We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
THE PRESS COUNCIL is hoping to attract new digital media members into its fold. Speaking at the launch of the Council’s 2013 report, chairperson Dáithí O Ceallaigh said that he believed the organisation is now well placed to deal with “all the challenges involves in this technological explosion”.
TheJournal.ie was the first major online news publication to become a full member of the Press Council, joining in September of last year.
O Ceallaigh said today that “in time, we anticipate, other digital media will recognise the value of our system,” and sign up to Press Council principles.
He said that the Council – and the Office of the Press Ombudsman – believed that “best professional practice in journalism is platform-neutral” and that it hoped other digital publishers would accept their Code of Practice and “the principles of accountability and redress”.
The Taoiseach and TheJournal.ie
The growing influence and readership of online media – both online-only like TheJournal.ie and the digital arms of newspapers and other media – produced challenges that the Council wished to meet, he added.
He said:
Not the least significant example of how this challenge is being met has been the recent accession of a major news website, TheJournal.ie, as a full member of the Council.We have always believed that the Council is well placed to embrace new as well as legacy media which are prepared to work with an independent system of accountability and redress based on a Code of Practice which reflects the best judgement of media professionals themselves.
Taoiseach Enda Kenny also spoke at the launch, saying that the Irish public is satisfied with the professional standards applied in the print media – and that he hoped the Council’s standards, guidance and support would also be applicable to digital media.
Of TheJournal.ie (and its commenting community) he said:
I know that the Council has in recent times welcomed a significant new member from the ever-expanding area of digital publishing; that’s with the admission of TheJournal.ie. I must say that sometimes I enjoy the bemusing and bemused eye of TheJournal.ie, even if the community response is not always as, let us say, supportive.I believe that the advent of TheJournal.ie to this fold is only the first step in encouraging digital media that are professional in character, and see the innate value of adhering to the standards of, and supporting, the Council and the Press Ombudsman.
Dáithí O Ceallaigh also spoke of the challenges of protecting media freedom to carry out investigative journalism and said that the Council was keeping under review recommendations by an EC report on media freedom and pluralism.
The report sought to address, among other issues, concentration of media ownership, political and commercial influence, and the effect of those factors on media independence.
However, it also suggested increased influence of the EC over the regulation of the press, a move which the Press Council would oppose.
Being Press Ombudsman
The 2013 Press Council report is the final one to be presented by outgoing Press Ombudsman John Horgan. He is to retire this September from the role which he has held since 2007, when the Council was established. His successor has not yet been named.
Over the period of his six years as Ombudsman, Horgan has upheld as many complaints as he has rejected (38 per cent for each). “I can assure you that this is not the result of any deliberate policy on my part, as of course the extent to which any complaint is upheld depends on the merits of each case and on the provisions of the Code of Practice, which govern all my decisions,” Horgan said today at the report launch.
The remaining percentage of complaints did not require formal decisions but were concluded in another manner. Common sense and mediation seems to resolve some complaints with Horgan reporting that “a private and personal letter from an editor, or a personal meeting with an editor, could much more satisfactorily reflect the spirit of the Code” than a published apology. This applies especially when the effect of such a public apology can be negative for the complainant, again putting a spotlight on an issue they deem to be private.
The role of social media in the future of journalism is one that must be tackled although, Horgan acknowledged, “as yet there are few route maps and no effective pricing system”.
He said that he hoped that the public would see freedom of the press as a “social and public value in itself” but that the principles and “spirit” of the Press Council Code of Practice would help the media to justify that public trust by acting professionally.
Investment in journalism
His six years as Press Ombudsman had taught him that “investment [made by the press in] the quality of their journalism… is an investment in public trust. He said:
It may take time to show up on the bottom line, but without it we will be all the poorer.
He also said that there is “immense goodwill out there for honest, courageous journalism”.
The Code of Practice, he noted wryly, was not written by the Ombudsman or the Press Council but by journalists. Ethical decisions, he said, are not achieved by “slavish” following of regulations, but by “ethical human beings” who set their own standards.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Be careful thejournal Enda’s got his beady eye on you :-)
Endless entertainment, these comment sections. You see all sorts.
