Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Careers clinic: The Professional Unemployed – a phenomenon

They were in comfortable jobs before the recession took them out at the knees – and they don’t know how to apply for a job. Read more…

More time to walk the dogs? The Professional Unemployed is often at a loss when they lose their job after a lifetime of working.
More time to walk the dogs? The Professional Unemployed is often at a loss when they lose their job after a lifetime of working.
Image: David Jones/PA Wire

THEY ARE CATEGORISED as the professional unemployed.

Until recently, they were in jobs that gave them a comfortable lifestyle. Or they ran their own businesses, subjecting themselves to the daily challenges of self-employment: tweaking products and services, developing new lines and dreaming dreams.

And, then, the indiscriminate big bang took them out at the knees, as it took out so many others. Now, they haven’t got jobs. Their businesses have failed. They have weekly shortfalls trying to keep things paid.

And, in many cases, they see no prospects: self-belief and the power to influence their future having gone south along with the job or the business. The phenomenon of the professional unemployed has become so commonplace now that, last month, NUI Maynooth held a two-day workshop – Guiding the Professional Unemployed – to assist practitioners in the various agencies who are encountering more and more people of the above profile seeking assistance.

What is coming to light is that many of those who previously achieved in their careers are extremely poorly-equipped to navigate their current position.

All sense of self-worth can vanish

Frequently, they know very little about how to apply for a job. They were often head-hunted or made progress up the ranks, and never developed an appreciation of the nuances of job-searching – where jobs are advertised, how un-advertised jobs get filled, how to write a CV, how to use their network, how to portray their strengths in a job interview, and the like.

All sense of self-worth can vanish.

“Am I employable anymore?” I was asked by Martin (not his real name), a forty-something male who had scaled the heights for most of his business life (my work brings me into regular contact with people of this profile.) I saw him as a wholly employable person: versatile, excellent with people, someone others would follow, inspirational even.

And yet he couldn’t see it. “What have I got to offer?” he wondered. When his business succumbed to the downturn, his self-belief plummeted with it. The ‘fall from grace’ was total: like losing your footing at the top of Everest and tumbling all the way back to base camp. There was no respite.

Mary (again, not her real name) articulated her demise in different, but equally insightful, terms. She, too, had seen her successful working career run aground when she was laid off by the multi-national company for which she worked at middle management level.

“It was like one minute I was switched to success, and the next minute I was switched to failure – there was nowhere in between, just gone out like a light,” she said.

A highly-talented sportsperson – with accolades, contacts and respect in the sporting world – she had become entirely pessimistic about her career options. She had ceased to see the value in her sporting achievements, for example.

Outwardly, they look accomplished and formidable – inside they’re flailing

Arguably, those were her strongest suits. By accessing that network alone, she could generate opportunities for herself. The sport at which she excels has a strong commercial element here in Ireland and worldwide, and she has many doors upon which she can knock, but the benefits of that dominant element of her life eluded her as she contemplated redundancy. Yet, she asked: “there’s nothing I can do, is there?”

This is a story repeated over and over again throughout Ireland at the moment. Many people allow their self-worth and status to become closely bound up with their careers: when that goes, everything goes, right back down to base camp. And, outwardly, they may look as accomplished, formidable and able as heretofore: inside they’re flailing.

What can be done to get these people back on their feet again? Friends and family members, as well as former work colleagues, can play a huge role in helping people to see their own worth: time and again when working with individuals or groups, I am taken aback by the blind spots people have when it comes to evaluating their own strengths.

They tend to see their attributes in narrow, esoteric terms, and fail to project those attributes beyond what they have always done. An intervention by a family member or friend, if even just point out skills and qualities, can have a hugely beneficial effect, and, where possible, we should take time to say those things. It may have much greater impact than you realise.

Liam Horan of SliNuaCareers.com is TheJournal.ie’s resident careers guru and he’s always keen to hear your stories. To obtain your free Career Resource Pack from Sli Nua Careers, simply go here.

