Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Wikipedia's blackout page appears when users access the site Screengrab via Wikipedia

Sites go offline in protest at US anti-piracy legislation

Sites such as Wikipedia, Reddit and Boing Boing are taking part in an ‘internet blackout’ today.

WIKIPEDIA IS AMONG a number of websites taking part in an internet blackout today in protest at proposed anti-piracy laws in the US.

The online encyclopedia redirects to a black screen with a political statement when you carry out a search but mobile versions of the site continue to work. The user-generated news site Reddit and the blog Boing Boing are also among the more high profile sites taking part in the blackout.

However, other popular websites like Facebook and Twitter are not taking part in the 24-hour blackout which runs until 5am tomorrow morning (GMT).

Websites and activists are opposed to the US Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA) both currently being debated in the US Congress. The laws propose to shut down websites accused of containing illegal films, music and TV programming. Read more here >

Supporters of the legislation argue that it is designed to stop revenue flowing to “rogue websites” which link to pirated material but those against it argue the legislation is poorly drafted and will damage the openness of the internet.

“The point is the bill is so over broad and so badly written that it’s going to impact all kinds of things that, you know, don’t have anything to do with stopping piracy,” Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales told the BBC.

Although some of the websites editors are uneasy about the legislation, AP reports, likening the Wikipedia decision to fight censorship with censorship.

“My main concern is that it puts the organisation in the role of advocacy, and that’s a slippery slope,” said editor Robert Lawton, a Michigan computer consultant. “Before we know it, we’re blacked out because we want to save the whales.”

Twitter chief executive Dick Costolo described the decision of some websites to shutdown as “foolish”. ”Closing a global business in reaction to single-issue national politics is foolish,” he tweeted on Monday.

Some are in solidarity with those who are shutting down while not shutting down themselves including the world’s most popular search engine Google which carries a link which reads “Please don’t censor the web!” on its homepage.

“Millions of Americans oppose SOPA and PIPA because these bills would censor the Internet and slow economic growth in the US,” the linked to page reads as the company urges Congress to “End Piracy, Not Liberty”.

The White House has raised concerns about the bills going through the House of Representatives and the Senate. While the administration has pledged to battle piracy and counterfeiting, it is defending free expression, privacy and innovation on the internet.

The administration signalled it might use its veto power, if necessary meaning the two bills are unlikely to become legislation in their present form, AP reports.

Reddit, Boing Boing plan website blackout over SOPA – but what is it?

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
36 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Luke Kelly
    Favourite Luke Kelly
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 4:17 PM

    They’re a private company so can choose not to stock it f they wish.

    To me however, it’s simply a form of censorship and the precedent it sets is dangerous. What else do they find unpalatable and wish not to stock?

    Should we remove mein kampf, or Charles Manson book too and many others as people may not like it? Lots of killers have written books.

    How about, don’t buy tit if you don;t want to read it, but don;t decide for everyone else whether they can read it or not. Why is that too much to ask?

    54
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Joanna
    Favourite Joanna
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 4:21 PM

    Tesco don’t stock the brand of wine I want I should be outraged cos it’s censorship etc.

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Willie
    Favourite Willie
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 4:21 PM

    It’s not about censorship. It’s about stopping a mass mudering psychopath profiting from his crimes.

    87
    See 13 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jay Finn
    Favourite Jay Finn
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 4:22 PM

    I agree with you but I’m sure in this case it’s about stopping a convicted criminal from making money. Part of being locked up and punished is to be denied not only your physical freedom but also freedom to participate in society in general. It’s not censorship but part of a criminals punishment.

    59
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Chuck Eastwood
    Favourite Chuck Eastwood
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 4:23 PM

    I tend to agree like. While the book is no doubt horribly distasteful removing it now is nothing more than censorship. It will be restocked elsewhere

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Luke Kelly
    Favourite Luke Kelly
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 4:24 PM

    Joanna. If you think that’s a logical response to my point you need to go away and learn how to think for yourself.

