Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Sunday 26 May, 2013

NAMA ends 2012 with €3.6 billion in the bank

The agency’s end-of-year report paints a positive picture after repaying €4.75 billion in debts last year.

NAMA chief executive Brendan McDonagh and chairman Frank Daly: pleased with 2012.
NAMA chief executive Brendan McDonagh and chairman Frank Daly: pleased with 2012.
Image: Sasko Lazarov/Photocall Ireland

THE NATIONAL ASSET Management Agency has begun 2013 with a cash balance of €3.6 billion, a level the agency itself claims is “healthy”.

The agency’s end-of-year report for 2012, published this afternoon, outlines that the agency has redeemed €4.75 billion in NAMA bonds to its investors – 63 per cent of the way towards its end-of-2013 target of €7.5 billion.

The agency has raised €6.9 billion through the sale of its assets, and has completed the sale of over 3,900 individual properties.

Those include 100 houses which have been sold under its ’80:20′ mortgage scheme, where new buyers draw down an initial mortgage worth 80 per cent of the total, and only draw down the remainder based on the home’s value in five years’ time.

295 properties have been made available through that scheme, a number set to be increased to 750 later this year.

It also has another €1.5 billion worth of Irish property assets on the market, being sold through debtors and receivers.

NAMA generated €4.4 billion in cash last year, which includes €1.3 billion in what is termed ‘recurring non-disposal income’ – likely to indicate regular rental income from its property holdings.

The agency says it has also identified 3,879 residential properties under control of debtors and receivers which may be suitable for social housing, with demand agreed for at least 1,484 of those and another 841 which could also be used.

It also approved €1.7 billion in advances to its debtors, in order to help them continue trading, of which €1 billion has been drawn down.

NAMA chief executive Brendan McDonagh said the generation of €10.5 billion in cash since NAMA first took loans in April 2010 “reflects a strong performance in terms of asset disposals”.

He added that the figures showed “the importance for NAMA of capturing the rental income from assets under the control of debtors”.

Chairman Frank Daly said there were growing indications of stabilisation in the commercial and residential property markets, and that when this was combined with the amount of bonds NAMA had repaid, it remained likely “we will achieve our ultimate objective of completing our work by 2020.”

Read: NAMA redeems €1.5 billion in bonds

Read next:

Comments (38 Comments)

  • Martina he was on your side you missed his point

    Reply
  • Beats my 3.6 cent overdrawn!!

    Reply
  • I ended 2012 with -€73 in the bank.

    Reply
  • So, how much can we give back to Germany thus reducing our loan repayments.

    Or am I missing everything.

    Reply
  • MrKnow 03/01/13 #

    It will be spilt and the chief and other directors will get a nice bonus out of it.

    Reply
  • So, how much did The taxpayer give the banks for the assets Nama sold?
    You can bet it was a lot than the amount they sold for

    P r o p a g a n d a

    Reply
  • So thats the bond payment in march paid so.

    Reply
  • 3.6 billion in what bank? The one formerly known as anglo, or as we call it now, angela.

    Reply
  • ‘..after repaying €4.75bn in debts last year’.

    Doesn’t it just flow so nicely off the anodyne page.

    No mention that the debt is paid to white-collar criminals, in services and emigration and aborted futures and suicides, depression, eviction, drug/alcohol anaesthetizations.

    You can abort as many lives as you like once they’re born. No whisper from ‘pro-lifers’.
    Move along..nothing to see here..just accountancy balancing their books on your backs.

    Reply
    • Sure didn’t they know you’d be on to write that for them. They are just saving on keyboard maintenance costs…

      Reply
    • I started typing a different reply than this Damien, then I thought what’s the point, people who want to view everything as negative are going to do just that …………………

      Reply
    • And people with their rose-tinted ideological monocles locked on the neoliberal trough of the main chancer will refuse to acknowledge that binocular vision helps navigation and point to a wishful-thinking soft landing while telling those who point to pitfalls to go commit suicide.

      It grows wearisome, the adamantine refusal to learn.

      Reply
  • All well and good but what about the initial billions pumped in to get the assets off the banks and into NAMA? In essence it seems NAMA reports as if there was no initial outlay, do we know if NAMA reporting is currently inclusive of the billions used to acquire these assets or is it ignoring this?

    Reply
  • And their pensions don’t forget their pensions

    Reply
  • €3.6 Billion?
    I’ll believe it when it is counted out in €500 notes on front of me, or preferably in gold bars.

