Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Krugman: Ireland voted for a ‘bad idea’ – and euro could collapse in two years

The Nobel-winning economist isn’t impressed with Ireland’s vote – but reckons it could all be fairly meaningless anyway.

Image: Mel Evans/AP

ONE OF THE WORLD’S leading liberal economists has rubbished the Fiscal Compact as a “bad idea”, saying he cannot understand Ireland’s vote to ratify it – but believes the euro could collapse within two years anyway.

Nobel laureate Paul Krugman this morning said Irish voters should have voted only to support “what is right, rather than trying to appease the Bundesbank”.

The New York Times columnist – who on Wednesday had advised Ireland to vote No – told RTÉ Radio 1′s ‘The Business’ that there was a “fifty-fifty” chance of the single currency disappearing within two years anyway, given the pressures arising in Greece.

Krugman said that if the outgoing coalition of New Democracy and PASOK lost power after the second Greek general election, it was likely that Greece would reject its bailout conditions and then end up leaving the currency union almost immediately.

Even if they managed to stay in, he said, it would only take “about a year” of falling economic growth to put the country at risk of leaving it anyway – a move he believed the currency would not survive.

“The ECB does not rise to the occasion, with very very large lending, the whole Eurozone breaks up in a matter of months,” Krugman told George Lee.

Krugman said he believed there were two “inconceivable”, but equally likely, possibilities – that the ECB’s mandate would be expanded, in order to allow inflation to rise through a process of open-ended lending, or that Germany would veto expanding the mandate and allowing the union to “break up and fail”.

“One of those two inconceivable things will have to happen,” he said.

‘Good soldier’

The economist had earlier said that the Fiscal Compact was “not at all” a solution to Europe’s problems, saying it dealt only with “imaginary problems, not the real ones”.

“Ireland had a budget surplus and a low debt. Spain had a budget surplus and a low debt,” Krugman said, pointing out that both countries were struggling economically as a result of privatising their banking debts rather than through incurring too much sovereign debt.

Krugman, who won the 2008 Nobel prize for explaining the patterns of international trade, said the Fiscal Compact would instead force countries to pursue austerity policies – which Ireland had already shown to be ineffective.

“Two things were supposed to happen – Ireland was supposed to have an economic expansion, because austerity was supposed to create confidence and lead to economic recovery, and Ireland was supposed to raise confidence in the bond markets.

“Neither of those things have happened at all,” he said, remarking that the two occasions on which Ireland appeared to be on the cusp of growth – in early 2010 and late 2011 – had turned out to be ‘false dawns’.

This was a particularly good example of why austerity didn’t work, he said, because Ireland had been a “good soldier” in undertaking all the reforms asked of it, but still had not yet been able to engineer a lasting recovery.

Read: Paul Krugman says Irish voters should vote No

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (100 Comments)

  • Paul Oh 02/06/12 #

    The only way to sort this austerity mess in Ireland is to roll back the socialisation of private debts. Its as simple as that.

    Reply
  • Fear will triumph over anger every time. Its the driving force in the world today to keep control. Lets not dwell on the referendum, its over and i have no problem with anyone who voted yes. The establishment is who i have an issue with it.

    Reply
  • I think part of the problem (aside from the bank debt) is that Ireland did not go far enough. You have politicians and senior public servants on rolls Royce style packages. At the other end you have people trapped in the social welfare “poverty trap”. The only social welfare recipient I can think who’d be better off working for minimum wage is the single person with no kids living at home with Mammy – anyone else is better off, in some cases MUCH better off stating on welfare.

    Working people here see that not enough effort was made to level the playing field. They no more corrections are necessary. So they try to save their money.

    Bond markets see the govt is not serious about reform. The Croke Park agreement is crazy. The pensionable allowances paid by the state are nuts. The pay at the upper end of the civil service is mind boggling. Only a lunatic would lend us money

    Reply
  • Now that the government has access to the ESM gravy boat, how long will they continue to pay themselves, their useless quangos and their disfunctional civil servants their bloated salaries? How long before our grandchildren pay it all back?