Read: Previous Careers Clinic columns>

Column: Stay positive, keep moving – the advice YOU gave me>

Read next:

Comments (31 Comments)

  • outside im failing, inside im raring to go :)

    Reply
  • My experience is a lot of employers are reluctant to take on Achieving Leaders, what they are most comfortable with is Obedient Followers.
    When a career ends at the upper steps of a corporate ladder, it is fact for most, in Ireland at any rate, that the bottom rung of another ladder is the fact for a lot of people.
    Continuous Rejection while a Dependant of the State is a mind numbing experience.
    Thats why, in my opinion, any position, part-time or scheme or voluntary is vital.
    Thats the real failure in Ireland, its the payment of Social money without asking for a return.
    That return would be gladly given and would benefit both parties hugely.

    Reply
  • And a lot of employers don’t want to know about us when it comes to job applications.
    Over qualified, you’d be bored with this role, you’ll leave shortly are just some of the things we’re told.
    Mostly though, when I apply for a job, I simply don’t get a response.

    Reply
  • Our network was set up with the agm to support and encourage men interested in a career in the childcare profession. there is a huge gender imbalance in the workforce with less than 2% of us being but a huge recognition of getting gender balance improved. childcare can offer good work life balance, flexible training routes, challenge and a rewarding fun career. we’ve seen builders, stay at home dads, ex military, factory workers etc enter the profession. More info available on http://www.facebook.com/meninchildcare

    Reply
    • Couldn’t agree with you more, too few males in the Childcare area, and the modern men are excellent with children

      Reply
    • We recently moved to an area that has male child carers, two women and one man per class. It’s a very positive thing IMO, nice for the boys in the class to have a man in there. They love him, does all the boy things that women teachers wouldn’t think of, simply because they’re not men – if that makes any sense. It probably doesn’t.

      Reply
    • Thanks Paul and Maura for you words of support, it important to challenge stereotypes. Since the recession we’ve seen a lot of guys rethinking career paths and looking at childcare as a career that can support them but more importantly one that is really really enjoyable and is so beneficial to to children too.

      Reply
    • More kids need good male influences in their lives. This is brilliant.

      Reply
  • Very interesting article, very close to how I felt when I was made redundant. It’s nice to know I was not the only one feeling that way. I have a young child and a big mortgage so I had to find the belief that I could get a job. As said here, friends, family and ex colleagues really supported me to see what I couldn’t anymore. My husband was also made redundant at the same time so it was hard for us to find the strength to support each other. On the upside I am in a new job for the last 20months and I love it. It’s a higher position than I had before and better conditions. I suppose I am saying if this happens to you believe in yourself and find strength wherever you can. It might be hard to believe at the time but when one door closes another one opens once you keep searching for that door!!

    Reply
  • Some good points in the article, but don’t forget that self-employed people often have no income in this situation, most are not entitled to social welfare. No source of income, banks not lending, add the issues mentioned in the article, and you have a critical situation for many people who don’t get any help.

    Reply
  • Theres a generation that is likely to never work again. I’m 30 now, lets say it’s 10 years before this country needs me (civil engineer) again…who’s going to hire a 40 year old that hasn’t worked in 10 years?! I wouldn’t hire me, i’d get the fresh, eager graduate in instead..

    Its a shame, I was very good at what I did. Now it’s X-box, daytime tv, beard, and pizza… They never said anything about this bit in college..

    Reply
  • Good idea to volunteer. Charities need professional expertise and with cutbacks and falling donations are unable to pay. Volunteer your professional ability. You will enjoy it, develop new skills, stave off the depression …. And it continues the cv.

    Reply
  • The social welfare system we have here is too generous. People should be provided with enough to survive, whilst at the same time being given every incentive to work, and help to get back to work. Real courses/training with real prospects. Something is wrong when social welfare recipents, out of work can have a full sky tv package, digital widescreen tvs, holidays in the sun etc. Why should the working people have to fund such luxuries, that in many instances, taxpayers themselves cannot indulge in.

    Child benefit should be cut, or at least limited to one child. If people cannot afford to have children, then they should not have them. Why dont they focus on working hard, getting ahead, and putting themsleves in a position where they can afford to have kids. Thats what most working people do. They have a plan and follow it. Why should people work, only to hand over their money to pay for other people having unlimited children, with no means but an expectation that the state will pay for them. It’s simple, if I cant afford it, I dont get it, until I am in a position where I can afford it.

