Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Ireland leads deal with European Parliament on new banking watchdog

The deal with the parliament means that MEPs will now get the ability to pick the leaders of the supervisory board.

Image: Sam Boal/Photocall Ireland

IRELAND’S PRESIDENCY of the Council of the EU has reached a provisional deal with the European Parliament on setting up a new banking supervisor to work across the Eurozone.

The deal copperfastens agreement reached between member states last year, when it was decided that the European Central Bank and national central banks would split the task of regulating banking activity on a pan-continental basis.

The establishment of a common European supervisor is considered a major factor in the EU’s plan to overcome the financial crisis, and to ensure that further questions over the running of European banks cannot emerge in future.

The deal is also important for Ireland, as the establishment of a single banking supervisor is a precursor to any deal where the Eurozone’s bailout fund, the European Stability Mechanism, could take a direct part in bailing out struggling backs – removing some of the financial obligations from national governments.

Once this is in place, European governments can discuss whether the relatively unique circumstances of Ireland’s bailout – where the country could not afford to support its oversized banking sector – mean it should be given the chance to sell its banking stakes to the ESM.

The agreement with the European Parliament ensures that the agreement reached by individual states last December will not be blocked by MEPs.

Today’s deal gives the Parliament the right to pick the Chair and Vice-Chair of the supervisory board which will oversee the regulation of the European banks.

“The Single Supervisor is the core element of banking union and a vital step in breaking the vicious link between the banks and the sovereigns,” said Ireland’s finance minister Michael Noonan, who currently chairs the ‘Ecofin’ council of EU finance ministers.

“Restoring confidence in the supervision of European banks couldn’t be more important in bringing stability to Europe.”

Read: EU leaders agree on bank supervision

Read next:

Comments (48 Comments)

  • Scrutinise what you like but when the top execs get paid close to a million per year plus pensions in a failed bailed out institution you can never get transparency. But wait. That’s right if you don’t pay big bucks you don’t get the right guys in charge. But wait they have always been paid huge and guess what. The best were /are rubbish. Itchy itchy scratch scratch the lot of ya from banks to politicians.

    Reply
  • The gold circle is alive and well.

    Reply
  • Caption for photo. ‘Ah now don’t be like that. Sure it’ll be grand. The bankers have nothing to worry about.’

    Reply
  • Red Ed 19/03/13 #

    I just want it known that I hate his face!

    Reply
  • The EU are completely incompetent. The euro crisis is dragging on for years now and they cannot solve it. Now they want to supervise our banks

    Reply
  • Am I reading this right… So Instead of the EU appointing a stern German expert with a recognizable academic record and career in finance and economics, Irish MEPs are going to have their pick of who they want to supervise our banks…. Great, there’s no way that can backfire, perhaps Sean Fitzpatrick or one of the Quinn’s would be interested?

    Reply
  • If the banks are allowed to ignore Basel 3 why should we believe this will change anything. Tighter control on banks balance sheets is the only way to curb the madness in lending and too big to fail institutions.

    Reply
  • Nikolas I believe it is skepticism. We had a national regulator and he failed to regulate and as a result the nation is suffering. A pan European regulator will fail only on a bigger scale . That is my fear anyhow.

    Reply
    • But if we’re saying that banks need regulation but there’s no-one that can be trusted to do this, then there’s no point in even trying. And I refuse to buy into complete defeatism…

      Reply
    • And it is not wise to be once bitten ? There is rationality in that at least

      Reply
    • Put it this way Nikolas I may come share your optimism if I see a certain current court case result in a certain individual facing consequences for his actions. And if others cases were to follow on from that then I may find reason to found my optimism on then. Regulation without consequence is not genuine regulation.

      Reply
    • Brian- Always interesting to hear your thoughts on bankers. Just wondering. As an architect- any views on the construction industry’s role in our economic decline?

      Reply
    • I see an Industry in total devastation and maybe that gives you some sense of happy schadenfreude Vincent. Or do you prefer Richard Rogers , co incidentally another Architect ? Show your face coward !

      Reply
    • That’s interesting, Brian. Because I think a lot of people would feel the construction sector played a huge part in inflating the property bubble- overcharging people for houses, profiteering, forcing them to get loans they couldn’t afford and which they are now desperately trying to pay back amidst the unprecedented economic carnage caused by said same economic bubble. Just to be clear, I don’t think it was brickies people blame. Rather people at the other end of the supply chain. You know. Like architects who lived it up throughout the Celtic Tiger. I mention this just in passing, of course.