    Disgusting.

    Reply
  • in a bank yesterday….so uncomfortable when an employee held a conversation loudly with an elderly gentleman about a direct debit with insufficient funds. a man who probably has worked hard all his life and was clearly making an effort to pay something to them for his mortgage. no private room. no dignity afforded to him. that is what this country has slipped down to. sadly i fear mr krugman is right and there is no comfort in being someone who voted no. made no difference. voting in such important issues should be mandatory and none should ever pass without a clear majority from within the whole voting population. the incident in the bank will not be the first or last of its kind. shame on banks. shame for all of us really. :-)

    Reply
    • wow, presume much. he could be on his third loan for all you know. and mandatory voting? I heard comments from voter saying they voted no simply because the government wanted a yes vote or because they didn’t understand. I don’t want uninformed, spiteful people voting for the sake of it.

      Reply
    • Martina, the Bank employee should have been reminded as to who pays their wage ! Works every time

      Reply
    • So you happened to hear a conversation between two people neither of whom you know and yet somehow have managed to extrapolate some wonderful fiction from it to support a point of view you already held.

      Reply
  • It’s strikingly similar to NYCs near bankruptcy in the 70s when they went with begging bowl to the fed. Their theory was that the city could only be rebuilt on austerity measures that bought the people to their knees. Which it did with half of Brooklyn and Bronx being burnt down horrendous cuts to services and utilities and social and creative revolt…, it worked for them but at huge cost to the marginalised … That’s the kind of sacrifice a govts prepared to make !!

    Reply
  • dont mind krugman, sher what does he know?Its not as if hes respected in his field like our raft of campaigners are.sher we had a few sports people and all,whats wrong with ye,who would ye trust more on the economy,a nobel winning economist or the ex meath football manager, i mean come on, its a no brainer

    Reply
  • Well, Well, so despite Krugman’s warnings, new book and recent appearances on Newsnight and Channel 4 news, there were still those “quite right wing” who lambasted anyone with an opinion this fiscal treaty is farce whilst accusing those who supported a NO vote as being left wing lunatics and readers of the SF Echo. Whilst do suspect most who voted yes did so out of fear or with gritted teeth, I am still amazed the yes vote won out on the day. I don’t think you have to be an economist to figure out the EU project is in the toilet, the Euro will cease and in the mean time our government will lead us to complete meltdown. Anyone who can prove anything has been achieved with this austerity nonsense is deserving of a Noble Prize.

    Reply
  • Enda must be raging after all his hard work to get the treaty passed, I heard Hollande isn’t as affectionate as old Nicky and there’ll be no pats on the head

    Reply
  • I find it completely mind boggling that anybody would listen to a gormless inarticulate puppet over a Nobel Prize winning economist.

    Reply
  • What would Krugman know?sure didn’t 9 out of 10 top Irish economists say a Yes was the correct action,on their past record they have never been wrong!

    Reply
    • Funny that Norman, they were called independent economists, when in fact they were all public employees. Doesn’t sound independent to me? That and, there was no concrete list of who was surveyed as compared to a total number of economists in the state.

      Reply
    • I know Diarmaid maybe Gary has that list.My thoughts Turkeys and Christmas.I think the country will regret that yes vote but too late now.

      Reply
    • Kearon provided an extensive list of independent economists who all had their college employers after their names. Should track him down for it, for a laugh if nothing else!

      On a side note I despair that after winning our freedom just 90 years ago we now have sold it again for the promise of access to a mere loan application form. Our country is led by idiots! We are interested in pleasing people and getting pats on the head, regardless of how many of our own people have to commit suicide, starve or emigrate to do so. I never thought I would say this but this country needs a revolution! Why are we paying Bertie Ahern multiple pensions, when 8 year old children are collapsing in schools because of mal nutrition? Why are we trying to please the Bundesbank when our own citizens are committing suicide over debts they can’t pay! And here we have 60% of the voters in the treaty either too afraid from being bullied and trying to keep a roof over their heads or too stupid because of party politics brainwashing to see what needs to be done! It’s time to take a stand!

