Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
PERMANENT TSB AND Springboard Mortgages have written to 1,372 mortgage holders to inform them about “serious failures” in the management of their loans.
According to a statement from the firms today, up to 61 homeowners who were impacted by the mistakes in interest rates charged lost their properties.
As many as 22 of those people may have avoided this situation and kept their homes had the failures not occurred.
As part of the redress scheme announced today, those who lost ownership of their home will receive compensation payment of €50,000. If the property was a buy-to-let, the compensation will be reduced to €25,000.
In cases where PTSB’s failure was a “key factor”, any monies still owed by the customer on the mortgage account will be written off.
An investigation by the Central Bank revealed that other customers may also have “suffered serious consequences as a result of the failures”.
Permanent TSB CEO Jeremy Masding
These effects included:
having to pay higher mortgage repayments than should have been the case;
ending up in arrears that may not have occurred;
being engaged in legal proceedings that may not have been necessary.
The events occurred after homeowners lost their contractual right to a tracker rate because of the failures in the management of the accounts.
PTSB chairman Alan Cook and CEO Jeremy Masding have apologised to the customers, saying the failure was “deeply regrettable”.
“The failures which occurred have had very serious consequences for impacted customers and we apologise unreservedly on behalf of the Group to them and to all our customers,” they said.
We are truly sorry that this has occurred and our absolute focus now is on correcting the position of every impacted customer as speedily as possible.
With a particular focus on those who lost their homes, the executives added:
We acknowledge that the bank’s failure may have been a factor in events that ultimately led to some customers losing the property linked to the mortgage. We will do everything in our power to help these customers.
Advertisement
The customers impacted include 1,152 PTSB loan holders and 220 Springboard Mortgage Limited customers.
If I lost my home because of Permanent TSB I'd be telling them to stick their compensation and suing.
The bank’s admission came as it reported its first half-year profit since 2007. It just snuck into the black with an underlying return of €1 million over the six months to the end of June, although that was before once-off charges of €432 million.
The result was a turnaround from the €171 million loss it recorded for its core business for the same period in 2014.
Just under 75% of the bank remains in taxpayer hands after a share sale in April and about 40% of its mortgage customers are still in arrears.
A redress scheme
Meanwhile, a Mortgage Redress Programme will be established to offer compensation to those affected and customers are being asked to consider their options in respect of tracker interest rates.
For all Springboard customers, an incorrect rate was applied to accounts so redress and compensation will be paid. They have since been moved to the correct rate.
The initial failure was when PTSB failed to inform certain customers fully of the consequences of their decisions to break from a fixed rate or discounted tracker rate early.
Other customers had a contractual right to be offered a tracker rate at the end of any fixed rate period. However due to a failure by permanent tsb that option was not communicated to them at the end of their fixed rate period.
The errors with the accounts occurred between 2006 and 2011.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
This is only half the story…..springboard Mortgages was a joint venture between permanent Tsb and Merill Lynch. Yes the same Merill Lynch who were fined hundreds of millions of dollars for exploiting people with sub prime loans in the states and the same Permanent we bailed out with taxpayers money when they screwed up. Oh did I mention the same Merill were paid for advice the week of the bank guarantee by the government. 3.8 million euro for about 3 days work. They left the market and stopped lending sub primes when they got into hot water in the states but what did Permanent do….they sold the Springboard loans to Mars Capital earlier this year , essentially a vulture fund looking to make a killing. So these finding are only scratching the surface of the skulduggery that these institutions have been up to , sub prime loans were given at extraordinarily high interest rates in the knowledge that there would be defaults on the loans and they would seek repossession , I’m delighted to hear people who did go thru the legal nightmare. Are getting balances written off but I’d like to see far stiffer punishments for the guys responsible for the outrageous behaviour , I won’t hold my breath.
What is wrong with the world nowadays ? People will do anything to make money and let people suffer taking their homes off them just to make extra money, suppose these people have to answer to their maker when that day comes, by God I wouldn’t like to be them
they take ur home and throw u out,everything that these poor people worked so hard to buy and make a life for themselves and their families and they are offered €50,000,it’s a disgrace, they should be bought a house by the bank and help them to rebuild their lives, I hope none of these people took their own lives because of the bank,no accountability
Ten people have given this comment a red thumb…..what F*****G. planet are they on….what is in this comment that you don’t agree with….perhaps its the “stiffer punishments for the guys responsible”…. honestly I despair of some people at times…
Lets not forget those who’s marriages broke up over extra financial hardship, or those who took or attempted to take their own lives because they could see no way out, the kids of families who had to go without for years, the ones who were hit by bank charges because standing orders bounced with the burden of higher than normal payments.