Kenny has some neck saying irish people are happy with the professionalism of journalists while he has most of them under his big thumb
Nothing to do with having them under his thumb. Most Irish journalists are entirely self important egotists whose own agenda is pursued . Given how low are the public confidence ratings of journalists for An Taoiseach to say that the public are happy with the standards of professionalism employed in Irish journalism is a clear example of him pandering to a profession which he fears and which needs to be forced to comply with the highest standards of professionalism . Those who point the finger must be beyond reproach .
So Edna reads the Journal? It’s a wonder he hasn’t shut it down for sedition!
“Community response less than supportive.” Enda, those are your voters speaking! Listen!
I was always daily newspaper man but the journal has changed my ways. No more black inky fingers for me anymore.
Well if Enda is watching me, he is more than welcome to call down to my front to discuss my issue with his leadership. I’ll have a pie ready for him just in case…
What are all these challenges involved in the explosion of this sort of technology? I think it’s a good thing.
Not much mention of bringing journal.ie to a wider audience, or any real benefits. They’re mostly pre-emptively answering concerns on press freedom.
2016 is fast approaching…
Quick Google of daithi. Dublin city council, civil service and work in foreign affairs a real trail blazer.
I wonder how long the 5th Estate will remain as a bastion of freedom of speech before it is subdued by intergovernmental controls ? Congratulations to thejournal.ie on joining such exalted company as the Press Council and for doing such a good job :-)
Yes indeed, “the community response is not always as, let us say, supportive”.
But why are we not alway supportive? It’s particularly when we’re given bluster and guff and a whiff of self-congratulatory bullshit instead of the full story.
When this O Ceallaigh says “in time, we anticipate, other digital media will recognise the value of our system”. what exactly is that system, and what is that value? Who will it benefit? How and why?
The bottom line for newspapers, magazines and online publications is that the Press Council is about defamation, damage limitation and cost reduction.
The real reason behind the Press Council is not about upholding standards blah blah blah – it’s about maintaining an elite club in terms of libel law. An “independent self-regulation” club for certain parts of the media industry, which in turn decide the standards.
Digital publishers such as TheJournal are anxious to join this club because since 2010 any organisation that’s a member of the Press Council can avail of a new defence in defamation cases of “reasonable publication”.
But non-members can’t. They remain outside of the tent. They have to show that they have in place an equivalent fairness regime or operate an equivalent and publicised code of standards to avail of that defence. There’s that “standards” word again.
But the Press Council, by definition has the standards. It makes them. It “self-regulates” itself (don’t panic, it doesn’t makes you blind) and gets its members (see the various committees in their annual report) to sort out this awkward standards thing.
There may be more to it too, but the gist is that it’s not really about protecting members of the public – it’s about reducing the defamation costs of the owners of certain media.
Sounds fair enough. You do have to wonder about where press defamation stands with regards to comments made by users – presumably they are not protected in such ways- although if a dodgy comment is left un-moderated it falls to the website I guess.
No, it’s probably the opposite – read the bottom of this page. “Journal Media does not control and is not responsible for user created content.” It washes its hands of your unmoderated comments. You are on your own out there. You are just a user.
Daithi got congratulated by non other than John Tierney (Irish water) on leaving Dublin City Council. Ireland reaks
Apologies congratulated on his appointment by John Tierney. This fifth state stuff is…..
It would be nice to see the journal produce more original journalism and actual reporting. And decent feature writing, which I have yet to see. There are no real emerging writers as such. Likewise utilising comments as a way of expanding a story rather than just reacting to it. Some good suggestions do come out of comments but they don’t get filtered up or used as content. The thumbs up and down malarkey seems a little juvenile at this stage for a news source if it wishes to be taken seriously. If the citizen journalist element is to be fully explored it could be interesting to allow members generate content in an area that could then be drawn out into the main website by moderators if worthy. Time for the journal to move beyond a news blog perhaps and get a bit more serious.
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say