Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

Senior NTMA and NAMA staff waived €850k bonuses for 2010

While some staff at the National Treasury Management Agency received bonuses, three major CEOs declined theirs.

NTMA chief executive Brendan McDonagh declined a bonus of €392,000 last year - though he did receive a salary of €490,000.
NTMA chief executive Brendan McDonagh declined a bonus of €392,000 last year - though he did receive a salary of €490,000.
Image: James Horan/Photocall Ireland

THREE CHIEF EXECUTIVES at the agencies responsible for managing the State’s assets, investments and national debt all declined their bonuses for 2010, it has emerged.

Figures obtained by RTÉ showed that while a number of staff at the National Treasury Management Agency – and NAMA, which is a subsidiary of the agency – did receive bonuses, senior managers opted not to accept theirs.

John Corrigan of the NTMA, Brendan McDonagh of NAMA, and Brian Murphy of the National Development Finance Agency all turned down their bonuses – all of which were worth at least 60 per cent of their basic salaries.

Corrigan could have received a payment of €392,000, McDonagh was due €258,000, and Murphy could have received €198,000 – meaning a combined saving of €848,000.

The trio still received salaries of €1.25m for the 2010 calendar year, however.

Corrigan’s predecessor at the helm of the NTMA, Michael Somers, was once Ireland’s top-earning public servant – famously receiving over €1m between salaries and bonuses in 2008.

McDonagh’s decision not to accept his NAMA bonus came on the back of the state’s ‘bad bank’ reporting an annual loss of €714m earlier this year.

Read next:

Comments (3 Comments)

  • First let me get my cynicism out of the way and state I’m sure they were all aware of the positive spin effect it would have on their respective career futures to have the media report their altruistic act. They also make a good enough salary to live comfortably without the bonuses.

    All that griping out of the way, credit where credit’s due and I hope more public figures and executives would follow their examples.

    @Gavan – Two questions though. Whatever happened to capping salaries of public servants and would executives/employees of the NTMA and NAMA be bound by the salary cap?

    Reply
  • Barry 29/05/11 #

    It’s great and all that they turned them down but why the he’ll are these people being offered any bonus in the first place??

    They work for the state and the state is broke and doesn’t have the money to pay people basic let alot 60% ontop of basic, also their basic is more then enough to “get by on”.

    Until the day the state isn’t broke then all bonuses for everyone should be off the table, simple as.

    Reply
  • Siobhan 29/05/11 #

    Nobody paid out of state funds should be receiving bonuses. Putting a huge burden of taxes, levies etc on earners who are trying to meet their basic needs in order to keep these top civil servants in the style they are accustomed to, is grossly unfair. What they could be doing in the working day to deserve inflated pay is beyond me. They get paid for the responsibility…..I haven’t noticed anyone standing up and taking responsibility for the mess we’re in.

    Reply

Add New Comment