      Reply
    • Surprise surprise Vincent but I happen to agreee with you there.

      Now show your face.

      Reply
    • Someone’s got to do it or no-one does it. It would help if it was someone who could be shown to be neutral, independent and actually has a decent understanding of the subject. But these are the options we have.

      I still choose the option of someone regulating banking rather than no-one regulating banking. Once bitten, twice shy works both ways; not regulating banking is more like “once bitten, hope we won’t be bitten again” or “once bitten, defeatedly accept we will be bitten again”.

      I would choose something over nothing, even if the something has a risk of failure or corruption, as nothing is exactly that; nothing, either through apathy or cynicism. And nothing is the only “real” option, there’s no point even discussing the issue in the first place.

      Reply
    • Flawless logic Nikolas. I really really hope your optimism bears fruit. Because it must do.

      Reply
    • @ Brian – So do I. It might seem like I’m being naive, but honestly there’s no constructive way forward with the mindset that “everything’s doomed to failure”. A slim chance of improvement is better than no chance and, despite the quibbling over the details, regulation of banking practices is a good and necessary thing, as the recent past has shown us.

      It mightn’t work in practice, but then again, there’s a possibility that it might.

      Reply
  • Great news!!!! More jobs for Lab and FG hacks

    Reply
  • ”The deal copperfastens agreement reached between member states last year, when it was decided that the European Central Bank and national central banks would split the task of regulating banking activity ”
    So the banks are to regulate the Banks – Great .
    ”The agreement with the European Parliament ensures that the agreement reached by individual states last December will not be blocked by MEPs.”
    so waht do the MEP – those Revolutionaries get to do ??–
    —- Oh they get to pick the Chair and Vice chair of Supervisry borad – apart from the term – ” stable doors and horses ”- sorry this article does not give me any confidence in waht is needed – regulating banks as per Glas Steagall .

    Reply
  • “Europe will change in the twinkling of an eye!”

    Reply
  • A single supervisor. Quick Brian Cowen your good work has paid off. And lucky you, ye don’t have to share with Lenihan.

    Reply
  • Have a vote.
    I vote for Lowery our most transparent politician. We all know him so well now sure wouldn’t it be good for him to challenge his expertise.

    Reply
    • Note: the same photograph and (slightly edited) headline used here could have graced the breaking Cyprus story…

      “Ireland leads deal with ECB on Cyprus bank bailout….” [Noonan photo]

      Reply
  • Sure they are controlling the government and hense the people and so the bank,s .That the way it look,s to me

    Reply
  • Rayven 19/03/13 #

    http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/2013/03/18/reasons-to-fear-a-false-dawn

    Noonan is getting a warm feeling but it may a messy outcome yet

    Reply
  • Given that the vast majority of people on this site are in agreement that unregulated banking practices were the main reason for the economic crisis, I’m a bit bemused with the negative reaction to regulate banking practices.
    My less than able brain now hurts.

    Reply
    • Chris 19/03/13 #

      Bankers regulating themselves! Get real

      Reply
    • Then who should regulate them, the governments of the countries? No-one? Religious leaders? Someone’s got to do it or no-one does it. It would help if it was someone who could be shown to be neutral, independent and actually has a decent understanding of the subject. Those are the options we have.

      Reply
    • what about bankers from different countries i.e the dutch regulator to oversee the regulation of irish banks, and irish regulator to regulate french banks and so on?

      Reply
    • John Cash is speaking sense again ( a bit like his namesake… )

      Reply
    • and to go a step further, make the regulators country responsible for any mismanagement or loss through dodgy practice.

      Reply
    • i think the one thing that is lost in all of this is culpability and as kevin will tell you its a sore subject with me.
      we let our own central bank and the finiancial regulator off the hook and it bugs the shit out of me.
      i would charge neary with treason and only pardon him if he came clean about the whole rotten affair. I cant believe he didnt spot anglos corruption and i cant believe that he wasan’t told to look the other way by the central bank and government of the day.
      only when we cleanse ourselves fully and show we are a fair and just people will things get back to normal

      Reply
  • The hypocrisy of people on here is something to behold. I mean its just stunning. There’s a phD in it for someone who wants to study how bias warps the minds capacity to absorb information, logically interpret it and formulate an opinion. There are people on here confusing themselves as to whether they’re pro-European oversight or not, depending on whether in some way the answer will fuel their pre-existing contempt for our own Government. Crazy, crazy stuff.

    Reply

Add New Comment