Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Tuesday 18 June, 2013

Column: Did you hear the one about the developer, the banker and the politician?

Former trader Nick Leeson on bidding wars at boom-time black-tie balls… and how someone saw fit to flick the over-ride switch so the excess could continue.

Nick Leeson

POWER AND MONEY corrupts. If you needed any reminder, each and every time you read a news story about a bank, there is ample evidence.

The Mahon Tribunal has  shown that it is not only restricted to the walls of the big banks. (Though, when times were good, the number being paid for political influence was far greater than those just with influence in the corridors of finance.)

Is anybody surprised? I doubt it. We all saw it happening and turned a blind eye. I moved to Ireland at the beginning of 2003, not the pinnacle of the excess but the property boom was certainly motoring along. Every Thursday, Friday and Saturday there would be a black-tie ball in the Radisson Hotel in Galway. The must-have attendee for any charity was the long list of developers and bankers, the more the merrier and if you could land a politician or two, the developers and bankers were guaranteed to attend.

I remember a car worth €15,000 being bought for €75,000, in a charity bidding war between developers

You could count on the developers entering a bidding frenzy for the most meaningless piece of tat and you were sure to make a lot of money. I remember one notable occasion someone bidding €75,000 for a car worth €15,000, just to show that they could but more importantly to win the bidding war against the other developers.

The Mahon Tribunal tells us nothing new. In those days wherever you bumped into a developer, the banker and politician weren’t too far behind. There are many instances of them setting up companies together to profit from the influence that they could all bring to bear. It would be wrong to tar everyone with the same brush just as every banker isn’t bad but you’d regularly see the three huddled together at racecourses discussing the latest horse that they had bought and parading in front of the stands with their latest winner. So the Mahon Tribunal tells us nothing new; it just confirms what we had already seen for ourselves.

When a full report is written about the financial collapse in Ireland, the bankers and politicians will stand side by side in shouldering the blame. When charges are brought – sorry that should read if charges are brought – the bankers and politicians should stand side by side. But maybe that is why there haven’t been any charges. The murky world  of politics and banking were hand-in-glove during that period and the list of guilty parties would be numerous and quite illuminating.

Banking survives on confidence. If you think the bank is likely to go out of business, you would not deposit your money. If the elected government of a certain time were likely to prove corrupt and seek bribes for the slightest favour, you wouldn’t elect them. But both happened and we allowed it to occur, by allowing the banks to run out of control with our money and electing a government with a frightening lack of moral fibre and complete incompetence when it came to keeping the banks under control.

The financial woes that we are suffering in Ireland are not because of the investment arms of the banks. It’s not because someone was trying to speculate aggressively in some new exotic market. It is clearly as a failure within their bread and butter business; lending.

Banks have lent money for hundreds of years, it’s quite a simple business: You lend a multiple of your asset base. It is understood that there will be a minor level of default but the level of default is many times underwritten by the amount that  you charge for the service.  The math is very simple; most junior school children could complete it successfully. It is checked daily within the banks and reports are sent to the regulator and the Central Bank who look at the numbers from a slightly more macro perspective but the computations do not increase in complexity. When you start to approach the upper limits, lending is pared back because it becomes slightly more dangerous.

I asked a friend where he thought the over-ride switch was flicked. “The Galway Tent”, he said.

During the last financial crisis, which is now only very slowly improving, somebody somewhere hit the over-ride button. Not once but they kept the finger on the button for years and years. Rest assured the banks were initiating reports that detailed their lending portfolio; rest assured that these same reports were sent to the regulator and the Central Bank for their own perusal. As limits were breached, as they undoubtedly were, somebody said it was okay.

That somebody wasn’t a regulator or a central banker – they simply would not have had the authority to do so. I asked a good friend a couple of weeks ago where they thought the over-ride switch was flicked. The answer was, “The Galway Tent”. They are probably right. As bankers, politicians and developers slapped themselves on the back at the Galway races and congratulated themselves on the excesses of the previous twelve months, somebody flicked the switch and said: ‘It’ll be grand’.