How about those who couldn’t afford to buy food, or didn’t turn on the heat for an extra couple of weeks in winter, people who are now on medication for depression or blood pressure… people who’s credit ratings were destroyed… All because the mortgage was prioritised.
This bank & it’s management intentionally defrauded these people. Not one of them will see jail or any penalty.
I’ve been affected by this, as well as someone else I know. It’s been six years now. I’ll never get that time back, nor will my family. I’m glad it’s coming to an end, but there’s a very bitter taste in my mouth.
What about the people still in their homes who have struggled to keep them but were never informed about the tracker option at the end of the fixed rate period? Can they now change?
What are the consequences for PTSB and it’s senior staff? Resigning matter at least and legal proceedings? Seriously? Are these legitimate errors, or are they being labelled errors because one way or another the facts were going to emerge at this time? Irish banks have a long history of accidents with the customers loosing out.
Well said. It’s notable that the ubiquitous “errors” which occur in the corporate world would be categorized as fraud if perpetrator and victim were reversed.
The Libor rate was not rigged by low level accountants or programmers. That’s just one recent example of a tsunami of fraud. The global financial/banking sector is systemically corrupt and exploitative with almost daily revelations of “errors” which invariably benefit the corporation at the expense of the ordinary individual.
To ge ta sense of this, here’s a few extracts from an article from the U.S last year titled.
“The Financial Sector Is the Greatest Parasite in Human History”
• In economics, the financial sector is typically lumped in with the insurance sector and real estate (the financial portion of the real estate sector, not construction) sector. Together, the sectors are often abbreviated and called the FIRE sector. In this article I will talk mainly about the finance portion of the FIRE sector since it is by far the largest, most visible, and most corrupt.
• The problem is that the financial, insurance, and real estate (FIRE) sectors do not actually produce any goods or services.
• The job of the finance sector is simply to manage existing resources. It creates nothing. Therefore, the smaller the financial sector is the more real wealth there is for the rest of society to enjoy. The bigger the financial sector becomes the more money it siphons off from the productive sectors.
• But wait! There’s more! Mutual funds and your average retail investor are relatively unsophisticated, so a new industry has popped up to take advantage of them. It’s called “high frequency trading” or HFT for short. These are powerful computers programmed to take advantage of “dumb” traders in the market. These HFT firms place their computers physically next to the stock exchange computers in the datacenters and buy access to market quotes milliseconds before they are made public. They use these and other advantages to skim profits from other legitimate investors (that is, people buying stocks because they want to own part of the underlying company).
• In 2012, hedge funds removed $50.5B from their investors’ pockets. In fact, according to an article in Jacobin Magazine, the top 25 hedge fund managers make more money than the CEOs of all S&P 500 companies combined. Combined!
• First, over 10 years the returns for hedge funds are atrocious, only about 25% in total.
• Speculation by the financial sector in the commodities market is impacting the entire world. The passage of the Commodities Futures Modernization Act (CFMA) has allowed big banks to engage in almost limitless speculation in the commodities market.
• An executive for MillerCoors testified that manipulation of the aluminum market cost manufacturers over $3B. The World Bank estimated that in 2010, 44 million people worldwide were pushed into poverty because of high food prices. The chief cause? More than 100 studies agree the cause is speculation in the commodities market. (Goldman Sachs made $440M in 2012 from food market speculation.) For Americans who love their cars (and SUVs), the biggest impact might be felt at the gas pump where experts estimate that financial speculation has added anywhere from $1 to $1.50 to gas prices.
• One significant source of profit for the financial sector has been exploiting public, taxpayer-owned infrastructure. It should be blatantly obvious that these deals are bad for citizens, as the fees charged to citizens for use of the asset must not only cover servicing costs and maintenance capital expenditures but must also generate profit for the firms buying the assets.
• As the financial sector funnels more and more resources into lobbying and bribes (let’s face it, campaign contributions are nothing more than legal bribery), it has been able to strip an ever-greater amount of state-owned assets from the public. Public asset strip mining is one of the chief causes of the increasing profitability of the financial sector.
