Business ETC uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

‘Banking union’ plan to shift cost of bank losses from taxpayers

European Commission says new framework will be primarily based on preventing and preparing for banking problems.

Image: AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic/PA

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION has released details of its new proposals for protecting taxpayers against future bank losses through greater economic integration and a ‘banking union’.

The Commission is proposing a new four-pillar ‘banking union’ and says a new framework for tackling future banking problems will be based foremost on prevention and preparation, followed by early intervention.

The proposed banking union incorporates a single EU deposit guarantee scheme for all EU banks, one uniform ‘rule book’ for bank supervision, a single EU supervisor with ultimate decision-making powers for systemic and cross-border banks, and a common resolution authority and fund for the resolution of systemic and cross-border banks.

The proposals favour resolution over insolvency proceedings, because the Commission says that the former protects certain stakeholders – such as depositors – and keeps the banks operational. The latter can take years in order to ensure maximising the value of the assets involved in the interest of the creditors.

The cost of any such resolution “should be borne by the banking sector rather than taxpayers” and a single European resolution fund should be set up in time but that for now, “setting up a single pan-EU fund would be difficult”.

The Commission says in a memo today that although using public funding to bail out troubled banks may have been necessary to prevent widespread market disruption, “it is clearly undesirable for public funds to be used in this way at the expense of other public objectives”.

It also says that high-profile banking failures such as Anglo Irish Bank and Lehman Brothers have revealed “serious shortcomings” in the current framework for coping with such crises while demonstrating that “supporting banks which are too big to fail with squeezed public finances is becoming increasingly unsustainable”.

ECB leaves main interest rate unchanged at 1pc >

Read next:

Comments (9 Comments)

  • Sounds like the French and Germans are trying to protect their own taxpayers from bank debt! It’s not going to be of any use to Ireland though!

    Reply
    • My first thought as well. Can’t be upsetting the german voter by making them suffer the injustice the Irish voter was burdened with….

      Reply
    • Fagan's 06/06/12 #

      The EU is about Germany and France fist and foremost. Like the way interest rates are set. It is based on German needs rather than Eurozone needs.

      When the German banks start to be overwhelmed by their poor capitalization, is around the timetable for this plans implementation. Same as ECB stimulus will only kick in when the German economy is loosing out on exports. They’ll allow the ECB to support growth and investment but it will be very much geared to elements that will benefit the German economy. Look at Greece having to buy German military hardware over the last few years.

      The EU has turned in to a freakshow and it is a great threat to the prosperity and freedom of most of Europe at this stage.

      Reply
    • Precisely Rodrigo, and notice how these pencil pushing pond life even use this crisis to justify a closer union. They want to bind all the smaller nations inextricably to the poison teat of the Franco German cow. The longer this crisis continues the greater the disadvantages outweigh the advantages of Irish membership of this economic s&m club called the eurozone. Hopefully the Greeks will set the wheels of its break up in motion sooner rather than later.

      Reply
  • No use to Ireland as it only talks about future protection.

    Reply
  • I’m not seeing the “retrospective” anywhere

    Reply
  • Deutsche mark, Deutsche mark uber alles

    Reply
  • It seems that the banks will always find a way, would this actually of been able to prevent Anglo?

    Reply
    • Fagan's 06/06/12 #

      It wouild have saved the state 3bn a year in Anglo Payments. 3 bn that would make an incredible investment and development prog. for this country.

      Unfortunately as the bank was not called the Franco-German Bank, it does not benefit us.

      We got shafted massively by Europe.

      Reply

Add New Comment