    As for dividends, how are these ‘unearned’? I have a company and through my hard work, 80-100 hour weeks and goal setting, my company pays me dividends, a reward for the fruits of my ambition and hard work. If I chose to invest in another company, with my hard earned money, taking a risk with my capital to help expand a business that I think has potential, doesn’t my risk deserve some reward if it proves to be a good investment?

    Finally, if people had to pay the state back for their University education, once completed, people would quickly reattach a sense of value and purpose to third level education. Students would pick courses that would be likely to result in gainful employment, therefore benefiting the state. If something is free, people attach less value to it. Everyone would have access to education, and could then repay the state through giving say 5-10% of their wage each month to pay off the University loan.

    Reply
  • Pretty well written article!

    Reply
  • @Padraic O’Callanain

    “The social welfare system we have here is too generous.” That’s a separate argument. One could in fact agree with it, while still supporting the idea of basic income. (The actual level of basic income would be a matter for political debate, after the principle is accepted.)

    “People should be provided with enough to survive, whilst at the same time being given every incentive to work, and help to get back to work.”

    How, exactly, does it help unemployed people get back to work if they are taxed 100% on their social welfare payment–assuming they have anything at all–if they take up work? (Ie they lose their social welfare benefit.) How would that encourage someone (eg) to start up a business from scratch, if they couldn’t pay their food bills in the meantime?

    “Real courses/training with real prospects.” Agreed.

    ” Something is wrong when social welfare recipents, out of work can have a full sky tv package, digital widescreen tvs, holidays in the sun etc. Why should the working people have to fund such luxuries, that in many instances, taxpayers themselves cannot indulge in.” That’s the whole problem, isn’t it? With basic income, everyone has a basic level of subsistence, including working people (who can then top it up through work, on the salary from which they pay tax).

    “Child benefit should be cut, or at least limited to one child. If people cannot afford to have children, then they should not have them. Why dont they focus on working hard, getting ahead, and putting themsleves in a position where they can afford to have kids. Thats what most working people do. They have a plan and follow it. Why should people work, only to hand over their money to pay for other people having unlimited children, with no means but an expectation that the state will pay for them. It’s simple, if I cant afford it, I dont get it, until I am in a position where I can afford it.” That’s a separate argument (that we shouldn’t reward people for having children) and it’s not without merit. But it’s not central to the issue of basic income. And it begs the question of what would actually happen to children of existing large families–one could hardly leave them to starve.

    “As for dividends, how are these ‘unearned’? I have a company and through my hard work, 80-100 hour weeks and goal setting, my company pays me dividends, a reward for the fruits of my ambition and hard work. If I chose to invest in another company, with my hard earned money, taking a risk with my capital to help expand a business that I think has potential, doesn’t my risk deserve some reward if it proves to be a good investment?” There is an argument around risk as you say, but consider also the situation of someone who just has rich parents and benefits all their life from a trust fund. There are many such people.

    “Finally, if people had to pay the state back for their University education, once completed, people would quickly reattach a sense of value and purpose to third level education. Students would pick courses that would be likely to result in gainful employment, therefore benefiting the state. If something is free, people attach less value to it. Everyone would have access to education, and could then repay the state through giving say 5-10% of their wage each month to pay off the University loan.” This has been a disaster in the US, with graduates leaving college with crippling debts and no means to pay them off in the foreseeable future, due to the economic downturn. Higher education should be paid for out of taxation. If everyone benefits from a highly education population, then everyone should pay for it.

    Reply
  • Also a good idea.

    Reply
  • The simple reason why Self employed people dont qualify for Social welfare benefits in this state is because, there is some kind of a theory that self employed people have a chance to under declare income and minimise their tax payments and also to benefit from low declared income in the area of 3rd level grants etc.

    I am not saying it happens but I am saying it is ‘understood’.