      Reply
    • @ Diarmaid
      Well said, couldn’t agree more. I feel like I’m living through George Orwell’s ’1984’ at the minute in Ireland. Maybe rte should broadcast it so that the sheeple might see what’s going on.

      Reply
    • Government economists are over paid, brown nosed yes men.

      Reply
    • mattoid 02/06/12 #

      @Diarmaid
      Perhaps you would have preferred private sector bank economists to give a less biased view??
      Or perhaps you have better suggestions?

      Reply
    • And when you think about it 60% of 50% is really not a lot of people..

      Reply
  • The Titanic has hit the ice and the band keeps playing! Bad choise is an understatement !

    Reply
  • Hedge Fund Founder, Raoul Pal, of a same mind as Krugman with respect to demise of the Euro.

    “The End Game: 2012 And 2013 Will Usher In The End” – The Scariest Presentation Ever?

    Submitted by Tyler Durden on 05/31/2012 20:01 -0400

    If Raoul Pal was some doomsday spouting windbag, writing in all caps, arbitrarily pasting together disparate charts to create 200 page slideshows, it would be easy to ignore him. He isn’t. The founder of Global Macro Investor “previously co-managed the GLG Global Macro Fund in London for GLG Partners, one of the largest hedge fund groups in the world. Raoul came to GLG from Goldman Sachs where he co-managed the hedge fund sales business in Equities and Equity Derivatives in Europe… Raoul Pal retired from managing client money in 2004 at the age of 36 and now lives on the Valencian coast of Spain, from where he writes.” It is his writing we are concerned about, and specifically his latest presentation, which is, for lack of a better word, the most disturbing and scary forecast of the future of the world we have ever seen….

    And we see a lot of those.

    We don’t know exactly what is to come, but we can all join the very few dots from where we are now, to the collapse of the first major bank…
    With very limited room for government bailouts, we can very easily join the next dots from the first bank closure to the collapse of the whole European banking system, and then to the bankruptcy of the governments themselves.
    There are almost no brakes in the system to stop this, and almost no one realises the seriousness of the situation.
    The problem is not Government debt per se. The real problem is that the $70 trillion in G10 debt is the collateral for $700 trillion in derivatives…
    Yes, that equates to 1200% of Global GDP and it rests on very, very weak foundations
    From an EU crisis, we only have to join one dot for a UK crisis of equal magnitude.
    And then do you think Japan and China would not be next?
    And then do you think the US would survive unscathed?
    That is the end of the fractional reserve banking system and of fiat money.
    It is the big RESET.
    It continues:

    Bonds will be stuck at 1% in the US, Germany, UK and Japan (for this phase).
    The whole bond market will be dead.
    Short selling on bonds – banned
    Short selling stocks – banned
    CDS – banned
    Short futures – banned
    Put options – banned
    All that is left is the Dollar and Gold
    It only gets better. We use the term loosely:

    We have around 6 months left of trading in Western markets to protect ourselves or make enough money to offset future losses.
    Spend your time looking at the risks of custody, safekeeping, counterparty etc. Assume that no one and nothing is safe.
    After that…we put on our tin helmets and hide until the new system emerges”

    Reply
  • Ah sher who’s this Paul Krugman chap and what would he know? Young Fine Gael and some school teachers told me it was the right thing to do so I voted yes to a working Ireland!

    Reply
    • Who actually consults our government regarding economic policies and decisions they are not qualified to make? When I want to be informed, david mcwilliams, eddie hobbs, yet the guys who studied,earn their living through knowing this shit, yet no, we’l listen to buzz words.
      Another moan that pisses me off. Compare Ireland to Germany/France regarding population and tax intake – why is Ireland trying punch above its weight? We are overspending, salaries way too high, ahh I dont care anymore, mumble mumble mumble

      Reply
    • 90% of economists also believed it was the right thing to do…

      Reply
    • But what would they know?

