Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Ryanair profits up as it offers ‘unprecedented remedies’ for Aer Lingus bid

The airline has reported a half year profit and a rise in passenger numbers in its latest results.

Image: Rui Vieira/PA Wire/Press Association Images

RYANAIR HAS REPORTED a half year profit of €596 million, up 10 per cent, as it said today that it had offered an “unprecedented remedies” package in its bid to secure its takeover of Aer Lingus.

In its latest results, the Irish airline says that as well as profits being up on the same period last year, passenger numbers have also risen to 48 million to the end of September.

Revenue is up to €3.1 billion, a 15 per cent rise on the same period last year, and its gross cash exceeded €3.9 billion which it says is an all-time record.

Chief Executive Michael O’Leary also issued a separate statement in which he said that the airline had submitted a package to EU competition authorities which he said remedied all of the so-called ‘merger to monopoly routes’.

He said that Ryanair was determined “to explore all commercial options to address any competition concerns the EU may have in order to secure approval for its proposed merger”.

Ryanair already owns 29.82 per cent of the issued share capital of Aer Lingus but has failed in two attempts to purchase a majority holding in the Irish airline.

In July it made a €694 million bid for Aer Lingus which has urged its shareholders to reject the offer.

O’Leary said that the recent British Airways and BMI merger and approval and subsequent Aegean and Olympic merger “vindicate” Ryanair’s view that its offer for Aer Lingus will secure EU approval.

He said: “Consolidation is an essential part of making EU airlines more competitive. It has already taken place in core EU countries.”

In its financial results Ryanair warned that while it is on target to grow traffic it expected it to be broadly flat as up to 80 aircraft will be grounded to limit the impact on high oil prices.

“Recession, competition and very low fare competition at new bases will constrain profitability during H2, although we now expect full year yields to rise by up to 4 per cent,” the airline said.

Read: Ryanair looks to Russia as next destination

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (54 Comments)

  • “Anyone who thinks Ryanair flights are some sort of bastion of sanctity is wrong, if anyone looks like their sleeping, we wake them up to sell them things.” Michael O’Leary

    Reply
    • Your lookin at that as a negitive i look at it as a positive he is determined for the company not to fail even if it means the hard sell .. And altho its a quite it was said light heartedly and as a joke

      Reply
  • God help us if this is approved Ryanair has to be the worst airline I’ve ever flown with (they don’t care about their customers at all) I refuse to fly with them and it helps that the last few flights I’ve been on Aer Lingus have been cheaper.

    Reply
    • True. They started off being the “low fare” airline but are now the “low cost” airline. So what if there costs are low? A lot of their fares aren’t.

      Aer Lingus are cheaper, the same or just a few bib more in so many cases.

      Reply
    • Rubbish! I’m a regular flier, averaging 8 flights a month. The majority of which are on Ryanair. To be honest, I hate the flight itself because its just a barrage of SELL SELL SELL. But if you can get past that, then it’s a brilliant service. Follow their rules, book the flights well in advance and Ryanair is a great way to travel. Nearly always on time, they never lose a bag, clean/new planes. They do exactly what they say on the tin.

      Reply
    • tom 05/11/12 #

      in fairness bags handled by airports as all airlines use the airport baggage system.

      Reply
    • Grand if your travelling alone but I’d never travel with ryanair and small family. Taxi-ing down the run way and we were still waiting on a child lap belt. The dog in a dress was fuming that I had the gall to ask for one. Never again

      Reply
  • Sean C 05/11/12 #

    There’s a name for a country run by a CEO, it’s called a dictatorship.

    Reply
    • Aleo 05/11/12 #

      In this particular CEO’s case, it would have to be.

      Reply
    • Aleo 05/11/12 #

      If this particular CEO were given that role, a dictatorship would soon be all that would safeguard him.

      Reply
    • Is O’Leary running the country now?! I’m confused cos your comment doesn’t seem to be for this story….

      Maybe we could do with a dictatorship – a benevolent one. Get rid of politicians with no experience in their remit and replace them with people who are accountable, fireable…..

