, had ample time in power to address reform. Also, political point scoring rhetoric against other parties is nauseating, you scrotes.
My 7 year old couldn’t understand why anybody would want to vote to abolish the shannon. Poor lad genuinely thought that was going to be end of the Shannon river for ever!
People voted no as a vote against the government and Enda Kenny. Some of course there were those fearful of the legal implications of abolishing the Seanad. Some just wanted to see it stay. Whatever peoples reasons, FF had little or nothing to do with peoples decision. The Irish people are waking up, our memories are little longer than these traitors think.
Angela you are fairly deluded if you think FF hadn’t a big hand in the no victory I’d say the most of ye sending in messages are the far left and Sinn Fein lapdogs
It’s the people that regardless of political affiliation that voted No or Yes. We still care that little much about democracy. Fianna Fáil sh*t all over the constitution for years. I didn’t because of any party you you fool.
FF trying to big up M Martin . He’s a throwback to Bertie and Cowen and they must feel at this stage that he’s a liability. Result has sfa to do with so called FF campaign
The audacity of FF to think that they swayed people to vote no. my no vote had nothing to do with their opinions on the abolition of the Seanad. can’t get over the cheek of them.
I voted of my own accord. But it’s nice to see enda getting one in the eye. Wonder will he show his face or will state commisar bryan dobson be allowed to show it
The blind arrogance of the Fianna Fail mindset never cease to amaze & disgust me! I voted No precisely because I dread the thought of their ilk having unfettered power if re-elected to government. The Seanad needs reform but the citizens of this country also need a system of checks & balances in place to maintain an eye on government policy. Mary Robinson was never an elected politican but she came to prominence as a Senator. A reformed Seanad with people of her integrity could make a powerful contribution to this country …
Don’t be so quick to take credit Fianna Fail….a No vote in the Abolition of the Seanad Referendum wasn’t in any way a vote of confidence in the Fianna Fail party.
FF put this country on its knees… They done more damage than good in the past. I hope to good God people remember the shower of idiots they are. They had nothing to do with my No vote full stop
No votes have everything to do with ff, end of story. Why didn’t they reform it when the were in power and by look of their support they’ll be back in power again to make another of the country and the people of this country deserve it.
Forgive my language. I wish those w&nkers would F@@k off. Martin had absolutely no hand in my decision to vote no. Hateful b@stards the lot of them and this is coming from an ardent FF supporter. Never again!
Collins you idiot , just how thick do you think we are . The creeping mistrust of the political system which contributed to the no vote is largely based on our experience of the incompetence of your party . … You and your like make me want to f”@&£&@” scream
Shut up Seanie… FF like new Labour in England did just looked at the polls and backed a winning horse! Now they have succeeded in their heads to separate themselves and their so called policies from FG and create a viable opposition! It’s crap and I don’t buy it!
Fianna fail may not have swayed ever voter but at least they provided opposition, alternatives and debate.
The past failures during the tiger were due to a failure of genuine opposition, debate and contrary opinions. Those who failed to oppose and do their paid duty of opposition unburdened by governing are now ministers. The duty of the opposition is to oppose and challenge for the good ofall and as such are the key regulators in democracy… Let’s see no if our leaders can provide real reform as they promised…..people are judged by their promises…..oh wait….
So Robert now ff are to blame for all the cuts the present government have to make! I know your answer: no. The truth is ff made a shite of the country when they were in power and history will show they’ll do it again and again. And it was nothing to do with the opposition. And what did seanad do, sweet fa
The Government won no matter what the result, If the people had voted YES then they achieved their objective and as it looks the people voted NO, the people can no longer moan about the Seanad. A WIN-WIN for Enda peeps!
I think the FF people will be delighted that they were on the winning side. Their battle is with SF and I think SF backed the wrong horse. They went from a pro-Seanad stance to a view to abolish in the past few years. Similarly, I think SF picked the yes side for the very same motives, they got it wrong.
However, you cannot entirely dismiss the FF contribution to this victory. They still maintain significant grassroots support and membership throughout the country and with a victory of less than 48,000 votes, you can’t completely discount their contribution to the debate and subsequent outcome.
Tánaiste to update Government on the implications of proposed US tariffs as Dáil returns today
9 mins ago
54
1
bridge over troubled motor
Irish Rail plans 'bridge strike cameras' to reduce delays when bridges are hit
19 mins ago
348
2
Ceasefire violation
'Bodies and limbs on the ground' after Israeli strikes kill more than 400 people in Gaza
Updated
10 hrs ago
40.6k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 157 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 109 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 141 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 111 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 132 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 60 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 38 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 90 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 97 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 86 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 68 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say