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Joanna
    Favourite Joanna
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 4:27 PM

    Nobody owes anyone a platform.

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Luke Kelly
    Favourite Luke Kelly
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 4:32 PM

    Any interview you’ve seen of murderers or documentaries on them in the US for example, were all paid an appearance fee. They too profited in that sense.

    Likewise any guest that has appeared on the Late late show in Ireland in all these years has been paid an appearance fee of between 2k and 5k of licence fee payers money. That’s for every guest regardless.

    Plenty of people get paid and profit off crimes in the public eye. Not much you can do about it

    This is a dangerous precedent however. If they are so concerned he’ll profit form it, then let them pass laws to change it in Canada as they suggested , rather than censoring it.

    People’s “outrage” as Joanna sys, has stopped the publication of the book through the worlds largest book supplier and that is not a healthy precedent on the basis of a pitiful 54k signatures in an online petition.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Young Politician
    Favourite Young Politician
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 4:34 PM

    I think a law against criminals profiting from their crimes in this way is reasonable and doesn’t qualify as censorship.

    34
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Kelly
    Favourite John Kelly
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 4:38 PM

    the issue is should he profit from it? maybe the profits should go to the victims of violence, or some charity that helps such victims or bereved familys etc. would that be a good idea?

    mein kampf is on my list of books to read, its probably rubbish. but im curious about it, i believe its a huge seller in the islamic world.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Valentine Lynam
    Favourite Valentine Lynam
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 4:40 PM

    Give the money to the family’s he has destroyed?

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Kelly
    Favourite John Kelly
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 4:46 PM

    @Valentine Lynam yea..they might not want ot touch it..imagine..being it that position and then being offered money that the perp made off the deaths of your family or partner etc…its a difficult one….

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Young Politician
    Favourite Young Politician
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 5:13 PM

    No, I don’t think that would be a good idea. There’s something fundamentally wrong with idea of the story of someone’s brutal murder being turned into a profit-making venture

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute conri
    Favourite conri
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 6:09 PM

    Ok Luke, but criminals should not benifit from their crimes, any profit should go to an organisation that fights/helps drug addicts for example, but the people who should be included in this would be the family of the girls he murdered, I would not imagine it would be nice for the mothers of these girls to know the details of her daughters death is now in the form of a book.but you are correct, it’s a diffucult call.

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Chuck Eastwood
    Favourite Chuck Eastwood
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 6:16 PM

    What in God’s names are you trying to say. Maybe you should lay off the cheap wine

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Deirdre McDonnell
    Favourite Deirdre McDonnell
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 7:07 PM

    Stupid censorship is right. As you say don’t buy it if you don’t. People actually believe books like these give others ideas! One search of him or any serial killer brings up crime scene pictures etc. Don’t buy or google this sort of thing if you don’t want to but others are interested in real crime. It doesn’t make us weird or want to copy them! I have an interest in serial killers minds and always have. I wanted to buy this now I can’t as morons now have just pushed the price through the roof for the printed ones or made them totally unavailable to people who are interested in real crime.
    Plus Charles Manson never killed anyone. People should research things before they comment!

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Anton Friendo
    Favourite Anton Friendo
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 5:08 PM

    Yet we still have to put up with Ronan Keating and Joe Duffy releasing books

    49
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gavin Scott
    Favourite Gavin Scott
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 6:55 PM

    Now i really want to read that!!!

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute conri
    Favourite conri
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 7:25 PM

    Ok, it’s probably best if no one replies directly to Deirdre

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute conri
    Favourite conri
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 7:25 PM

    Kidding Deirdre.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mr. Hoffman
    Favourite Mr. Hoffman
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 7:55 PM

    “…it was being sold for $20 (about €13).” – how do you come up with that figure?? At today’s exchange, 20 US dollars is just above 18 euro.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Shanners
    Favourite Shanners
    Report
    Feb 23rd 2016, 10:36 PM

    Canada does not use USD…. They have their own currency, Canadian Dollar..

    12
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds