Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

NTMA in talks with investors on selling new 10-year bonds

The body in charge of Ireland’s borrowing says it’s looking at trying to sell Ireland’s first 10-year bond since 2010.

NTMA chief executive John Corrigan.
NTMA chief executive John Corrigan.
Image: Mark Stedman/Photocall Ireland

THE BODY responsible for managing Ireland’s national debt has said it is in talks with investors about resuming the sale of benchmark 10-year bonds – considered by the world’s markets to be one of the most reliable indicators of a country’s fiscal health.

National Treasury Management Agency chief executive John Corrigan said the agency was in talks about issuing new bonds to mature in 2023.

If issued, it would mark the first time since before the bailout that Ireland had issued such a long-term bond – and bring Ireland a further step closer to being able to fund itself on the open markets without Troika assistance.

Ireland’s last auction of 10-year bonds was held in September 2010, with a yield (or interest rate) of 6.2 per cent, after which it was decided to cancel the rest of the year’s auctions. Two months later Ireland had entered into an EU-IMF bailout.

Yields on 10-year bonds traded in secondary markets are usually seen as a key measure of the confidence investors hold in a country.

Germany, for example, would currently pay only 1.466 per cent interest to borrow on a 10-year basis, while France would pay 2.104 per cent. On the other end, Italy would pay 4.321 per cent while Spain would pay 5.134 per cent.

Greece, which still suffers from poor investor confidence, would be forced to pay 11.417 per cent for its loans.

Read: Ireland raises another €2.5bn at the bond markets

Read next:

Comments (27 Comments)

  • David 09/01/13 #

    Great news. Here’s hoping for a strong 2013 for Ireland.

    Reply
    • How exactly is this “great news”?

      Of course investors are “confident” in Ireland, it’s clear by now that our current regime would rather ruin our own economy than miss a repayment to bondholders.

      Our debt level is still unsustainable, and there has been no progress whatsoever on reducing it, by way of haircuts to junior creditors, or anything else. Again, of course “the markets” love us.

      I know that Ógra Fine Gael and other associated Blueshirt fellow travellers are only doing their best to pump the “Celtic comeback” party line, but I don’t see how selling bonds to service unsustainable debt is anything much to celebrate.

      Reply
  • Irelands image to the markets is strengthening daily this is very good

    Reply
  • Yet more good news. We’ve now had about three months of decent — though not spectacular — economic data. The cost of borrowing is down, employment is rising, mortgage approvals are up, exports are buoyant. If we have another 6 or 8 months of this we can genuinely talk abut a recovery and even begin planning what sort of society we want to live in after this disaster is over.

    Now if only they’d give us a deal on the promissory notes as we were promised, we’d be sucking diesel.

    Reply
  • Yet again…. Can’t believe this has not got more comments… Good news does not seem to be of importance to journal.ie or the majority of its contributors….
    Complete joke

    Reply
    • Declan you have commented on the fact you think “The Journal” is a joke,so why attach such importance to comments or lack thereof?

      Reply
    • It underlines the agenda of both the sites and the majority of contributors. As i have thought all along… The journalist are in this for the money and the contributors are just looking to abuse Goverment. It is never about reasonable debale or logic…

      Reply
    • Declan from a lot of your comments i have read it is only “reasoned debate”if it conforms to the FG party line and copious amounts of praise for present government policy.Not withstanding the fact that FG/Lab are implimenting all of the policies of the previous clowns.Although two regressive budgets are all of their own making;no excuses for those can be justified.

      Reply
  • *SOMETHING ABOUT NOONAN, GILMORE AND REILLY’S FAT SALARIES*

    Reply
  • Why have NTMA dropped the rate paid to Irish people who invest in Saving Certs below 3% when they are still paying over 3% to investors in 5 year bonds today ?. Does’nt seem fair to me.

    Reply
  • “…and bring Ireland a further step closer to being able to fund itself on the open markets without Troika assistance.”

    So this doesnt help repay the Troika billions – right???

    Reply
  • Corrigan is an ex AIB man who walked into this €490,000 per annum job in 2009, the highest paid civil servant in the country, he now earns around €416k. Lets hope he’s right.

    Reply
  • MORE MONEY OWED AND LONGER AND FIERCE BUDGETS! THIS DOESN’T WORK! JOBS,JOBS,JOBS IS THE ONLY THING THAT’S GOING TO MAKE THIS COUNRTY GO ROUND INSTEAD OF THIS MERRY-GO-ROUND OF GOV PREESENT AND FUTURE DEBT! THE ONLY REASON THERE TRYING TO DO THIS IS TO AVOID ANOTHER BAILOUT IN 2016!

    Reply
    • Jobs arent going to reduce government spending so jobs arent nessisarly the only thing needed

      Reply
    • @ Jay – jobs are very much needed, both for the morale of the state and for the economy of the state. Jobs will slightly decease government spending as people will be taken off the live register. More importantly though, more jobs mean more taxpayers, so that government spending, which is essential to improve front-line services, will be more sustainable.

      Reply
    • Jobs will generate more revenue i agree but jobs wont reform the government departements bleeding money more water dosent solve a problem of a leaky pool

      Reply
    • No, they won’t. But not creating jobs won’t help either. There’s no one single action that’ll solve the problem, I was only replying to your comment where you said that job creation won’t lower government spending; I disagree. More jobs means less unemployment which means less money being spent on social welfare. So more jobs does reduce government spending. But I don’t mean to say that job creation is an alternative to cutting spending to areas that are inefficient and wasteful. In short; job creation is a good thing and we need more good things in this country. So please don’t downplay good news such as job creation.

      Reply
    • I agree job creation is a good thing but its not the only thing the country need if you read my first comment it was a reply to michaels comment when he said jobs are the only thing that will make this country go round … That is incorrect

      Reply

Add New Comment