      Reply
    • Mattoid, that’s the type of generalised statement that just proves a weak argument. Provide me with the list of economists surveyed, how many were surveyed as compared to total number of economists in Ireland. Then provide me with the process of how they were selected to prove their independence. I would also like to see some proof that they survey was overseen by an independent body like all good market research companies do. If you can’t provide me with all of that info, frankly, you’re talking out your backside!

      Reply
    • Dave 02/06/12 #

      No Mattoid, 90% of the 44 economists asked by the government said they’d vote yes. The Govt then reported “90% of all economists”. Big difference in those two numbers!

      Reply
    • Are these the same economists who said everything was fine, there would be a soft landing and we would have growth of 3% to 4% in 2011 – 2012?
      Well then we should really listen and take not then….

      Reply
    • In Australia lol

      Reply
    • Lots of economists were for a yes. It’s easy to find “an expert” to give his opinion one way or another. A very large hole in his argument/dismal of the fiscal treaty is his point that Ireland was running a surplus prior to the shit hitting the fan. While Ireland was running a surplus it was hugely dependent on the property Bubble and all the borrowed money that was funding the bubble.

      Reply
    • @john

      Please explain how this treaty will prevent this crisis happening all over again?

      The reasons why our government supported it is because they don’t know or want to contradict our European masters. No harm either in having access to the ESM slush fund to continue enjoying bloated salaries. So our children and grandchildren will just have to pay for this … who cares?

      Reply
    • mattoid 02/06/12 #

      @Diarmaid
      The survey was not carried out by the government, but by an independent research company, Indecon International Economic Consultants. A wide selection of academic and research economists were polled, of whom 44 responded. Government and private economists were deliberately omitted from the survey as there would be obvious bias there. For a full list of the institutions the polled economists were linked to follow this link:
      http://www.kearon.ie/?p=445

      If your post was intended to suggest that the survey was somehow tainted or biased towards the government then perhaps you are the one who was talking through his backside…

      Reply
    • mattoid 02/06/12 #

      @Dave
      Read my post above. This survey was carried out independently and had absolutely nothing to do with the government so please don’t try to mislead people by stating otherwise.

      Reply
    • mattoid 02/06/12 #

      @David.
      No, they were not the same economists. Government and bank economists were omitted from the survey due to obvious vested interests.
      Many independent academic and research economists warned of the dangers of the property bubble and the potential for a crash well before it happened but were largely ignored at the time (or were told by Bertie that they should go off and shoot themselves).

      Reply
    • Mattoid

      that would be Stephen three gran web host Kearon, former FF advisor. Completely indepenent and unbiased!!! I dont know who you think you are trying to fool, but if you want to be gullible and fall for the lies, go right ahead.

      Reply
    • mattoid 02/06/12 #
      Reply
    • should read *3 grand web host* – dont think we shoud be blaming his grannies for his pricing.

      Reply
    • mattoid 02/06/12 #

      @Ann
      Do yourself a favour and just read the report. If you think there’s some kind of Kearon conspiracy I’m sure you’ll be able to find a different link to the report to put your mind at rest.

      Reply
    • Read it when Stephen posted it initially, and my opinion still hasnt changed. Like I said last week, those who can, do. Those who cant, teach! When I wanted to know what economist had to say about the fiscal compact, I searched out the ELITES of economics and read up on Krugman and Stiglitz. Pity Sinister Mehole Noonan didnt do the same.

      Reply
    • mattoid 02/06/12 #

      @Ann
      Your assertion that Ireland’s professors of economics are somehow unqualified to comment is pretty laughable really and smacks of desperation, particularly given that Paul Krugman is also a teacher and lecturer as well as a columnist! Or do different rules apply to him?

      Reply
    • They do. He’s won a nobel prize for his work. They havent. Nor is he being paid by the Irish state and is therefore completely neutral and unbiased in his opinions. And em – how many economists in Ireland? I dont think 44 qualifies as a majority of Irish economists, which is what the headlines alludes to – “.90% of Independent Economists Surveyed voting YES in Stability Treaty”.

      Reply
    • mattoid 02/06/12 #

      So only Nobel prizewinners are entitled to comment now?? Even though he couldn’t do it so he’s teaching it?
      Have you any idea how ridiculous this is beginning to sound??

