Welcome to our Public Beta Site - What does this mean?
Dublin: 10 °C Wednesday 16 May, 2012

Report: Facebook to file for entry to stock markets next week

Facebook's COO Sheryl Sandberg - considered the site's
Facebook's COO Sheryl Sandberg - considered the site's "adult supervision" - could become the world's richest self-made woman if Facebook does float on the stock exchange.
Image: Jean-christophe Bott/AP

THE WORLD’S LARGEST social networking site is set to make its debut on the stock markets in a few months, if reports this evening are accurate.

The Wall Street Journal reports that Facebook is preparing to file paperwork for an Initial Public Offering this coming Wednesday, with Morgan Stanley likely to be the agent for the deal.

Entry to the stock markets has been long anticipated for Facebook, with many investors believing that a public filing was simply a matter of time.

It is expected that an entry into public ownership will make the site worth between $75 billion and $100 billion when it launches, and make an instant billionaire out of its founder and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg.

Zuckerberg owns 24 per cent of the company – meaning his wealth, which is only theoretical at present because there is no open market for Facebook shares, would come realised – and worth possibly up to $24 billion.

It would also mean that Sheryl Sandberg, the site’s COO, would become one of the world’s richest self-made women: thought to own between 1.25 and 2.5 per cent of the company, her stake could be worth up to $2.5 billion.

This would put her close to the wealth of the world’s richest woman, Oprah Winfrey, who Forbes says is worth $2.7 billion.

Even if Sandberg’s stake is at the smaller end, her wealth would match that of the second-wealthiest self-made woman on Earth, Harry Potter author JK Rowling who is thought to be worth around $1 billion.

The deal will also mean that U2 duo Bono and The Edge (real names Paul Hewson and David Evans) would probably become billionaires too: one of their investment vehicles, Elevation Partners, owns a 1.5 per cent stake in the site.

That stake would therefore be worth up to $1.5 billion – far more than the $210m they paid for their stake just over two years ago.

Read Next:

Comments (34 Comments)

  • Colm 27/01/12 #
    Report this comment

    Cue begrudgers bashing Bono

    Reply
    • Daisy Chainsaw 27/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      Because he’s a hypocritical tax dodger.

    • Colm 27/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      And we’re off

    • Larry Bird 27/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      I don’t care, I’ll begrudge the s**t out of that. It takes money to make money, the rich won’t stop getting richer while the rest of us struggle with levies, taxes and the crappy USC.

    • SeanS 27/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      So Bono, Edge and Zuckerberg have always been rich?

    • Larry Bird 28/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      No Sean, but currently are and fair play to them for that. What I’m commenting on is that when your rich the ratio of future incomes to current net worth seems exponentially higher than someone on average wage. It’s not breaking news but frustratingly true.

    • Muc Beag 28/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      Frustratingly true but not necessarily unfair, as some would make it out to be. Zuckerberg and Sandberg made a great website, Bono and The Edge made a smart investment in said site – none of which we can begrudge any of them for. Though I will say I think that Elevation Partners got lucky with this one, their previous track record with Palm/WebOS et al hasn’t been spectacular.

    • Tensing Norgay 28/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      Now ,you planted the seed!

  • Gary Walsh 27/01/12 #
    Report this comment

    Think of what the government could do with the tax on Bono’s profi….Oh, wait.

    Reply
  • Aydo 27/01/12 #
    Report this comment

    Good tunes, total tosser.

    Reply
  • Begrudgy 27/01/12 #
    Report this comment

    Would not touch those shares even if i had money. Only way they are going is down. Facebook is a fad. It will decline in the years ahead with the continued lauch of new technology.

    Reply
    • Killian Maher 27/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      @begrudgery have we learnt nothing from the past you don’t need money to buy shares! Ya can borrow a truck load and sure don’t buy the shares… Ya leverage the borrowed cash on a contract for difference and sure what’s the worst that could happen! If ya lose sure the rest of us can pick up the tab we are happy to ;)

    • Shane O'Connor 27/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      Agreed. It’s a bubble. Usage statistics are already in decline and will plummet further when they roll out integrated news feed advertising at the end of the year. Would not buy this stock even if I could!

  • Bono “Likes” this.