• I highly doubt any of my clients or readers are beneficiaries of the SNAP or “food stamps” program and are probably not very familiar with it. While it is nominally a government program it has been corrupted by the big banks. Benefits are provided electronically via debit cards (EBT cards). JP Morgan has made over $500M from 2004 to 2012 providing EBT benefits to 18 states. The banks then are free to reap fees from users for such things as cash withdraws for TANF benefits, out of network ATM fees, lost card replacement fees, and even customer service calls.
• I believe you can judge how profitable a service is to a company how much it spends on lobbying. In the case of JPMorgan, its bribes, I mean campaign contributions to Agriculture Committee (SNAP is part of the Department of Agriculture) members increased sharply after it entered the EBT market in 2004.
• The financial sector is a parasite that depends on its host organism, the productive sector of the economy, to fuel its profits. The larger the financial sector grows, the more wealth it extracts from the productive sectors of the economy. With all due respect to Matt Taibbi, Goldman Sachs isn’t a vampire squid; the entire financial sector is the vampire squid with its tentacles reaching into the pockets of citizens everywhere and sucking out money.
Reading on the Breaking news site, it is reported that 61 people lost their homes, can’t help wondering how many more may have been forced out of their homes under duress, shameful and 50,000 compensation will not address this situation, criminal what has happened to these poor people.
Too right Andy. The 50,000 isn’t enough for the mental hardship these people needlessly suffered over a long period of time. Even if senior management were not directly responsible for the error, they have a duty to implement systems to ensure that people do not lose their homes due to an error by their company. The damage to people and families as a result of such an error is huge, up to and including suicide due to the stress of losing your home. This doesn’t interest the banks though as it won’t affect them financially, and they can throw a few cheques for 50,000 around afterwards. The financial regulator, government and courts system exist to protect banking and business. The common man is on their own here.
Ciaran, I understand your point. I was being sarcastic though about senior management resigning. The point is that it is senior management usually in banks who do the damage in terms of policies that lead to PTSB having the highest number of tracker mortgages in the Irish banking industry and then serious pressure to get as many of their customers transferred to other mortgage terms, which leads ultimately to these kinds of consequences.
the homeowners will have to stick together and refuse the compensation. sue ptsb for everything the law will allow. these parasites are just as ruthless and would do the same to you. if they are offering 50k you can be sure that legally your entitled to much much more.
We call it the ministry for justice, it’s not, it is the ministry for law. You have no chance of justice in this country if your claim upsets the powerful. claims made against government bodies eg. Hse .banks, gardai, schools,local authorities ect.are paid by the state the state being you the tax payer. Nothing comes out of the pockets of the people who are responsible so who cares.
No that PTSB have admitted liability those poor home owners should launch legal action against them.
The offer of €50,000 will invariably be accompanied by a disclaimer.
Depending on the personal circumstances those who lost property may be able to claim for full market value..
It’s an offer of €50k if you lost your home, not if you’re still in it, but I agree with you, they should be responsible for the full value of the property. People’s lives (as well as their money) were stolen.
Yep, and emotional trauma does have a distinct value in this case. Bout time this industry accepted full liability for its actions, maybe then they wouldn’t be so quick to referb all their high street outlets and pay massive bonuses.
we are sorry and deeply regrettable that we got caught ERM oops I mean that you lost your home because we wanted as many repossessions as possible from those tracker mortgages!
Bankers rule the world they do what they want. Gov and judiciary back them up. FG Alan Shatter made it EASIER for banks to reposess. Gov represent banks and big business and police protect them not us. One big club and we ain’t in it.
Someone cooked the books. Will he / she be made accountable. Not likely. The thoughts of having lost your house to the greed of bankers who you had only just bailed out. Sickening…..
Does anyone else not agree that 50000 euros is no where near enough to compensate people who have lost their homes. The emotional stress alone is worth more considering the compensation that some people get nowadays!
No way. These people probably had to sell/ give away furniture etc. they will also have to refurbish any new house they buy. Also what about all the money the forked out for legal fees. They deserve that money returned. There are a lot of expenses you seemed to have forgotten about!
These banking mistakes always in favour of the banks, they are compensating 50k for the trauma and dehumiliation of been incorrectly kicked out of your home and maybe loosing good friends, schools and neighbours. Disgraceful. I’d be at my solicitor now and humiliate the bank.
Is this the same PTSB that facilitated a very dodgy ‘hiding’ of certain monies in conjunction with Anglo Irish? Nobody seems to have been sanctioned for this arrangement. In fairness it was conducted under the former Chairperson of PTSB.
Yep, and by the same token the banks effectively get a suspended sentence even though they have countless previous convictions…sounds familiar all right.