    Reply
  • Brilliant article Liam. This might be useful to boost guys’ confidence and maintain skills http://www.menssheds.ie

    Reply
  • We need to replace the outmoded “welfare” system with a basic income whereby every citizen has enough to live on, without means testing, stamp payment or work-requirement . People who became unemployed, whatever their background, would then be able to survive without indebtedness. They could top up their basic income by part-time work, set up a business, and/or learn to play that instrument they never had a chance to take up:

    http://www.socialjustice.ie/sites/default/files/file/SER/SER%202012/2012-04-10%20-%20Shaping%20Irelands%20Future%20-%20SER%202012.pdf

    Reply
    • That is not what this country needs, nor can it afford it. We need stronger regulation to ensure that the people who deserve the job seekers allowance get it. I still can’t see the logic behind self employed people not been entitled to the dole, it’s preventing people from starting new companies (which we need) and then punishing them if they fail. Yet the person who has not worked their whole life gets a free house or rent allowance, free medical and 200quid a week to live on (he says as he currently claims the BTEA). Being a welfare state is simply not sustainable. But they won’t cut any of the things they should, they know they’ll lose too many votes, and the left wing nutters would be out in force.(still don’t know why there voice is so prevalent)

      Reply
    • Actually we can afford it. It shouldn’t cost any more than the present dole system, since we would simply be rationalising the way the present system works and removing bureaucratic obstacles to people getting back to work. At present we pay people too little to live on, on condition that they don’t earn any more, in order to make sure they spend their day doing nothing (except applying for jobs that don’t exist). Makes no sense.

      “I still can’t see the logic behind self employed people not [being] entitled to the dole.” Exactly. With a basic income system, self-employed people who become unemployed would receive a basic living allowance like everyone else, on top of which they could work at getting a business of the ground, voluntary work, unpaid internships to get themselves back into the jobs market, paid part-time work or whatever.

      The point about not cutting back any of the things they should is a separate issue, and it’s not true anyway.

      Reply
    • @Paul O’Brien

      So essentially you are saying that the State should pay everybody a ‘wage’ without anyone having as much as lifted a finger? Essentially creating a nation of freeloaders. Nice. Where has this shangri-la society actually worked before?

      Who would pay for this wonder society where nobody had to work in order to survive, where people just played their instrument of choice and arsed about inbetween daytime television and pot noodle snacks?

      Please answer this: Where would the money come from? And please provide me with a real sustainable answer instead of some socialist soundbite like ‘taxing the fat cats’. I’d like to see a real plan.

      Reply
    • @Padraic O’Callanan

      There is already a kind of basic income system in place in Ireland. It’s called child benefit, Basic income would extend it to all citizens.

      Work is not the only source of wealth. Wealth is created from things (like land) that at one time belonged to no-one (or everyone if you want to put it that way). Things like TV sets and computers are, at least in part, a result of our common knowledge-inheritance, which again is not the property of any specific person.

      People already benefit from unearned income, eg from share-dividends, family gifts, inheritances, tax breaks on pension funds, etc. At the moment, these mostly benefit the better-off segments of society. Basic income would extend this advantage to all citizens.

      It’s undeniable that some people would choose to be “freeloaders” as you call them, though no-one I’ve talked to about this ever admits that they would be one of those people! Most people would, I think, want to earn more than the very modest basic-living subsistence that basic income would afford. In any case, you need to balance the downside (freeloaders) against the advantages (eg making it much easier for unemployed people to get back on their feet again).

      There has been a (partial) basic income system in place in Alaska for many years. The economist Milton Friedman was a proponent of basic income (in the form of a Negative Income Tax) and in fact it was nearly instituted during the Nixon presidency in the US.

      *Where would the money come from? We clearly have enough to pay everyone a basic income as things stand, since we do so already through the social welfare system, except in a way that is riddled with obstacles, poverty-traps, and unfairness (eg self-employed people not qualifying). Basic income would rationalise the system and get rid of most of the negative elements. There have been specific studies on basic income with financial costings (in Ireland by Crotty, Ward, Clarke etc). If you do a Google on Social Justice Ireland, BIEN (Basic Income Earth Network) etc you should be able to find these.

      Reply
  • Interesting that people changed their names for this article, why?

    Reply
    • For this article Paul, I think names were changed as it is not really about the individuals story but this new area of professional unemployed, and that there are many Mary and Martins out there.

      Reply

Add New Comment