Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

AP Photo/Tony Avelar

Google's self-driving cars learned an important lesson about driving near buses

Thankfully neither of them were travelling at speed when they crashed.

GOOGLE RECENTLY TAUGHT its self-driving cars an important lesson about buses: they’re less likely to yield.

That’s the company’s conclusion after one of its autonomous vehicles crashed into the side of public transport bus in Mountain View, California, prompting it to make “refinements” to its software.

“From now on, our cars will more deeply understand that buses (and other large vehicles) are less likely to yield to us than other types of vehicles,” the company writes in its monthly autonomous vehicle report for February.

This was the first accident where Google admitted that its self-driving car was at fault, rather than the accident being caused by other human drivers. Nobody was injured from the crash as the car’s speed was less than 3kmh while the bus’s speed was 24kmh.

The incident in question occurred on Valentine’s Day after Google’s car had followed the “social norm” of pulling to the rightmost side of its lane to prepare for a turn.

Self Driving Cars AP Photo / Eric Risberg AP Photo / Eric Risberg / Eric Risberg

However, the car discovered sandbags blocking its way in front of a storm drain, so it needed to merge back into the center of the lane. In slowly doing so, it hit the bus, according to the DMV traffic report Google about the crash.

Google says its test driver had allowed Google’s car to make the move despite seeing the bus coming, because he or she expected the bus to slow or stop.

“Our car had detected the approaching bus, but predicted that it would yield to us because we were ahead of it,” the report said. “Our test driver, who had been watching the bus in the mirror, also expected the bus to slow or stop. And we can imagine the bus driver assumed we were going to stay put”.

Our test driver, who had been watching the bus in the mirror, also expected the bus to slow or stop. And we can imagine the bus driver assumed we were going to stay put. Unfortunately, all these assumptions led us to the same spot in the lane at the same time. This type of misunderstanding happens between human drivers on the road every day.
This is a classic example of the negotiation that’s a normal part of driving – we’re all trying to predict each other’s movements. In this case, we clearly bear some responsibility, because if our car hadn’t moved there wouldn’t have been a collision. That said, our test driver believed the bus was going to slow or stop to allow us to merge into the traffic, and that there would be sufficient space to do that.

“This type of misunderstanding happens between human drivers on the road every day,” Google writes.

The company says that it hopes that the refinements it made to its software will help it “handle situations like this more gracefully in the future”.

Read: Snapchat employee sent personal details to scammer they thought was their boss >

Read: You could use Facebook to figure out your friends’ sleeping patterns >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Published with permission from
View 34 comments
Close
34 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Niamh Speaks
    Favourite Niamh Speaks
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:38 AM

    If the bus had also been driverless it would have been programmed to let the car merge in. The world will be a whole lot safer when we get driverless buses.

    123
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Hipster Enda
    Favourite Hipster Enda
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:59 AM

    Driverless Luas would be even easier to implement. 24hr service, No strikes.

    127
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eugene Walsh
    Favourite Eugene Walsh
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:59 AM

    And youll be allowed to eat bananas on driverless buses too

    33
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eugene O'Gorman
    Favourite Eugene O'Gorman
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 10:22 AM

    Eugene – what’s the context there? Sounds like a story?

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eugene Walsh
    Favourite Eugene Walsh
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 10:44 AM

    Eugene, I couldn’t possibly say. The PC brigade and more would maul me . But we’ll still be able to eat bananas with a bit a luck

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jax Maxwel
    Favourite Jax Maxwel
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:24 AM

    Google cars need to learn buses do whatever the f they like. Middle of the road at rush hour? Perfect place to stop and let this old lady off and then pull out without bothering to look.

    60
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rothar Man
    Favourite Rothar Man
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:21 AM

    This is a non story, why are we trying to find ways of talking this tech down. People are getting worse at driving – we need this.

    49
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jax Maxwel
    Favourite Jax Maxwel
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:28 AM

    People are getting worse at driving? What? where did you pull that one out of?

    24
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rothar Man
    Favourite Rothar Man
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:30 AM

    Well they aren’t getting better. Put down your phone / makeup/ smoke / food/ paper and look around. They are getting worse

    37
    See 5 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute James Darcy
    Favourite James Darcy
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:40 AM

    Actually if the bus had been automatic and the rules of the road followed this wouldn’t have happened.

    28
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jax Maxwel
    Favourite Jax Maxwel
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 10:03 AM

    Road fatalities are going down year on year. 166 in 2015, 193 in 2014. There was 415 in 2000 and has gone down gradually every year since? Stats don’t lie, your wrong no matter how much you ‘look around’. That’s just the fatalities I can pop out the collision stats to prove its not just down to car safety either.