      Could be better than this illusion that our say actually matters…..

      Reply
    • No ones calling for a dictatorship no one said he can do as he pleases wit the money it would be spent more wiser than at this vurrent moment in time

      Reply
    • Sean C 05/11/12 #

      Tomy you need to read the comments, not just the story. There are a number of comments that seam to think running people is the same as running a business.

      Reply
    • Sean C – I have my comments organised by popularity not date. If you want your comment to appear linear then the only way for you to do that is to add a reply (rather than a new comment) to where any reader can see the context…

      Thanks for clearing that up though.

      Reply
  • Everyone complains about ryanair but how are they 10% up ???? Basically because we irish love a winge but love good value more ha

    Reply
    • Ryanair have proved that they can make money no matter what adversaries are placed in front of it. There has to be credit given for this. When you see what’s happening with Aer Lingus, it would really make you wonder why the gulf is so big between them. I don’t think Ryanair getting complete control of Aer Lingus would benefit Ireland, but a complete overhaul of Aer Lingus must be tackled soon. That particular airline is dated, and hasn’t adapted, as it should have to modern day Ireland.

      Reply
  • Why is it that every time a story about Ryanair’s financial success is published people come out with the old chestnut that O’Leary should be running the country. If anyone can tell me how running a low cost airline is a qualification for running an entire country than please feel free to enlighten me.

    Reply
  • Hate them hope they don’t ever get their hands on Aer Lingus!

    Reply
  • Ryanair have paid 0 euro corporation tax in Ireland for the last 3 years or so according to a Trinity Professor who thinks it’s time for Corporations in Ireland to start paying their fair share, the majority pay 4% or less in Corporation tax. Think it’s about time that this ‘taboo subject’ was tackled. Why should the rest of us be bled dry while those who are making huge profits are not even asked to contribute anything!

    Reply
  • David 05/11/12 #

    O’ Leary for Taoiseach. Can see the union leaders faces now.

    Reply
  • Aleo 05/11/12 #

    Etihad would do a lot more for Aer Lingus, and Ireland, than Ryanair.

    Reply
  • He’s like a spoilt child who doesn’t understand the word NO!

    Reply
  • O leary should be runnin the country neer mind just the airlines he is efficenta and cost effective

    Reply
    • Fully agreed!

      Reply
    • And cut everything to the bare minimum like he has with his airline?? :-D

      Reply
    • As opposed to what, over spend and run a deficit? He does cut everything but runs a profitable, sustainable business because of prudent financial management. That sort of common sense attitude is exactly what this country needs

      Reply
    • You couldn’t apply his business strategy to the running of this country, while he does make cuts and run a profitable business its entirely different making the same changes when it comes to public service, private sector, semi state, social welfare etc… There would be mass protests and the country would be on strike. I’m not saying cuts aren’t needed, I’m just saying it wouldn’t work if he were in charge…

      Reply
    • Fart box it wouldnt work because the counrty would strike is your response so basically it would work but you wouldnt allow it to work

      Reply
    • Strike? What’s a strike? His policy on unions is spot on as well…. Don’t recognise them. If you strike, you lose your job and someone willing to work gets it instead. :)

      Reply
    • no, everybody would cooperate with changes being made to their working conditions and not protest, they would simply be laid off and someone from the dole cue that is willing to work would replace them… Wake up twonks, thats not what happens in the real world…

      Reply
    • Fartbox its clear to me you have the business acumen of a cup of tea

      Reply
    • Explain ur arguement fartbox heres mine

      If the country is running a deficit it needs to be reduced not swept under the rug we’ll deal wit it later. If o leary was in charge or any good businessman for that matter see the goverments wage bill would be halved the expensise would be halved and the health system would be ran an awfull lot better and the people in the ps jobs that sit around doin nothing would e sitting around doing nothing for 188 euro a week
      ( im not claiming gardai. Teacher Nurses and firemen do nothing before yas all start )

      Reply
    • I hate flying with them. I’d sooner take a boat or any other Airline. They are horrible.

