Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

Noonan dismisses plan for government bonds linked to tax income

Fianna Fáil’s Michael McGrath had asked the finance minister to consider a bond specifically linked to exchequer returns.

Image: Eamonn Farrell/Photocall Ireland

THE FINANCE MINISTER Michael Noonan has dismissed a Fianna Fáil suggestion that the government consider issuing a new line of government bonds where returns would be linked to Ireland’s tax income.

Fianna Fáil’s Michael McGrath had asked Noonan to consider a tax-backed bond where any rise or fall in the exchequer’s tax incomes would be reflected in the payouts made to investors lending to the country.

McGrath had proposed that these bonds be given a preferred status, which would allow Ireland to reduce the costs of servicing its debts if tax income was to fall, but which would also see costs rise as the national income grew.

Noonan said investors already considered tax receipts to be a fundamental source of the returns for their bonds anyway, and would generally not allow themselves to be nudged down the pecking order of sovereign creditors if a new tax-backed bond was considered.

“Furthermore, even if tax backed bonds were to be issued at a lower yield, an increased cost may be demanded from other bond investors who would not have been offered similar terms,” Noonan said.

The government would also have to rely on what the minister called a “potentially diminished pool of revenue streams” in order to cover the interest payable to the holders of more traditional bonds.

“Due to current market conditions, investors are reacting very negatively to any perceived or potential future subordination of their claims.

“The uncertainty caused by the widespread introduction of tax backed bonds could be expected to lead existing investors to reduce their holdings of Irish Government bonds, thus adversely affecting the yields on all new issues of Irish Government debt,” Noonan said.

Ireland has not issued any new government bonds since September 2010, the last auction before Ireland was frozen out of the bond markets and left requiring an EU-IMF bailout.

The National Treasury Management Agency did undertake a ‘switching offer’ in January, however, where it swapped €3.53 billion of bonds due in January 2014 with replacements which do not mature until February 2015.

It also intends to issue an annuity bond to pensions companies in the coming months, depending on the investor demand.

Read: Back to the markets: NTMA prepares to issue annuity bond

Read next:

Comments (10 Comments)

  • What are you talking about??? If you read the comment you will see there is no mention of SF.

    Reply
    • If you don’t know which party Cal posts on behalf of, you obviously do not read this site much.

      Reply
    • Danny, that is a libelous claim. I am not a member of SF and never have been. I have made many posts praising the current Government for legislation they have brought in, but yes, i do give honest direct and transparent comments about where i think the Government are going wrong. If everyone who disagrees with the Governments Economic Policies are to be labelled SF, then i think you will find that the vast majority of people on this site are SF members. Noonan must also be a SF member, given that he rejected FFs proposal today. Wake up man and stop being a FF lackey.

      Reply
  • Fagan's 21/05/12 #

    McGrath’s proposal is that people will lend money based on future tax returns, being reflected on the payouts. So there is no outline of return on investment, on top of that he wants them to get preferential status.

    Come off it McGrath, this is a totally unworkable proposal and well you know it.

    Reply
  • I have to be honest and say that any time FF are giving advice to anyone on doing anything regarding our country’s finances, i would think i would probably do the opposite. They do not have a track record to be proud of, and maybe they should stay quiet until such times as the country is back on its feet, and out from under the blanket of crap that their party left us in. There must have been somethingin this for FF for them to advocate doing it, their mantra is still party first. Until the traitors from the cabinet table from the 2002-2011 timeframe are in prison for treason, and every single party member found to have taken bribes are in prison along side them, i cannot even listen to anything they say.

    Reply
    • I don’t know why they’d need tax-backed bonds. Even if investors didn’t run a mile, haven’t we been told that the ESM is going to be throwing cheap money at Ireland, like a delinquent credit union, once we ratify the fiscal union treaty.

      Reply
    • It would be more sensible to look at each idea put forward on its merits. We know ff made a horrible mess of the economy etc but at this stage we have to swallow the rage and look for the best way to climb out of the hole we’re in

      Reply
    • Fagan's 21/05/12 #

      Govt’s use debt roll over, as it allows inflation to destroy the debt, over a longer period.

      His proposal is that Ireland reduces the payments if tax falls. That is going to be an incredible sell. Just imagining McGrath going in doing a presentation as Minister for Finance, to a room full of people concerned about Ireland’s ability to pay them back. His suggestion is that the worse the country is doing, the slower they get paid back.

      Would they term this a 5 yr loan, or an 45 yr one. Who knows, in McGrath’s school of economics, you leave the terms of the loan dependent on future events, I’ll pay you back when I have it boss, no idea when, maybe after the Children leave the nest”.

      It’s genuinely a crazy loohlah idea.

      Reply
  • Face on him like a slapped arse

    Reply
  • So, rather than make any comment on the merits or not of the issue in the article, the first post is a party political broadcast (comment actually, but you know what I mean) on behalf of Sinn Fein.
    Well done. :-)

    Reply

Add New Comment