USC, HOUSE TAX, WATER TAX, HIGHER PRICES FOR JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING. CUTS FOR JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING. LOSS OF HOMES. EMIGRATION. SUICIDES. DEPRESSION. Etc..
FG/LAB ASSISTING THE PAYMENTS FOR BANKERS GAMBLING DEBTS AND A FAILING CURRENCY.
And yee are sorry.
F##k off.
The British landlords who get the bad rap for evictions in this country let people stay in their homes if they paid . Fast-forward 2016 The merchant bankers throw you out anyway. Progression well we have I pads I suppose.
22 families made homeless and they choose to publish this in mea culpa fashion…
Ok, so the Central Bank is making them play it this way, but for anyone who was arguing all along that the rates being demanded were incorrect and now finds themselves vindicated it must be a nightmare.
Firstly, what is being offered in compensation is derisory.
Secondly, solicitors who would have been involved in pushing such cases before the courts should be held to account. The Nuremburg Defence (“I was only following orders”) should not be allowed to apply to people who were paid to deprive these people of the right to enjoy their property.
Thirdly, the courts who did this. No responsibility?
Like Collette Browne, I’d tell the bank to stuff their compensation and sue.
These people should initiate a class action against this bank, not just for loss of their property but for emotional distress, mental stress etc. time for the boyos in this bank to be turfed out for monumental incompetence.
It’s crazy how the CEO’s of these companies can walk away with “I’M SORRY” after putting financial hardship onto families. Enda Kenny did say he would hold these people accountable in his vote for me campaign/lies. When are we going to wake up.
These poor people need to join together and day after day release their story into media one at a time to highlight the horrific nature of what has happened they should also join together in legal pursuit of this bank which is hanging by a thread as it is…. Sickening that this comes out now that they have been FOUND OUT time for everyone to drill down into their bank dealings and look at all loans I’d imagine there is a lot more to come on this one …….,
If they stopped “mistaking” money out of customers accounts in 2011, when did they realise it was the wrong thing to do and how long have they been strategising a media response?
I saw the 1 O’Clock RTE TV interview with the PTSB boss,he did’nt appear to be very distressed over the damage caused by his bank to its customers.Goes to show that the Banks are as detached from people’s lives as ever.I hope the affected customers of PTSB give this Bank hell !!!!!!
I feel so blessed to live in a country that cannot stop apologising to me. Bankers politicians n public servants just keep saying sorry. To all of you may I suggest somewhere dark and personal to stick your apologies. Sorry for any offence.
How many people who are currently customers will close their accounts because of the treatment of these people. That is the only way to hurt PTSB. I assume you must have a licence of some description to operate a bank in this Country. If so, notice should be given immediate that the PTSB licence will be revoked within a sensible time frame unless the the people who lost their homes are fairly compensated, ie new comparable homes at the old mortgage rates they were paying prior to the error and whatever monies they had paid off their old mortgage to be written off the new mortgage. Immediately the full board should hand in their notice to resign over the next 12 months. The senior management team who were responsible for the Department that made the mistake should also be asked to resign with immediate effect.
To me that seems fair.
As a matter of interest, whilst not having seen the full report of the AGM I wonder how many ordinary shareholders were up in arms at this news and called for heads to roll. I bet very few as society is moving towards the “I am ok jack, tough sh*t on you”
Ah they’re sorry… ah well tat makes it ok then….. Who gets away with not so much as a slap on the wrist this time? Ya have to love these irish banks… honest to jaysis!!!!!!
Wonder how long it will be before they bring in proper fees like other banks. Only a fool would expect to get something for free, any business has to make money somewhere and if they had charged properly for current accounts they wouldn’t be under so much pressure to make money from mortgages.
Next big storey EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE case number C41/15 the company streamrolling over the rights of 135000 (THOUSAND) investers lets see if Masding retires then!!!
Rory McIlroy takes two-shot lead into final round of Masters
3 hrs ago
2.1k
18
The cost of doing business
Central Bank went €3.6m over budget on new data system despite giving reassurances about cost
Stephen McDermott
3 hrs ago
1.5k
Money Laundering
Travel agent and husband caught carrying €340,000 for criminal group at Dublin Airport, court told
11 hrs ago
65.7k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 168 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 113 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 149 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 117 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 84 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 84 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 138 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 63 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 78 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 86 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 49 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 95 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 102 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 73 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 54 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 92 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 72 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say