Accountability for the crisis is still a long way off and I still remain sceptical that there is any real desire to bring the right people to trial. I have long believed that this is because of the shadow that is cast across many politicians from this period. In Iceland the premier faces charges of incompetence and negligence in a courtroom. In Ireland, nothing.

Read next:

Comments (48 Comments)

  • Man when you see it summarised like this… It makes any right-thinking, decent person want to puke!

    Reply
    • Political complicity was certainly required to inflate the bubble that has lead to this crisis. However, is offering enhanced powers to politicans to resolve this crisis and ensure it is not repeated. I think not. Enhanced powers for politicans only offers enhanced opportunities for corruption.
      While Nicks article offers insights into the crisis and again raises a very important question. What role did politicans play in this? It falls short of offering a comprehensive view of the crisis. Banks and economies across the west are still in the worst crisis since the 1930’s (possibly worse). The ‘Galway tent’ does not explain this. Bank balance sheets and public spending & borrowing has swelled to unprecedented levels across the western hemisphere.
      The provision of banking regulation and claims of governance restraint have now been shown to be illusory. In fact, due to our currency systems, western governments must both allow and encourage banks to continue to inflate their balance sheets rather than imposing restraint. In addition, central banks are also pursuing inflationary policies and have been since well before the crisis.
      http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-07-09/markets/30018342_1_debt-central-banks-fiat

      Reply
    • As usual in the news, it’s always ‘bankers and politicians were hand in hand’, ‘we turned a blind eye’… well we’re still pretending it’s not happening now, eh?

      I hate this tone of self congratulation we all adopt in retrospectives. Let’s get a few scapegoats with no influence and longer, hang all our anger on them, and drive them out of town!

      C’mon, stand up and say it loud! It’s still corrupt, bankers and politicians are still hand in hand!

      Reply
  • I agree with the overall picture painted here except for your statement that “We all saw it happening but turned a blind eye” I know from my own business experience that ordinary guys like me in regular businesses were fighting against a system skewed in favour of these developers all throughout this period, sure banks would give you loads of money if you were interested in property but they put you through the mill for regular business loans ( rightly so) while property developers had almost open access to the bank vault.

    Reply
  • Do you remember the details of the Nick Leeson case Frankie? Doesn’t look like it from that simplistic comment. And to be fair, It’s as good a summary of what happened as I have seen so far.

    Reply
  • Reg 03/04/12 #

    The whole thing was a giant pyramid scheme. Simple as that!

    Reply
    • You’re right of course Reg! However in a normal pyramid scheme, the participants lose! This time it seems the sensible non participants were the big losers!

      Reply
    • @ Mike

      That’s the idea of getting the politicians & public servants in the loop. And the present lot are not much better.

      The answer is really simple. If we want politicians to really represent ordinary citizens we must insist they earn their living by their labour & at a rate & accumulation not much more than average ordinary citizens. Cut the corruption at source. Insist politicians & public servants really work for public purpose, not their own enrichment.

      Reply
  • Nick giving out about black tie balls? Ffs during his time with Galway united a black tie ball was arranged as a fund raiser and was a major example of the excess that he is now giving out about. …event was full of the great and good and totally removed from the everyday fan who went to matches.

    Reply
    • It was indeed, and I’d like to ask Nick Leeson if, during his stewardship, Galway United paid all the costs related to the running of this ball?
      In the case of GUFC, “accountability for the crisis is still a long way off” as the man says.

      Reply
    • Fagan's 03/04/12 #

      There is a big difference between a Galway United Black Tie affair and a Galway Tent black tie affair where you have developers giving massive personal and political donations to FF TD’s and Ministers.

      There was nothing unusual at the FF tent in a Minister been given several thousand in 50′s and told to put down a few bets. Sure it was all great fun and it went on wholesale but we’ll never talk about that.