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Howudoin
    Favourite Howudoin
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 11:53 AM

    # Rothar Man… Drivers & Cyclists getting worse…. cyclists need to also pay attention and learn how traffic lights work…. a red exists meaning stop!!

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jax Maxwel
    Favourite Jax Maxwel
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 1:38 PM

    Whats that? Silence? Could also be a man on a bike cycling furiously away from the facts.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ron Koeman
    Favourite Ron Koeman
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 4:56 PM

    People are getting better at driving, hence the decrease in road deaths

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute S mahady
    Favourite S mahady
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:39 AM

    I can’t wait for this technology to become available. Just think. It’s Christmas. You’ve been shopping. It’s teaming with sleety rain and you’ve walked 20 mins from your car but alas you call your car to you while you have a coffee. Brilliant. That said if I was a bus driver or taxi driver I would find them as a threat to my job and run them off too.

    43
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute S mahady
    Favourite S mahady
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:42 AM

    Not to mention the car could probably detect a driver having any type of health matter. Automatically contact 999 and bring the now patient to the hospital. Or you had an accident up the mountains and can’t drive and lost your phone in the accident. Chitty chitty can get you home safe or to a safe place. Brilliant. The possibilities are endless.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Frank's Cat
    Favourite Frank's Cat
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:43 AM

    It will be the resurrection of the rural pub too.

    76
    See 3 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute postman pat
    Favourite postman pat
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 10:46 AM

    you forgot to mention that someone could hack in to it and hold you to ransom and drive you to god know’s where unless you pay a ransom

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Moylan
    Favourite John Moylan
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 12:51 PM

    ..only above 55mph though, otherwise it’s not likely…… :)

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute postman pat
    Favourite postman pat
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 6:14 PM

    not likely means there is a chance and the technology is not readily available when the guys that can do this have time to scrutinise one in the flesh it could be a different ball game

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Joe Traynor
    Favourite Joe Traynor
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:28 AM

    The human supervisor got it very wrong but an automated car should not be programed to play chicken with a bus.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Watchful Axe
    Favourite Watchful Axe
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 1:33 PM

    I like their deflection, we bear ‘some’ responsibility. Taking chances is the definition of bad driving, you wait for a gap or for someone to actually stop. (or if no one lets you out, inch a bit to close the gate after a good while). Maybe the bus driver stopped and then said feck it but they did not say that.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dean Anderson
    Favourite Dean Anderson
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:28 AM

    That car is bigger than I thought. I thought they were using tiny looking mini yokes

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute damian
    Favourite damian
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 7:14 PM

    They have them too….

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Hank Schrader
    Favourite Hank Schrader
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 10:10 AM

    Need a bit of code change. Bus Driver = No Merge

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Moylan
    Favourite John Moylan
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 12:52 PM

    ….or, car meets sandbags = stop.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute roadrunner
    Favourite roadrunner
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:24 AM

    Smashing news

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Howudoin
    Favourite Howudoin
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 11:19 AM

    # Rothar Man… Drivers & Cyclists getting worse…. cyclists need to also pay attention and learn how traffic lights work…. a red exists meaning stop!!

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Pat Gorman
    Favourite Pat Gorman
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 2:55 PM

    The robot car has not been taught the very first rule of driving:
    “Always assume that the other driver is an idiot”.
    (Translation: Never assume that you know what the other vehicle is going to do next).
    .
    Google will need to write a LOT of more code.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Stephen Earle
    Favourite Stephen Earle
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 4:12 PM

    In reality,the whole concept of driverless cars is dumb. All it takes is a lack of maintenance, software failure, hardware failure and the result is monstrous pile ups on the worlds motorways.
    It’s similar to the old idea that one day we would all be flying around in personal helicopters and the like. Can you imagine the results of flying hoons, mechanical failure etc with that sort if stuff, it beggars belief

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Derek Walsh
    Favourite Derek Walsh
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 4:34 PM

    The computers that currently control cars have software and hardware failures all the time. They require defragging and a full reboot that takes upwards of 8 hours every day. If they don’t receive this – or even if they are not appropriately stimulated – they are prone to shutting down completely while in control of a vehicle. They are poor at judging speeds, can only deal with extremely limited amounts of data and, because they are made of meat, their reaction times are shockingly slow.
    All these failure in the current generation of car-controlling computers cause perhaps a million fatalities a year.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Shawn Rahoon
    Favourite Shawn Rahoon
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 7:36 PM

    In a motorway pile up it is of each individual drivers responsibility to keep a safe distance behind the vehicle in front to be able to stop and avoid rear-end collisions. If there were no tailgaters there would be no pileups.

    3
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute postman pat
    Favourite postman pat
    Report
    Mar 1st 2016, 9:33 PM

    Ah Shawn what Stephen is talking about is if all cars are driver less you have no control over the distance they are apart they do

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds