Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
EVERY FEW MONTHS, a rumour crops up that Google is interested in buying Twitter.
It cropped up again this morning, and may have contributed to a 4% rise in Twitter’s stock price. One outlet reported rumours that Twitter had hired Goldman Sachs to fend off two possible takeover rumours, one from Google.
We have no idea if the rumour is true. Twitter declined comment and we haven’t heard from Goldman Sachs.
But if it turns out to be the case, there’s a strong precedent in the tech industry for this kind of acquisition. In 2008, Microsoft tried to buy Yahoo.
Microsoft was worried about Google dominating a new market, search. Microsoft tried to build its own competitor, Bing (then known as Windows Live Search), but it didn’t take off with users.
So Microsoft figured it would buy the number two player, Yahoo, and combine its search and search ad business with Microsoft’s own.
Fortunately for Microsoft, Yahoo fought the deal and Microsoft walked away — months before the economy collapsed and Yahoo’s shares lost more than half their value.
As then-Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said in 2011, “Sometimes you’re lucky.”
Facebook threat
Like Microsoft was threatened by Google, Google is threatened by Facebook, which is doing a better job than any other internet company of competing with Google for user attention and ad dollars.
Google tried to build its own competitor to Facebook, Google+. But Google+ never took off with users, and has been relegated to a sign-on platform across Google services with a few interesting features for sharing photos.
So, Twitter. It’s the number-two social network, and has all kinds of data about connections between users and their interests. That data could be very helpful to advertisers.
Twitter is worth more than $33 billion. Google would have to pay a pretty premium to buy it. Say, $50 billion. Google has the cash — more than $64 billion at last count — and could certainly deal with the taxes from repatriating all that cash from overseas.
Big costs
But there would be huge integration costs. It would be a huge distraction. Antitrust regulators, who are already looking at Google under a microscope, would be very interested in the deal, too.
Sure, Google might be able to take Twitter’s information about users and the connections between them and use it to target ads even more effectively than it already can. But there’s a limited pool of advertising money.
Advertisers are going to keep spending with Facebook because that’s where the people are, and Facebook is getting better and better at targeting ads to those people.
The time for Google to buy Twitter was back in 2009, when it would only have cost $1 billion — about 4% of its annual revenues. That ship has sailed.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
I now prefer twitter to facebook. Just need events and their sorted
i only use facebook to wish people a Happy Birthday
Happy birthday.
Just as long as it doesn’t threaten thejournals copy and paste tweets policy!
Skynet! One company owns all…look out folks….
Don’t worry. There is still Microsoft.
So then, which one is the evil one?
If such a deal goes ahead, I can see all Twitter users being forced to create a Google user profile, much in the way you have to with all Google products and services.
Google is like the EU which can be summed up in two words – Fascist dictatorship
Would a fascist dictatorship allow you make such a comment or give you such unhindered Internet use? I doubt very much so. Back into your box.
You’d know the schools are closed this week :)
Still don’t really see the point of twitter apart from using it to make comments. Facebook has many uses but I really don’t get twitter.
It’s a micro blog. It’s not supposed to be used like Facebook. Twitter is excellent tool for getting your message heard. You select your newsfeed and see everything. No algorithms choosing what you see.
Great news. Really important stuff.
Said no one about this story, ever.
@fred yet you took the time to read it
It’s a good tech read. Facebook have also nailed mobile revenue. They have adapted well to it. Google is still struggling in that field.
It will be interesting to see how the next few years pan out. It’s difficult to retain such a coveted spot in the tech world.
The internet is literally watching us all. Mad.
I use both, why not?
If Google take over Twitter, then I will be deactivating and closing account as I did with facebook when they introduced their sneaky new opt ins in Jan of this year.
have your say