      Reply
  • gosh Jim you seem to be the only person extrapolating to suit yourself. firstly i didn’t overhear anything. everyone in the bank heard the whole thing. and secondly and rather sadly the bank employee didn’t have the manners to take it anywhere private. i therefore got to know the poor man much more than would or should have ever happened in such circumstances. you voted yes….fair play to you that was your right….others voted no. deal with it instead of castigating folk for making simple observations or having a view/opinion. i seriously doubt whether Bernadette is even concerned you don’t forgive her. get over yourself.

    Reply
  • who to believe…who to believe…
    An articulate, intellectual nobel laureate in the field of economics or a gormless, yellow bellied schoolteacher from Mayo????
    Tough one.

    Reply
  • well not presuming anything really….just going on how nice he seemed. fact remains he was getting shoddy treatment in a bank and the lack of respect afforded him showed little empathy for him whatever his circumstances. and making it mandatory to vote would increase the likelihood of ensuring it was taken seriously. i think spite is something you might know more about than I Steven…..

    Reply
  • I do not know anyone who voted Yes and I voted against it The “YES” voters have given our country away they did not even get a sale on it Shame on them and personally I will never forgive them

    Reply
    • I voted yes and actually I’m not looking for your forgiveness, Bernadette.

      Reply
    • Cant just blame it on the yes voters….those who couldnt be arsed voting carry a share of the blame too. Wonder how many yes voters are going to lose their jobs after the next bailout we wont need. The troika will more than likely want to slash the public sector and insist of Kenny & Co.Ltd slash their salaries.

      Reply
  • i also no no one who voted yes

    Reply
  • ..who actually voted yes? I didnt, dont know anyone who did, dont know anyone who even knows anyone that voted yes…seems strange..

    Anyway – why is captain hindsight only coming out now?! Where was he the last few months??!!!

    Reply
  • Aidan 02/06/12 #

    Don’t don’t know anyone who voted no, except me.

    Reply
  • Mrs Mulverhill of course it’s pure coincidence That China and Germany with large manufacturing bases can afford to bail out the USA and Europe respectively .

    Reply
  • Mattoid. what you are referring to is an Indecon report published the day before the refererendum. It was not an objective survey but a collection of random opinions.

    Reply
  • The European Community lacks the backbone to enforce Community laws without fear or favour. Further details by searching in Google for ‘Windle stops swindle’.

    Cheers

    The Common Informer

    Reply
  • Diarmaid without manufacturing,innovation and other wealth creation who pays Doctors Teachers and nurses.

    Reply
  • Who is this guy to say that 60% of the voting Irish are so wrong. Is he of the ilk that gave Obama a Nobel Peace Prize after about one year in office. Rubbish !

    Reply
  • We are fed up of economists. Go away !

    Reply
  • Anyone know how many people Krugman employs in Ireland?

    Reply
    • Anyone know how many people Karl Whelan employs in Ireland?

      Reply
    • Thats a prerequisite to express an opinion?
      He’s only a nobel prize winning economist he would have to bow to superior intellects such as the mensa members in our cabinet

      Reply
    • Oh that’s right, I was waiting for that one. To have a valid opinion you must be an employer! Come on people, don’t you know the business community are always right about everything. I say this as someone who has a small business who is perplexed who much extra notice gets taken of people who employ someone. Believe me, someone who can save a life, educate a child, protect a victim or nurse a sick person is a lot more valuable to humanity than someone with grand notions of themselves.

      Reply
    • @norman anyone know how many people the 44 “independent” economists employ between them in Ireland?

      Reply
    • Exactly Diarmaid. It’s just pure market triumphalism. This ridiculous idea that politics and society must all bow down to the so called ‘job creators’, who couldn’t possibly wrong, and certainly can’t be subjected to any criticism. This Reagan notion of ‘trickle-down economics’, as long as we let the rich get filthy, maybe some in the lower ranks can get a bit too. I mean of course facts and statistics probably discredit this idea a whole lot….but then again, what would they know?

      Reply

Add New Comment