      Reply
  • mattoid 03/04/12 #

    Excellent article as usual Nick. I note that those involved in character assassination above have not been disputing the content of the article itself.

    Reply
  • Ah c’mon, you can’t blame it all on poor Bertie and his cohort, after all we were the ones who put them there for 3 consecutive terms!!

    Reply
  • Next week the Journal will have an article on the dangers of drugs written by John Gilligan.

    Reply
  • I agree with your conclusion. Politicians of all stripe caused this mess in collusion with bankers and developers. However I do not agree with two particular sentences which lets them off the hook. “We all saw it happening and turned a blind eye.” and “we allowed it to occur”. We didn’t, we saw it but were just powerless to do anything against it. In truth what could a joe soap in a semi D do about what we all saw? Tell me, I’d really like to know? Vote in a different govt to FF? You really thing FG and Lab would have done something different? No. Didn’t think so. We the people are not culpable. They the corrupt are. Delete 2 sentences and you are spot on.

    Reply
  • censored 03/04/12 #

    Excellent standard of reporting. May we know who the friend is who reported what happened in the Galway tent?

    Reply
  • Stick it in the pan.

    Reply
  • Are these the same property developers that funded Galway Utd when Nick (the man who brought one of the oldest banks to its knees) was CEO and basically ran Galway Utd the same way as they ran their development companies…… I.e. really bad and left nothing behind for a rainy day…….

    People in glasshouses Nick…… People in glasshouses

    Reply
  • Now, Journal go and investigate the veracity of “Nick/Tuck meets Shameless”

    Ferrari & Range Rover driving plastic surgeon squatting in South Dublin.

    Reply
  • Actually, t’was ever thus. Read Anthony Trollope’s “The Way We Live Now” (1875) for a perfect foretelling. It was inspired by the financial scandals of the early 1870s, and lashes out at the pervading dishonesty of the age, commercial, political, moral, and intellectual. And it’s a good read.

    “It’s a story about the fantasy of easy money twisting the lives of a dozen characters. One young woman, desperate to marry well, says: “Who thinks about love nowadays?” Conveniently, she blames her own avarice on the corruption of the age. Trollope and his characters consider their historic period uniquely corrupt.

    In the 1870s, Trollope spent 18 months in Australia and the United States. When he returned to England with freshened eyes, he was disgusted by the financial immorality of the upper classes and those yearning to join their ranks. Dishonest stock manipulation had reached so high in society that many people no longer thought stealing disgraceful; a dishonest life was admirable if lived “in a gorgeous palace with pictures on all its walls, and gems in all its cupboards, with marble and ivory in all its corners.” Ladies and gentlemen in grand houses spoke about the moral standards of society, but primitive greed dictated their business decisions.”

    Reply
  • The commentators above would want to look into the author’s time at (and role in the downfall of) Galway United to get a real measure of the man. Some of his dealing’s & statements have been outrageous.

    Neil, I have no respect for you and no regard for what you say.

    I’m also stunned at the Journal’s decision to give him a platform.

    Reply
  • A little distasteful perhaps. I know you treat your own banking history with humour on the speaking circuit at charity and business events, but that’s not to say you have a higher moral ground to discuss elementary bank finance, or the over exuberance and over confidence of bankers?
    I am not supportive of the troika you highlight! But I disagree with your tone of sneering and holier than thou attitude

    Reply
  • Rich coming from one of the biggest speculators, and tried to cover up his ballsup. Lending for building houses for which there are no buyers is also speculation.

    Reply
  • Why don’t we just get on with bailing ourselves out. Articles like this just rub salt on open wounds.

    Reply
  • Hi Nick Your having a laugh,How can you judge didnt you spend time in prison for fraud in a bank.

    Reply
  • Oh yes, and somewhat ‘ironic’ when you google the author too! ;)

    Reply
  • Can we have the punchline to the header?

    OWWW! …that hurt!!

    Reply

Add New Comment