      Reply
    • Andrew they are cheap and reliable. Pay for what you get. Have allowed me to travel far more often than if I had flown with anybody else.

      Reply
    • @jay thompson, it seems to ne like you have actually asked Oleary his opinions on this matter, are you stating for sure that is exactly what he’d do?

      If such violent cuts were implemented Oleary style, education would suffer, crime would rise hugely so he’d have to spend more on garda resources etc. I know state they wouldnt be cut, but you never know with him, goverment is capable of making the cuts so why wouldnt a businessman looking to make profits do it.

      Although i would love to see him let loose on the dail, cuts to expenses and wages would see em all run back to their old teaching jobs : )

      Feck it, forget about everything else i said,

      O leary for Taoiseach :-)

      Reply
    • Michael O Leary has said that Children’s Allowance should be scrapped entirely and yet he is still collecting it for his own children. Someone like him running the country would be disasterous, he is completely out of touch with the harsh realities facing the majority of people here. It’s very easy to say, “cut,cut,cut” when those “cuts” won’t affect you in the slightest.

      Reply
    • O’Leary might be a good businessman but all businesses are different. Anyone who thinks that a country should be run on a ryanair model is quite simply out of their mind – it’s a spurious, populous, short-sighted call that would turn this already crippled country into an indefinite coma.

      It’s like saying that O’Leary should be the next soccer manager – pointless.

      Reply
    • FartBox 05/11/12 #

      Bottom line is, we would all be in abject poverty if he were to run this country.

      Reply
    • Of course it couldnt be ran on the ryanair model its a country not an airline its impossible to hae a “no frills” country

      The point is that the country should be ran like a business and why not have someone running it whos business is still highly profitable even tho were in a recession and half the country claim they hate traveling with them

      Well someone likes traveling with them if there 10% up

      Reply
  • Low expenses efficient service. Now thats a lesson the public service could do with. Well as opposed to extremely high cost shite service.
    And before you start I’m not talking about guards, nurses and firefighter.

    Reply
  • Yeah thats true we would be ran at bare minimum but still getting a service ulike as it is now and see that bailout we needed if we had a good business man at the helm we would be put of this bother alot faster

    and que the 50 red thumbs from ps workers who think anyone mentioning the goverment spending is directly attacking there wage

    Reply
    • No red thumbs, just a reminder maybe…. would you have said this 10 years ago about Sean Quinn? Very possibly.

      Viewing Ireland as nothing more than a business is ridiculously short sighted. And if you’re growing that ‘tache for Movember then there’s no way I trust you cos there’s no way you started clean shaven like you should have!

      Reply
    • The country should be ran wit a balace between business and social responsibility

      Instead of spending money we dont have on things we cant afford ie government wages expenses ps top level pay and spend the money on front line services instead

      And as for my facial hair that brings no relivence to your already pointless arguement

      Reply
    • Jesus man, get a sense of humour!

      Reply
  • i agree with you jay he is brillant.

    Reply
    • He has proven to be not a nice person, I could say a lot more, but defamation and all of that. If you want him to run the country, you will get what you deserve.

      I don’t understand him. You can be successful without being a proper little turd.

      Reply
  • Andrew seen as were dropping quotes

    “i cant understand how my business failed ” -darren who owned the shop next to mine wet under last year

    “Couldnt get the customers through the door to cover te wages and rent ”
    ( majority if the businesses who went under over the last 3 yers)

    Te cost o

    Reply
  • Most of you know nothing about Ryanair and the way it’s run. None of it ever makes the papers.
    Once again the Irish people are happy to believe the legend that was Anglo, Sean Quinn, the property market. In all cases everybody believed and any detractor was shot down. Whatever happened to healthy scepticism. Seems like the Irish can never learn.

    Reply
  • I’ve heard it’s making extra profit from the selling off body parts confiscated from passengers at the gate since it brought in the recent controversial 1kg internal organ limit per/person per/flight , per/leg, per torso per whatever they can get away with.

    Reply
  • * quote

    Reply
  • * quote

    Reply

Add New Comment