    Reply
  • corky2004 27/01/12 #
    Report this comment

    Remember the excitement when Eircom was first floated and it was soon worth f all on the stock markets?

    Sames going to happen to Facebook.
    It’s already way overvalued.

    Reply
  • 1 Human Being 27/01/12 #
    Report this comment

    Wonder how much ipo stock has been handed out already. It’s another groupon. Facebook has hit a wall as its still hasn’t sorted out advertisement revenue with google. The first day bounce will be the main earner for any one with ipo stock.

    Reply
  • Anthony O'Brien 27/01/12 #
    Report this comment

    Sheryl Sandberg would be a good catch though!!!!

    Reply
  • Tom McDermott 27/01/12 #
    Report this comment

    Buy buy buy!!! Google started at around $100 and now the’re $579.94 – I cant see facebook failing, It might decline a bit short term, but It will grow & grow. Over 50% Irish INTERNET USERS use facebook. Some countries haven’t even bothered with it yet, but they will as the world changes

    Reply
    • Cpm 27/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      Google have a product. Facebook have a popular website. Massive difference.

    • Tom McDermott 27/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      Products can be bettered, Eg: Chrome v’s IE & Firefox, Every company tries to better a product, A Massive social network is hard to copy or better as google+ has proven.

    • Report this comment

      CPM… Remind me again of what google actually was when it started out? What’s that you say? A popular website? ;)

    • Tom McDermott 27/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      Also want to add EVERY smart TV, Smart Blue Ray player and Xbox now have facebook built into them. The first two haven’t took off yet, In a few years everyone will have one

    • Ryan Murphy 28/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      Good man Tom. Tell that to AOL, bought Bebo for $850m, and sold for almost a tenth of that. If I were Zuckerberg or your one, I’d sell the shit out of my holding. It’s not as if either of them have any executive authority now anyway.

    • Ryan Murphy 28/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      My point being, it’s horrendously over valued. We have seen this pattern before. It doesn’t mean we should shy away from investment, but we should know when the bubble is expanding.

    • Muc Beag 28/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      Google are a bit more than a web company now. Licensing of the Android software is printing money for them, especially considering the versatility of it. Like Tom said above – TV’s, tablets, phones… Hell, even some home appliances run on Android. Never mind their other projects, like their office software (Gmail, Docs, Calendar, Chrome OS, Google Apps) or their driverless cars. They are the new Microsoft essentially, having evolved into a software company.

      Can’t see where Facebook can go outside the web to be honest. Maybe they can go further than Google could in terms of target ads and crowdsourcing but that’s forming less and less of Google’s business and is a somewhat limited market.

      Beginning to wonder when this web bubble will burst…

    • Tom McDermott 28/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      All points taking on board. Myself I think facebook is gone too far now to ever be challenged. Bit like youtube. If you want to watch a video on the internet you’ll go straight to youtube, If someone wants to open up a social network account they will pick facebook. Bebo died because facebook took over same as myspace

    • Tom McDermott 28/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      http://apps.facebook.com/gooogleplus/ (ignore the name googleplus) took 5 minutes to do, I can see facebook pushing the likes of this shortly. Most websites will integrate with facebook

  • Cpm 28/01/12 #
    Report this comment

    @muc hopefully the bubble will be confined to social medi. I don’t fancy another ’99

    Reply
    • Muc Beag 28/01/12 #
      Report this comment

      Not at all so confined, investors are throwing money at any and every web start-up out in Palo Alto, thinking they’ll be the next Facebook or Google. It’s a joke.

  • Report this comment

    bye bye facebook and by the way there is no such thing a self-made person!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  • Report this comment

    Social networking is absolutely not a fad. Who honestly believes that people will suddenly stop wanting to share and communicate with others using technology? Probably the same people who said the Internet was a fad.

    Remember when Apple just sold computers? Or when Amazon was just a book retailer? Or when Google was just a search engine? Facebook’s future will depend entirely on the people running the company and their ability to innovate and expand their product set to keep ahead of potential competitors. With content deals, gaming, an app development platform, a crazy amount of rich data, and most importantly 800,000,000 users, the potential for that company is absolutely huge.

    Reply
  • Dave Seacy 28/01/12 #
    Report this comment

    Bono the ole dog will be cashing in !!! Money makes money. Wonder will he donate any to charity ???

    Reply

Add New Comment