    This farcical organisation was set up to do nothing more protect the guilty and to keep the real truth away from the public.

    Reply
    • Serge 03/01/13 #

      500 Euro notes are just a token of exchange, I doubt NAMA has any physical cash on hand. Even commercial banks only keep 12.5% or so of their assets in cash form. Cash is extremely unprofitable. Furthermore money is not backed up by the gold for decades now so no agency will be able to count anything out in gold bars.

      The ‘farcical organisation’ was set up in order to prevent the banks from imminent collapse, and if successful, NAMA will be a great source of revenue in the future when the recession is over, as they will be able to sell all those properties at a healthy profit. But that’s of course in theory.

      NAMA has its shortcomings, but all in all it’s a great concept and I believe it can and already does work. It’s the lesser of two evils if you will.

      Also, what are your sources on the accusation that NAMA was set up “to do nothing more protect the guilty and to keep the real truth away from the public”?

      Reply
    • My point regarding the €3.6 Billion is that I want to see concrete proof from this non transparent, state/taxpayer owned/subsidised organisation that operates behind a vail of secrecy.
      that this “€3.6 billion Euro” genuinely exists
      and
      how much of a write down (taxpayer loss) on the original debt was taken to generate this €3.6 Billion.
      and
      has/will NAMA waste(d) more in other years during it’s existence to counteract this “gain”
      and
      exactly what is this €3.6 Billion? Profit? Cashflow?(we own it we should be allowed to know)

      Sell swampland and damp decaying, cowboy built, half finished, badly located, ghost estates for a “healthy profit”
      After BOSI selling of their entire Irish loan book for 8c in the Euro?
      Can’t wait Serge.
      (BOSI maybe doing very well at 8c in the Euro when compared to NAMA’s eventual TRUE bottom line in 2020)

      Since when was saving corrupt and most likely criminal banks with taxpayer money “the lesser of 2 Evils” Serge?
      I’ll take the other option thank you, as we would probably be well on the mend by now similarly to Iceland.

      As regards NAMA protecting the guilty.
      As you have confirmed they were formed to save the corrupt/criminal banks that broke the entire country.
      Also they insist on paying developers up to €200,000 a year (€4000 a week) to maintain their luxurious lifestyles and mansions.
      When as far as our media is concerned, it is like these developers no longer exist, even though they racked up €74 billion that was foisted on the taxpayers shoulders.
      As individuals some of these guys racked up more debt than members of the Quinn family, yet they still play behind a vail of media immunity.

      Not to mention Mr Farrell (a NAMA employee) emailing large quantities of delicate, highly confidential information to his vested interests that could mean unsurmountable losses for the taxpayer.
      (then turning around and picking up a nice mansion of the NAMA books for his own personal gain before going off and working for the competition)
      If this was a private company he would have been prosecuted and most likely fined/jailed for these acts.
      Then you have Frank Daly one of NAMA’s bosses coming out in the media and saying, fair play to the media for picking up on this corruption, because NAMA didn’t.
      What a joke.
      A joke at the taxpayer’s expense.

      Anyway Serge.
      I’ll meet you back here in 2020 when I hope we can discuss the TRUE COST OF NAMA after we see the REAL bottom line.
      That’s only if NAMA decides to be a permanent fixture.

      Our Government(s) and NAMA have helped everyone but the victims Serge.

      Reply
  • Wonder how many hospitals €3,600,000,000 would buy?

    Rather see it go back into public property than private property….

    Reply
  • What eejit would take an 80/20 mortgage?
    What has it cost us to have NAMA?

    Reply
  • “Completing our work by 2020″?

    10 years to firesale a few properties and destroy an economy?

    There must be some award that we can conjure up for this brave outstanding feat of ingenuity.

    Reply
  • Martina – How are you broke due to working your arse off?

    Reply
  • Can we get some of that?

    Reply
  • So sad, so very little recovered for the burned tax payers and those deprived of necessary support. It’s a far worse recovery than even the most pessimistic and alarmist commentators originally predicted.

    It is appalling that NAMA is actually trying to spin this as a good news story.

    At least NAMA is generating rich rewards for the professionals engaged by NAMA.

    NAMA is a farce, a tragic farce.

    Now IN & M is flogging the story of the recovery of the property market and encouraging speculation in property again.

    Reply
  • Not one word of what anyone from NAMA says is true. Total spin how can they make a profit they make nothing pay themselves millions and massive pensions!! Honestly we are some shower of dummies…. Sad

    Reply

Add New Comment